Between 1970 and 1974, ten variants of a supersonic axial compressor stage were designed and tested. These included two rotor configurations, three rotor tip clearances, addition of boundary-layer control consisting of vortex generators on both the outer casing and the rotor, and the introduction of slots in the stator vanes. Design performance objectives were a stage total pressure ratio of 3.0 with an isentropic efficiency of 0.82 at a tip speed of 1600 ft/s (488 m/s). The first configuration passed only 70 percent of design flow at design speed, achieving a stage pressure ratio of 2.25 at a peak stage isentropic efficiency of 0.61. The rotor was grossly separated. The tenth variant passed 91.4 percent of design flow at design speed, producing a stage pressure ratio of 3.03 with an isentropic efficiency of 0.75. The rotor achieved a pressure ratio of 3.59 at an efficiency of 0.87 under the same conditions. Major conclusions were that design tools available today would undoubtedly permit the original goals to be met or exceeded. However, the application for such a design is currently questionable because efficiency goals considered acceptable for most current programs have risen considerably from the level considered acceptable at the inception of this effort. Splitter vanes placed in the rotor permitted very high diffusion levels to be achieved without stalling. However, viscous effects causing three-dimensional flows violating the assumption of flow confined to concentric stream tubes were so strong that a geometry optimization does not appear practical without a three-dimensional, viscous analysis. Passive boundary-layer control in the form of vortex generators and slots does appear to offer some benefit under certain circumstances.

This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.