A detailed experimental study has been made of the behavior of a 100 nm high transversely oriented ridge in an elastohydrodynamic (EHD) contact. Ultra-thin film interferometry has been used to measure film profiles accurately over a very wide range of lubricant film thicknesses, from a few nanometers up to nearly one micron. This enables the recovery of the amplitude of the inlet perturbation geometry with increasing EHD film thickness to be quantified and compared with numerical predictions. In pure rolling under very thin film conditions, corresponding to a smooth surface EHD film thickness of 10 nm, the surfaces near the ridge were squashed down, leading to a constriction in the film of only about 9 percent of the height of the un-deformed ridge. As the EHD film thickness increased, this deformation recovered until the ridge constriction regained about 90 percent of its original height at film thicknesses of about 1 μm. However this relatively rapid recovery only occurred in pure rolling and is attributed to the local perturbation of film convergence which the ridge generates while in the inlet region. This propagates through the contact at the mean speed of the surfaces and—in pure rolling—acts to diminish the effect of local squeeze. When sliding was present, the ridge remained almost fully deformed even when the mean film thickness was as much as twice the height of the original ridge. In this case, the ridge travels through the contact at a different speed from the mean of the two surfaces. The consequent decoupling of the ridge and the convergence perturbation results in a large local pressure due to squeeze which acts to inhibit recovery of the ridge. The general trend of the behavior of the lubricated ridge is shown to be in good agreement with earlier theoretical results.

1.
Jackson
,
A.
, and
Cameron
,
A.
,
1976
, “
An Interferometric Study of the EHL of Rough Surfaces
,”
ASLE Trans.
,
19
, pp.
50
60
.
2.
Wedeven
,
L. D.
,
1978
, “
Influence of Debris Dent on EHD Lubrication
,”
ASLE Trans.
,
21
, pp.
41
52
.
3.
Wedeven
,
L. D.
, and
Cusano
,
C.
,
1979
, “
Elastohydrodynamic Film Thickness Measurements of Artificially Produced Dents and Groves
,”
ASLE Trans.
,
22
, pp.
369
381
.
4.
Kaneta
,
M.
, and
Cameron
,
A.
,
1980
, “
Effect of Asperities in Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication
,”
ASME J. Lubr. Technol.
,
102
, pp.
374
379
.
5.
Kaneta
,
M.
,
Sakai
,
T.
, and
Nishikawa
,
H.
,
1992
, “
Optical Interferometric Observations of the Effects of a Bump on Point Contact EHL
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
114
, pp.
779
784
.
6.
Kaneta
,
M.
,
Sakai
,
T.
, and
Nishikawa
,
H.
,
1993
, “
Effects of Surface Roughness on Point Contact EHL
,”
STLE Tribol. Trans.
,
36
(
4
), pp.
605
612
.
7.
Kaneta
,
M.
, and
Nishikawa
,
H.
,
1994
, “
Local Reduction in Thickness of Point EHL Contact Films Caused by a Transversely Oriented Moving Grove and Its Recovery
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
116
, pp.
635
639
.
8.
Tondo¨r
,
K.
, and
Jakobsen
,
J.
,
1992
, “
Interferometric Studies of Effects of Striated Roughness on Lubricant Film Thickness Under Elastohydrodynamic Conditions
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
114
, pp.
52
56
.
9.
Guanteng, G., Cann, P. M., Olver, A. V., and Spikes, H. A., 1999, “Mapping Surface Features in the Thin Film Lubrication Regime,” Lubrication at the Frontier, Proc. Leeds-Lyon Symp., Lyon, Elsevier.
10.
Guanteng
,
G.
,
Cann
,
P. M.
,
Olver
,
A. V.
, and
Spikes
,
H. A.
,
2000
, “
Lubricant Film Thickness in Rough Surface, Mixed Elastohydrodynamic Contact
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
122
, pp.
65
76
.
11.
Choo, J. W., Olver, A. V., and Spikes, H. A., 2000, “Influence of Surface Roughness Features on Mixed Film Lubrication,” Proc. 2nd World Tribology Congress, Vienna, 3–7 Sept. 2000; accepted for publication in Lubrication Science.
12.
Greenwood
,
J. A.
, and
Johnson
,
K. L.
,
1992
, “
The Behavior of Transverse Roughness in Sliding Elastohydrodynamically Lubricated Contacts
,”
Wear
,
153
, pp.
107
117
.
13.
Greenwood
,
J. A.
, and
Morales-Espejel
,
G. E.
,
1994
, “
The Behavior of Transverse Roughness in EHL Contacts
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part J: J. Eng. Tribol.
,
208
, pp.
121
132
.
14.
