Present understanding of the mechanisms of lubrication and the load carrying capacity of lubricant films mainly relies on models in which the Reynolds equation is used to describe the flow. The narrow gap assumption is a key element in its derivation from the Navier Stokes equations. However, the tendency in applications is that lubricated contacts have to operate at smaller film thickness levels, and because engineering surfaces are never perfectly smooth, locally in the film this narrow gap assumption may violated. In addition to this geometric limitation of the validity of the Reynolds equation may come a piezoviscous and compressibility related limitation. In this paper the accuracy of the predictions of the Reynolds model in relation to the local geometry of the gap is investigated. A numerical solution algorithm for the flow in a narrow gap has been developed based on the Stokes equations. For a model problem the differences between the pressure and velocity fields according to the Stokes model and the Reynolds equation have been investigated. The configuration entails a lower flat surface together with an upper surface (flat or parabolic) in which a local defect (single asperity) of known geometry has been embedded. It is investigated how the magnitude of the differences develops as a function of the geometric parameters of the film and the feature. Finally, it is discussed to what extend for these problems a perturbation approach can provide accurate corrections to be applied to the Reynolds solution.
Issue Section:
Technical Papers
1.
Reynolds
, O.
, 1886
, “On the Theory of Lubrication and Its Application to Mr. Beauchamps Tower’s Experiments, Including an Experimental Determination of the Viscosity of Olive Oil
,” Phil. Trans. of the Royal Society
, 177
, pp. 157
–234
.2.
Elrod
, H. G.
, 1979
, “A General Theory for Laminar Lubrication With Reynolds Roughness
,” ASME J. Lubr. Technol.
, 101
, pp. 8
–14
.3.
Tzeng
, S. T.
, and Saibel
, E.
, 1967
, “Surface Roughness Effects on Slider Bearing Lubrication
,” ASLE Trans.
, 10
, pp. 334
–338
.4.
Tzeng
, S. T.
, and Saibel
, E.
, 1967
, “On the Effects of Surface Roughness in the Hydrodynamic Lubrication Theory of a Short Journal Bearing
,” Wear
, 10
, pp. 179
–184
.5.
Christensen
, H.
, 1970
, “Stochastic Models for Hydrodynamic Lubrication of Rough Surfaces
,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng.
, 184
(1
), pp. 1013
–1026
.6.
Christensen
, H.
, 1971
, “Some Aspects of the Functional Influence of Surface Roughness in Lubrication
,” Wear
, 17
, pp. 149
–163
.7.
Christensen, H., and Tonder, K., 1971, “The Hydrodynamic Lubrication of Rough Bearing Surfaces of Finite Width,” ASME J. Tribol., pp. 324–330.
8.
Christensen, H., and Tonder, K., 1973, “The Hydrodynamic Lubrication of Rough Journal Bearings,” ASME J. Tribol., pp. 166–172.
9.
Elrod, H. G., 1973, “Thin-Film Lubrication Theory for Newtonian Fluids With Surfaces Possessing Striated Roughness or Grooving,” ASME J. Lubr. Technol., pp. 484–489.
10.
Elrod, H. G., 1977, “A Review of Theories for Fluid Dynamic Effects of Roughness on Laminar Lubricating Films,” Proceedings of the 4th Leeds Lyon Symposium on Tribology, Mechanical Engineering Publications, pp. 11–26.
11.
Cheng
, H. S.
, and Dyson
, A.
, 1977
, “Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Circumferentially-Ground Rough Disks
,” ASLE Trans.
, 21
, pp. 25
–40
.12.
Chow, L. S. H., and Cheng, H. S., 1976, “The Effect of Surface Roughness on the Average Film Thickness Between Lubricated Rollers,” ASME J. Tribol., pp. 177–124.
13.
Chow
, P. L.
, and Saibel
, E. A.
, 1978
, “On the Roughness Effect in Hydrodynamic Lubrication
,” ASME J. Tribol.
, 100
, pp. 176
–180
.14.
Sun
, D. C.
, 1978
, “On the Effects of Two-Dimensional Reynolds Roughness in Hydrodynamic Lubrication
,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
, 364
, pp. 89
–106
.15.
Phan-Thien
, N.
, 1981
, “On the Effects of Parallel and Transverse Stationary Random Surface Roughness in Hydrodynamics Lubrication
,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
, 374
, pp. 569
–591
.16.
Phan-Thien
, N.
, 1982
, “Hydrodynamic Lubrication of Rough Surfaces
,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
, 383
, pp. 439
–446
.17.
