The engagement of a wet clutch with skewed surface roughness was investigated. A Weibull asperity height distribution rather than a Gaussian one was utilized in the asperity contact pressure model. The combined effects of surface roughness and skewness on the friction coefficient were studied for new, run-in and glazed wet friction materials. The results show that the engagement time predicted by the Weibull distribution is greater than that obtained using the Gaussian distribution. A torque spike at the beginning of engagement occurs using the Weibull distribution by taking the skewness into account. A positively sloped curve of friction coefficient versus velocity can reduce the torque increase near the end of the engagement. The strain value at the end of engagement obtained by including the skewness is lower than that predicted by excluding it. The surface topography and the friction characteristics change with the engagement wear and thermal glazing. The torque response and the phase plane are presented for the run-in and the glazed wet friction materials as a function of surface roughness, skewness, and friction characteristic.

1.
Natsumeda
,
S.
, and
Miyoshi
,
T.
,
1994
, “
Numerical Simulation of Engagement of Paper Based Wet Clutch Facing
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
116
, pp.
232
237
.
2.
Berger
,
E. J.
,
Sadeghi
,
F.
, and
Krousgrill
,
C. M.
,
1997
, “
Analytical and Numerical Modeling of Engagement of Rough, Permeable, Grooved Wet Clutches
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
119
, pp.
143
148
.
3.
Holgerson
,
M.
,
1997
, “
Apparatus for Measurement of Engagement Characteristics of a Wet Clutch
,”
Wear
,
213
, pp.
140
147
.
4.
Yang, Y., Lam, R. C., and Fujii, T., 1998, “Prediction of Torque Response During the Engagement of Wet Friction Clutch,” SAE Technical Paper, No. 981097, pp. 233–243.
5.
Jang
,
J. M.
, and
Khonsari
,
M. M.
,
1999
, “
Thermal Characteristics of a Wet Clutch
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
121
, pp.
610
617
.
6.
Berger
,
E. J.
,
Sadeghi
,
F.
, and
Krousgrill
,
C. M.
,
1996
, “
Finite Element Modeling of Engagement of Rough and Grooved Wet Clutches
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
118
, pp.
137
146
.
7.
Berger
,
E. J.
, and
Sadeghi
,
F.
,
1997
, “
Torque Transmission Characteristics of Automatic Transmission Wet Clutches: Experimental Results and Numerical Comparison
,”
STLE Tribol. Trans.
,
40
, pp.
539
548
.
8.
Greenwood
,
J.
, and
Williamson
,
J.
,
1966
, “
Contact of Nominally Flat Surfaces
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
,
295
, pp.
300
319
.
9.
Willermet, P. A., 1998, “Topics in Transmission Tribology,” presented at STLE Annual Meeting, Detroit, MI, May 17–21.
10.
Davis
,
C. L.
,
Sadeghi
,
F.
, and
Krousgrill
,
C. M.
,
2000
, “
A Simplified Approach to Modeling Thermal Effects in Wet Clutch Engagement: Analytical and Experimental Comparison
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
122
, No.
1
, pp.
110
118
.
11.
Patir
,
N.
, and
Cheng
,
H. S.
,
1979
, “
Application of Average Flow Model to Lubrication Between Rough Sliding Surfaces
,”
ASME J. Lubr. Technol.
,
101
, pp.
220
230
.
12.
McCool
,
J. I.
,
2000
, “
Extending the Capability of the Greenwood Williamson Microcontact Model
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
122
, pp.
496
502
.
13.
Beavars
,
G.
, and
Joseph
,
D.
,
1967
, “
Boundary Conditions at a Naturally Permeable Wall
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
30
, pp.
197
207
.
You do not currently have access to this content.