In theoretical modeling of contact mechanics, a homogeneously, isotropically rough surface is usually assumed to be a flat plane covered with asperities of a Gaussian summit-height distribution. This assumption yields satisfactory results between theoretical predictions and experimental measurements of the physical characteristics, such as thermal/electrical contact conductance and friction coefficient. However, lack of theoretical basis of this assumption motivates further study in surface modeling. This paper presents a theoretical investigation by statistical mechanics to determine surface roughness in terms of the most probable distribution of surface asperities. Based upon the surface roughness measurements as statistical constraints, the Boltzmann statistical model derives a distribution equivalent to Gaussian. The Boltzmann statistical mechanics derivation in this paper provides a rigorous validation of the Gaussian summit-height assumption presently in use for study of rough surfaces.

1.
Archard, J. F., 1974, “Surface Topography and Tribology,” Tribology International, pp. 213–220.
2.
Bhushan, B., 1990, Tribology and Mechanics of Magnetic Storage Devices, Springer-Verlag, New York.
3.
Binnig
G.
, and
Rohrer
H.
,
1983
, “
Scanning Tunnelling Microscopy
,”
Surface Sciences
, Vol.
126
, pp.
236
244
.
4.
D’yachenko, P. E., Tolkacheva, N. N., Andreev, G. A., and Karpova, T. M., 1964, The Actual Contact Area between Touching Surfaces, Consultants Bureau, New York.
5.
Fletcher
L. S.
,
1988
, “
Recent Developments in Contact Conductance Heat Transfer
,”
ASME Journal of Heat Transfer
, Vol.
110
, pp.
1059
1070
.
6.
Ford
I. J.
,
1993
, “
Roughness Effect on Friction for Multi-Asperity Contact between Surfaces
,”
Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics
, Vol.
26
, pp.
2219
2225
.
7.
Greenwood, J. A., and Williamson, J. B. P., 1966, “Contact of Nominally Flat Surfaces,” Proceedings of the Royal Society (London), Series A295, pp. 300–319.
8.
Gupta
P. K.
, and
Cook
N. H.
,
1972
, “
Statistical Analysis of Mechanical Interaction of Rough Surfaces
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGY
, Vol.
94
, pp.
19
26
.
9.
Holm, R., 1981, Electric Contacts: Theory and Application, 4th Edition, Springer-Verlag, New York.
10.
Hsieh
C. K.
,
1974
, “
A Critical Evaluation of Surface Geometrical Parameters For a Nominally Flat Surface Model
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGY
, Vol.
96
, pp.
638
639
.
11.
Leung, M., 1995, “Prediction of Thermal Contact Conductance by Statistical Mechanics,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
12.
McCool
J. I.
,
1986
, “
Comparison of Models for the Contact of Rough Surfaces
,”
Wear
, Vol.
107
, pp.
37
60
.
13.
Perry, D. M., Moran, P. J., and Robinson, G. M., 1984, “Three-Dimensional Surface Metrology of Magnetic Recording Materials Through Direct Phase Detecting Microscopic Interferometry,” Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Video and Data Recording, University of Southampton.
14.
Sato
H.
, and
Ohori
M.
,
1982
, “
Surface Roughness Measurement by Scanning Electron Microscope
,”
Annual CIRP
, Vol.
31
, pp.
457
462
.
15.
Sonntag, R. E., and Van Wylen, G. J., 1966, Fundamental of Statistical Thermodynamics, Wiley, New York.
16.
Thomas, T. R., 1982, Rough Surfaces, Longman, London.
17.
Tsukada
T.
, and
Sasajima
K.
,
1981
, “
A Three-Dimensional Measuring Technique for Surface Asperities
,”
Wear
, Vol.
71
, pp.
1
14
.
18.
Williamson
J. B. P.
,
1967–68
, “
Microphotography of Surfaces
,”
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers
, Vol.
182
, Pt. 3K, pp.
21
30
.
19.
Williamson, J. B. P., 1969, “The Shape of Solid Surfaces,” Surface Mechanics, Proceedings of the ASME Annual Winter Meeting, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 24–35.
20.
Wyant
J. C.
,
Koliopoulos
C. L.
,
Bhushan
B.
, and
Basila
D.
,
1986
, “
Development of a Three-Dimensional Noncontact Digital Optical Profiler
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY
, Vol.
108
, pp.
1
8
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.