Phan-Thien
, N.
, 1982
, “On the Mean Reynolds Equation in the Presence of Homogeneous Random Surface Roughness
,” ASME J. Tribol.
, 49
, pp. 476
–480
.18.
Phan-Thien
, N.
, and Atkinson
, J. D.
, 1982
, “On the Effects of Homogeneous Reynolds Roughness in a Two-Dimensional Slider Bearing With Exponential Film Thickness
,” ASME J. Tribol.
, 104
, pp. 220
–226
.19.
Prakash
, J.
, 1984
, “On the Lubrication of Rough Rollers
,” ASME J. Tribol.
, 106
, pp. 211
–217
.20.
Patir
, N.
, and Cheng
, H. S.
, 1978
, “An Average Flow Model for Determining Effects of Three-Dimensional Roughness on Partial Hydrodynamic Lubrication
,” ASME J. Tribol.
, 100
, pp. 12
–17
.21.
Patir
, N.
, and Cheng
, H. S.
, 1979
, “Application of Average Flow Model to Lubrication Between Rough Sliding Surfaces
,” ASME J. Tribol.
, 101
, pp. 220
–230
.22.
Teale
, J. L.
, and Lebeck
, A. O.
, 1980
, “An Evaluation of the Average Flow Model for Surface Roughness Effects in Lubrication
,” ASME J. Tribol.
, 106
, pp. 440
–447
.23.
Tripp
, J. H.
, 1983
, “Surface Roughness Effects in Hydrodynamic Lubrication: The Flow Factor Method
,” ASME J. Tribol.
, 105
, pp. 458
–465
.24.
Sadeghi
, F.
, and Sui
, P. C.
, 1989
, “Compressible Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Rough Surfaces
,” ASME J. Tribol.
, 99
, pp. 2
–6
.25.
Patir, N., and Cheng, H. S., 1978, “Effect of Surface Roughness Orientation on the Central Film Thickness in EHD Contacts,” Proc. 1977 Leeds Lyon Symposium on Tribology, Elsevier, pp. 15–21.
26.
Tripp, J. H., and Hamrock, B. J., 1985, “Surface Roughness Effects in Elastohydrodynamic Contacts,” Proc. 1984 Leeds Lyon Symposium on Tribology, Elsevier, pp. 30–39.
27.
Goglia
, P. R.
, Cusano
, C.
, and Conry
, T. F.
, 1984
, “The Effects of Irregularities on the Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Sliding Line Contacts: Part I—Single Irregularities
,” ASME J. Tribol.
, 106
, pp. 104
–112
.28.
Goglia
, P. R.
, Cusano
, C.
, and Conry
, T. F.
, 1984
, “The Effects of Irregularities on the Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Sliding Line Contacts: Part II—Wavy Surfaces
,” ASME J. Tribol.
, 107
, pp. 113
–119
.29.
Venner, C. H., Kaneta, M., and Lubrecht, A. A., 2000, “Surface Roughness in Elastohydrodynamically Lubricated Contacts,” Proceedings of the 26th Leeds-Lyon Conference, Leeds, Sept. 1999, Elsevier Tribology Series, 38, Dowson et al., eds., pp. 25–36.
30.
Venner, C. H., Kaneta, M., Nishikawa, H., and Jacod, B., 2001, “Effects of Waviness on the Film Thickness in a Circular EHL Contact Under Rolling/Sliding,” Proceedings Int. Tribology Conference, Nagasaki 2000, Japanese Society of Tribologists, ISBN 4-9900139-4-8, pp. 631–636.
31.
Wijnant
, Y. H.
, Venner
, C. H.
, and Larsson
, R.
, 1999
, “Effects of Structural Vibrations on the Film Thickness in an EHL Circular Contact
,” ASME J. Tribol.
, 121
, pp. 259
–264
.32.
Kaneta
, M.
, 1992
, “Effects of Surface Roughness in Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication
,” JSME Int. J., Ser. III
, 35
(4
), pp. 535
–546
.33.
Venner
, C. H.
, and Lubrecht
, A. A.
, 1994
, “Numerical Simulation of a Transverse Ridge in a Circular EHL Contact Under Rolling/Sliding
,” ASME J. Tribol.
, 116
, pp. 751
–761
.34.
Sun, D. C., and Chen, K. K., 1977, “First Effects of Stokes Roughness on Hydrodynamic Lubrication,” ASME J. Lubr. Technol., pp. 2–9.
