This paper presents a numerical approach to simulate sliding friction between engineering surfaces with 3D roughness in point contacts. The numerical approach is developed on the basis of the deterministic solutions of mixed lubrication, which is able to predict the locations where the asperity contacts occur, and the pressure distribution over both lubrication and contact areas. If the friction coefficients over the contacting asperities have been determined, total friction force between the surfaces can be calculated by summing up the two components, i.e., the boundary friction contributed by contacting asperities and the shear stress in hydrodynamic regions. The frictions from asperity contact were determined in terms of a limiting shear stress or shear strength of boundary films while the fluid shear stress in the lubrication areas was calculated using different rheology models for the lubricant, in order to find which one would be more reliable in predicting fluid tractions. The simulations covered the entire lubrication, regime, including full-film Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication (EHL), mixed lubrication, and boundary lubrication. The results, when being plotted as a function of sliding velocity, give a Stribeck-type friction curve. This provides an opportunity to study friction change during the transition of lubrication conditions and to compare friction performance on different rough surfaces, which is of great value in engineering practice. Experiments were conducted on a commercial test device—universal material tester (UMT) to measure friction at a fixed load but different sliding velocities in reciprocal or rotary motions. The results also give rise to the Stribeck friction curves for different rough surfaces, which are to be compared with the results from simulations. The samples were prepared with typical machined surfaces in different roughness heights and textures, and in point contacts with steel ball. Results show that there is a general agreement between the experiments and simulations. It is found that surface features, such as roughness amplitude and patterns, may have a significant effect on the critical speed of transition from hydrodynamic to mixed lubrication. In the regime of mixed lubrication, rougher samples would give rise to a higher friction if the operation conditions are the same.

1.
Patir
,
N.
, and
Cheng
,
H. S.
, 1979, “
An Average Flow Model for Deterministic Effects of Three-dimensional Roughness on Partial Hydrodynamic Lubrication
,”
ASME J. Lubr. Technol.
0022-2305,
100
(
1
), pp.
12
17
.
2.
Lugt
,
P. M.
,
Severt
,
R. W. M.
,
Fogelstrom
,
J.
, and
Tripp
,
J. H.
, 2001, “
Influence of Surface Topography on Friction, Film Breakdown and Running-in in the Mixed Lubrication Regime
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part J: J. Eng. Tribol.
1350-6501,
215
(
6
), pp.
519
533
.
3.
Wang
,
Q. J.
, and
Zhu
,
D.
, 2005, “
Virtual Texturing: Modeling the Performance of Lubricated Contacts of Engineered Surfaces
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
127
(
4
), pp.
722
728
.
4.
Choo
,
J. W.
,
Olver
,
A. V.
, and
Spikes
,
H. A.
, 2003, “
Influence of Surface Roughness Features on Mixed Lubrication
,”
Lubr. Sci.
0954-0075,
15
(
3
), pp.
219
232
.
5.
Zhu
,
D.
, 2003, “
Effect of Surface Roughness on Mixed Lubrication Characteristics
,”
Tribol. Trans.
1040-2004,
46
(
1
), pp.
44
48
.
6.
Zhu
,
D.
, and
Hu
,
Y. Z.
, 2001, “
Effects of Rough Surface Topography and Orientation on the Characteristics of EHD and Mixed Lubrication in Both Circular and Elliptical Contacts
,”
Tribol. Trans.
1040-2004,
44
(
3
), pp.
391
398
.
7.
Wang
,
W. Z.
,
Chen
,
H.
,
Hu
,
Y. Z.
, and
Wang
,
H.
, 2006, “
Effect of Surface Roughness on Mixed Lubrication Characteristic
,”
Tribol. Int.
0301-679X,
39
(
6
), pp.
522
527
.
8.
Sanda
,
S.
, and
Someya
,
T.
, 1987, “
The Effect of Surface Roughness on Lubrication Between a Piston Ring and a Cylinder Liner
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., IMechE Conf.
,
1
, pp.
135
143
.
9.
Hu
,
Y. Z.
, and
Zhu
,
D.
, 2000, “
A Full Numerical Solution to the Mixed Lubrication in Point Contacts
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
122
(
1
), pp.
1
9
.
10.
Zhu
,
D.
, and
Hu
,
Y. Z.
, 2001, “
A Computer Program Package for the Prediction of EHL and Mixed Lubrication Characteristics, Friction, Subsurface Stresses and Flash Temperatures Based on Measured 3-D Surface Roughness
,”
Tribol. Trans.
1040-2004,
44
(
3
), pp.
383
390
.
11.
Bair
,
S.
, and
Winer
,
W. O.
, 1979, “
Rheological Model for Elastohydrodynamic Contacts Based on Primary Laboratory Data
,”
ASME J. Lubr. Technol.
0022-2305,
101
(
3
), pp.
258
265
.
12.
Houpert
,
L.
,
Flamand
,
L.
, and
Berthe
,
D.
, 1981, “
Rheological and Thermal Effects in Lubricated E.H.D. Contacts
,”
ASME J. Lubr. Technol.
0022-2305,
103
(
4
), pp.
526
532
.
13.
Wikstrom
,
V.
, and
Hoglund
,
E.
, 1994, “
Investigation of Parameters Affecting the Limiting Shear Stress-Pressure Coefficient—a New Model Incorporating Temperature
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
116
(
3
), pp.
612
620
.
14.
Stahl
,
J.
, and
Jacobson
,
B. O.
, 2003, “
A Lubricant Model Considering Wall-slip in EHL Line Contacts
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
125
(
3
), pp.
523
532
.
15.
Rabinowicz
,
E.
, 1980, “
Friction—Especially Low Friction
,”
Proceedings of the International Conference on the Fundamentals of Tribology
,
N. P.
Suh
and
N.
Saka
, eds.,
The MIT Press
, Cambridge, MA, pp.
351
364
.
16.
Hoglund
,
E.
, 1999, “
Influence of Lubricant Properties on Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication
,”
Wear
0043-1648,
232
(
2
), pp.
176
184
.
17.
Lee
,
R. T.
, and
Hamrock
,
B. J.
, 1990, “
A Circular Non-Newtonian Fluid Model: Part I - Used in Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
0742-4787,
112
(
3
), pp.
486
496
.
18.
Gecim
,
B.
, and
Winer
,
W. O.
, 1980, “
Lubricant Limiting Shear-Stress Effect on EHL Film Thickness
,”
ASME J. Lubr. Technol.
0022-2305,
102
(
2
), pp.
213
221
.
19.
Iivonen
,
H.
, and
Hamrock
,
B. J.
, 1991, “
New Non-Newtonian Fluid Model for Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Rectangular Contacts
,”
Wear
0043-1648,
143
(
2
), pp.
297
305
.
You do not currently have access to this content.