Hooke
,
C. J.
,
1998
, “
Surface Roughness Modification in Elastohydrodynamic Line Contacts Operating in the Elastic Piezoviscous Regime
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part J: J. Eng. Tribol.
,
212
, pp.
145
162
.
15.
Houpert, L. G., and Hamrock, B. J., 1986, “Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication Calculation Used as a Tool to Study Scuffing,” Proc. Symp. Leeds-Lyon, Lyon, Butterworths, pp. 146–156.
16.
Ai
,
X.
, and
Zheng
,
L.
,
1989
, “
A General Model for Micro-Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication and Its Full Numerical Solution
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
111
, pp.
569
576
.
17.
Kweh
,
C. C.
,
Evans
,
H. P.
, and
Snidle
,
R. W.
,
1989
, “
Micro-Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of an Elliptical Contact, With Transverse and Tri-Dimensional Roughness
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
111
, pp.
577
583
.
18.
Chang
,
L.
, and
Webster
,
M. N.
,
1991
, “
A Study of Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Rough Surfaces
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
113
, pp.
110
115
.
19.
Venner
,
C. H.
, and
Lubrecht
,
A. A.
,
1994
, “
Numerical Simulation of a Transverse Ridge in a Circular EHL Contact Under Rolling/Sliding
,”
Trans. ASME J. Tribol.
,
116
, pp.
751
761
.
20.
Venner, C. H., Couhier, F., Lubrecht, A. A., and Greenwood, J. A., 1996, “Amplitude Reduction of Waviness in Transient EHL Line Contacts,” Proc. Symp. Leeds-Lyon, Elsevier, pp. 103–112.
21.
Lubrecht
,
A. A.
,
Graille
,
D.
,
Venner
,
C. H.
, and
Greenwood
,
J. A.
,
1999
, “
Waviness Amplitude Reduction in Line Contacts Under Rolling-Sliding
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
120
, pp.
705
709
.
22.
Hooke
,
C. J.
, and
Venner
,
C. H.
,
2000
, “
Surface Roughness Attenuation in Line and Point Contacts
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part J: J. Eng. Tribol.
,
214
, pp.
439
444
.
23.
Elcoate
,
C. D.
,
Evans
,
H. R.
,
Hughes
,
T. G.
, and
Snidle
,
R. W.
,
2001
, “
Transient Elasto-Hydrodynamic Analysis Using a Novel Coupled Differential Deflection Method
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part J: J. Eng. Tribol.
,
J215 J4
, pp.
319
337
.
24.
Gustafsson
,
L.
,
Hoglu¨nd
,
E.
, and
Marklund
,
O.
,
1994
, “
Measuring Lubricant Film Thickness With Image Analysis
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part J: J. Eng. Tribol.
,
208
, pp.
199
205
.
25.
Cann
,
P. M.
,
Hutchinson
,
J.
, and
Spikes
,
H. A.
,
1996
, “
The Development of a Spacer Layer Imaging Method (SLIM) for Mapping Elastohydrodynamic Contacts
,”
Tribol. Trans.
,
39
, pp.
915
921
.
26.
Hartl
,
M.
,
Krupka
,
I.
, and
Liska
,
M.
,
1997
, “
Differential Colorimetry: Tools for Evaluation of Chromatic Interference Patterns
,”
Opt. Eng.
,
36
, pp.
1
6
.
27.
Glovnea
,
R. P.
, and
Spikes
,
H. A.
,
2000
, “
The Influence of Lubricant on Film Collapse Rate in High Pressure Thin Film Behavior During Sudden Halting of Motion
,”
Tribol. Trans.
,
43
,
731
739
.
28.
Johnston
,
G. J.
,
Wayte
,
R.
, and
Spikes
,
H. A.
,
1991
, “
The Measurement and Study of Very Thin Lubricant Films in Concentrated Contacts
,”
Tribol. Trans.
,
34
, pp.
187
194
.
29.
Smeeth
,
M.
, and
Spikes
,
H. A.
,
1997
, “
Central and Minimum Elastohydrodynamic Film Thickness at High Contact Pressure
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
119
, pp.
291
296
.
30.
LaFountain, A. R., 1999, “The Behavior of Lubricant Blends in Elastohydrodynamic Contact,” Ph.D. thesis, University of London.
31.
Olver, A. V., Guangteng, G., and Spikes, H. A., 2000, “Film Thickness and Pressure in Micro-EHD Contacts,” Thinning Films and Tribological Interfaces, D. Dowson et al., eds., Elsevier, pp. 503–510.
32.
Venner, C. H., and Lubrecht, A. A., 2000, Multilevel Methods in Lubrication, Elsevier.
33.
Cameron, A., 1966, The Principles of Lubrication, Longmans Green and Co. Ltd., London.
You do not currently have access to this content.