35.
Phan-Thien
, N.
, 1981
, “On the Effects of the Reynolds and Stokes Surface Roughnesses in a Two-Dimensional Slider Bearing
,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
, 377
, pp. 349
–362
.36.
Myllerup, C. M., and Hamrock, B. J., 1992, “Local Effects in Thin Film Lubrication,” Proceedings of the 19th Leeds Lyon Symposium on Tribology, D. Dowson et al., eds., Elsevier Tribology Series, 25, pp. 39–57.
37.
Myllerup
, C. M.
, and Hamrock
, B. J.
, 1994
, “Perturbation Approach to Hydrodynamic Lubrication Theory
,” ASME J. Tribol.
, 116
, pp. 110
–118
.38.
Noordmans, J., “Solutions of Highly Anisotropic Stokes Equations for Lubrication Problems,” Proceedings of the Second ECCOMAS Conference on Numerical Methods in Engineering, 9–13 September 1996, Paris, France, J. A. Desideri, P. Le Tallec, E. Onate, J. Periaux, E. Stein, eds., John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 960–965.
39.
Scha¨fer, C. T., Giese, P., and Woolley, N. H., 1999, “Elastohydrodynamically Lubricated Line Contact Based on the Navier-Stokes Equations,” Proceedings of the 26th Leeds Lyon Conference on Tribology, Elsevier Tribology Series, D. Dowson et al., eds., 38, pp. 57–69.
40.
Almqvist, T., 2001, “Numerical Simulation of Elastohydrodynamic and Hydrodynamic Lubrication Using the Navier-Stokes and Reynolds Equations,” Licentiate Thesis, Lulea¨ University of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sweden.
41.
Bair
, S.
, Khonsari
, M.
, and Winer
, W. O.
, 1998
, “High-Pressure Rheology of Lubricants and Limitations of the Reynolds Equation
,” Tribol. Int.
, 31
(10
), pp. 573
–586
.42.
Odyck van, D. E. A., 2001, “Stokes Flow in Thin Films,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente, The Netherlands.
43.
Odyck van, D. E. A., and Venner, C. H., 2001, “Compressible Stokes Flow in Thin Films,” internal report, University of Twente, Enschede.
44.
Oosterlee, K., 1993. “Robust Multigrid Methods for the Steady and Unsteady Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations in General Coordinates,” Ph.D. thesis, Delft University, The Netherlands.
45.
Warsi, Z. U. A., 1993, Fluid Dynamics, Theoretical and Computational Approaches, CRC Press.
46.
Harlow
, F.
, and Welch
, J.
, 1965
, “Numerical Calculation of Time-Dependent Viscous Incompressible Flow
,” Phys. Fluids
, 8
, pp. 2182
–2189
.47.
Richtmyer, R. D., and Morton, K. W., 1967, “Difference Methods for Initial Value Problems,” 2nd ed., Wiley-Interscience, London.
48.
Hackbusch, W., 1992. “Elliptic Differential Equations, Theory and Numerical Treatment,” Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, 18, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
49.
Brandt, A., 1982, “Guide to Multigrid Development,” Multigrid Methods: Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 960, W. Hackbusch and U. Trottenberg, eds., Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 220–312.
50.
Stu¨ben, K., and Trottenberg, U., 1982, “Multigrid Methods: Fundamental Algorithms, Model Problem Analysis and Applications,” Multigrid Methods: Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 960, W. Hackbusch and U. Trottenberg, eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 1–176.
51.
Hackbusch, W., 1985, Multi-Grid Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
52.
Briggs, W. L., 1987, A Multigrid Tutorial, SIAM.
53.
Wesseling, P., 1992, An Introduction to Multigrid Methods, John Wiley & Sons.
54.
Joppich, W., 1996, Grundlagen der Mehrgittermethode, GMD, Sankt Augustin.
55.
Venner, C. H., and Lubrecht, A. A., 2000, Multigrid Methods in Lubrication, Elseviers Tribology Series, 37, D. Dowson, ed., ISBN 0-444-50503-2, Elsevier, New York.
56.
Vanka
, S. P.
, 1985
, “Block-Implicit Calculation of Steady Turbulent Recirculating Flows
,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
, 28
, pp. 2093
–2103
.57.
Moffat
, H. K.
, 1964
, “Viscous and Resistive Eddies Near a Sharp Corner
,” J. Fluid Mech.
, 18
, pp. 1
–18
.Copyright © 2003
by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.
