An analytical model is developed in this paper which relates the major component of micro-EHL pressure responses to lubricant properties, roughness geometry, contact load, velocity, and slide-to-roll ratio. Analyses are then conducted showing the effects of system parameters on this micro-EHL pressure. For a Newtonian lubricant with an exponential pressure-viscosity law, this pressure would be large unless the contact practically operates right at pure rolling. The magnitude of the pressure rippling is largely independent of the slide-to-roll ratio, and smaller wavelength components of the surface roughness generate larger micro-EHL pressures. With less dramatic pressure-viscosity enhancement such as the two-slope model, the micro-EHL pressure is generally smaller and sensitive to the slide-to-roll ratio, larger with higher sliding in the contact. Furthermore, this pressure-viscosity model yields a micro-EHL pressure that becomes vanishingly small corresponding to sufficiently small wavelength components of the roughness. For a shear-thinning non-Newtonian lubricant, such as the Eyring model, with an exponential pressure-viscosity law, substantially less micro-EHL pressure rippling is generally developed than its Newtonian counterpart. While the pressure rippling is insensitive of the slide-to-roll ratio like its Newtonian counterpart, it vanishes corresponding to sufficiently small wavelength components of the roughness. The analyses revealed that a key factor resulting in a smaller micro-EHL pressure with the two-slope model or the Eyring model is the lower viscosity or shear-thinned effective viscosity in the loaded region of the contact. Since EHL traction is proportional to this viscosity, contacts lubricated with oils exhibiting higher traction behavior would develop larger micro-EHL pressures and thus would be more vulnerable to fatigue failure.

1.
Ai
X.
, and
Cheng
H. S.
,
1994
, “
A Transient EHL Analysis for Line Contacts with Measured Surface Roughness Using Multigrid Technique
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY
, Vol.
116
, No.
2
, pp.
549
558
.
2.
Allen
C. W.
,
Townsend
D. P.
, and
Zaretsky
E. V.
,
1970
, “
Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of A Spinning Ball in Nonconforming Groove
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGY
, Vol.
92
, No.
1
, pp.
89
96
.
3.
Chang
L.
,
1995
, “
Deterministic Modeling and Numerical Simulation of Lubrication between Rough Surfaces—A Review of Recent Development
,”
Wear
, Vol.
184
, pp.
155
160
.
4.
Chang
L.
, and
Zhao
W.
,
1995
a, “
Fundamental Differences between Newtonian and Non-Newtonian Micro-EHL Results
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY
, Vol.
117
, No.
l
, pp.
29
35
.
5.
Chang
L.
, and
Zhao
W.
,
1995
b, “
Wavelength Dependence of Micro-EHL Pressure Rippling with Random Surface-Roughness Profiles
,”
Tribology Transactions
, Vol.
38
, No.
2
, pp.
389
395
.
6.
Conry
T. F.
,
Wang
S.
, and
Cusano
C. C.
,
1987
, “
A Reynolds-Eyring Equation for Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication in Line Contacts
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY
, Vol.
109
, No.
4
, pp.
648
658
.
7.
Dowson, D., and Toyoda, S., 1977, “A Central Film Thickness Formula for Elastohydrodynamic Line Contacts,” Proc. 5th Leeds/Lyon Symp., Mechanical Engineering Publications, pp. 60–67.
8.
Greenwood
J. A.
, and
Johnson
K. L.
,
1992
, “
The Behavior of Transverse Roughness in Sliding Elastohydrodynamically Lubricated Contacts
,”
Wear
, Vol.
153
, pp.
107
117
.
9.
Greenwood
J. A.
, and
Morrales-Espejel
G. E.
,
1994
, “
The Behaviour of Transverse Roughness in EHL Contacts
,”
Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs.
, Part J, Vol.
208
, pp.
121
132
.
10.
Johnson, K. L., 1985, Contact Mechanics, Cambridge University Press.
11.
Johnson
K. L.
, and
Tevaarwerk
J. L.
,
1977
, “
Shear Behavior of Elastohydrodynamic Oil Films
,”
Proc. Royal Society, London, Series A
, Vol.
356
, pp.
215
236
.
12.
Lubrecht
A. A.
,
ten Napel
W. E.
, and
Bosma
R.
,
1988
, “
The Influence of Longitudinal and Transverse Roughness on the Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Circular Contacts
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY
, Vol.
110
, No.
2
, pp.
421
426
.
13.
Venner
C. H.
, and
ten Napel
W. E.
,
1992
, “
Surface Roughness Effects in an EHL Line Contact
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY
, Vol.
114
, No.
2
, pp.
616
622
.
14.
Zhu
D.
, and
Ai
X.
,
1996
, “
Point Contact EHL Based on Optically Measured 3-Dimensional Rough Surfaces
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY
, Vol.
119
, No.
3
, pp.
375
384
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.