Numerical simulations of the lubrication of rough surfaces have been done using the Finite Element Method. Only pure pressure flow conditions have been considered. The correlation coefficient between pressure and height, pressure and height gradients etc. are presented for two different isotropic suifaces. For comparison, one slightly anisotropic surface and one surface with pure transverse roughness have also been investigated. The three-dimensional surface roughnesses have been produced numerically using Finite Impulse Response (FIR) filters and FFT. The only two significant correlations are between the pressure and the height gradient in x-direction and between the height and the pressure gradient in x-direction. The correlation coefficients can be used to apply better boundary conditions when analyzing the lubrication of a rough bearing, and how this can be done has been roughly explained.

1.
Box, Hunter and Hunter, 1978, Statistics for Experimenters, Wiley, New York.
2.
Christensen
H.
,
1969–70
Stochastic Models for Hydrodynamic Lubrication of Rough Surfaces
,”
Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs.
, Vol.
184
, Part 1, no.
55
, pp.
1013
1026
.
3.
Christensen, H., and To̸nder, K., 1969, “Tribology of Rough Surfaces: Stochastic Models of Hydrodynamic Lubrication,” 1969-11 SINTEF Rep. No. 10/69-18.
4.
Elrod
H. G.
,
1979
, “
A General Theory for Laminar Lubrication With Reynolds Roughness
,”
Trans. ASME
, Vol.
1101
, Jan. pp.
8
14
.
5.
Hu
Y. Z.
, and
To̸nder
K.
,
1992
, “
Simulation of 3-D Random Surface by 2-D Digital Filter and Fourier Analysis
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufact.
, Vol.
32
, No.
1/2
, pp.
83
90
.
6.
Lunde, L., and To̸nder, K., 1994, “Numerical Simulation of the Effects of Three Dimensional Roughness on Hydrodynamic Lubrication—Effect of Boundary Conditions,” Proc. of the 4th Int. Trib. Conference Austrib ’94 Australia, pp. 113–118.
7.
Mitsuya
Y.
, and
Fukui
S.
,
1986
, “
Stokes Roughness Effects on Hydrodynamic Lubrication. Part 1. Comparison Between Incompressible and Compressible Lubrication Films
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY
, Apr., Vol.
108
, pp.
151
158
.
8.
Patir
N.
,
1978
, “
A Numerical Procedure for Random Generation of Rough Surfaces
,”
Wear
, Vol.
47
, No.
2
, Apr., pp.
263
277
.
9.
Patir
N.
, and
Cheng
H. S.
,
1978
, “
An Average Flow Model for Determining Effects of Three-Dimensional Roughness on Partial Hydrodynamic Lubrication.
ASME JOURNAL OF LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGY
, Vol.
100
, No.
1
, Jan., pp.
12
17
.
10.
Peklenik
J.
1967
, “
New Developments in Surface Characterization and Measurement by Means of Random Process Analysis
,”
Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs.
, Vol.
182
, Part 3k, pp.
108
126
.
11.
Reddi
M. M.
,
1969
, “
Finite Element Solution of the Incompressible Lubrication Problem
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGY
, Vol.
91
, No.
3
, July, pp.
524
533
.
12.
Sun
D. C.
, and
Chen
K. K.
,
1977
, “
First Effects of Stokes Roughness on Hydrodynamic Lubrication
,”
Trans. ASME JOURNAL OF LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGY
, Vol.
99
, 1, pp.
2
9
.
13.
Teale
J. L.
, and
Lebeck
A. O.
,
1980
, “
An Evaluation of the Average Flow Model for Surface Roughness Effects in Lubrication
,”
Trans. ASME
, Vol.
102
, July, pp.
360
367
.
14.
Tripp
J. H.
,
1983
, “
Surface Roughness Effects in Hydrodynamic Lubrication: The Flow Factor Method
,”
Trans. ASME
, Vol.
105
, July, pp.
458
465
.
15.
To̸nder, K., 1980, “Simulation of the Lubrication of Isotropically Rough Surfaces,” ASLE Trans. Vol. 23, July.
16.
To̸nder, K., 1984, “Roughness Effects on Thin-Film Gas Lubrication—a State-Of-The-Art Review,” ASLE Special Publication 16, pp. 183–192.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.