1.
El-Helieby
S. O. A.
, and
Rowe
G. W.
,
1980
, “
A Quantitative Comparison Between Residual Stresses and Fatigue Properties of Surface-Ground Bearing Steel
,”
Wear
, Vol.
58
, pp.
155
172
.
2.
Lubrecht, A., Jacobson, B., and Ioannides, E., 1990a, “Lunberg-Palmgren Revisited,” Proc. of Seminar, “Rolling Bearings-Towards the 21st Century,” Tribology Group, Inst. of Mechanical Engineers.
3.
Lubrecht, A., Venner, C., Lane, S., Jacobson, B., and Ioannides, E., 1990b, Surface Damage-Comparisons of Theorectical and Experimental Lives of Rolling Bearings,” Proc. Japan International Tribology Conf., Nagoya, Japan.
4.
Zaretsky
E. V.
,
1987
, “
Fatigue Criterion to System Design, Life and Reliability
,”
Journal of Propulsion and Power, Trans. AIAA
, Vol.
3
, No.
1
, pp.
76
83
.
5.
Zaretsky
E. V.
,
1994
, “
Design for Life, Plan for Death
,”
Machine Design
, Vol.
66
, No.
15
, pp.
55
59
.
6.
Zaretsky, E. V., Poplawski, J. V., and Peters, S. M., 1995, “Comparison of Life Theories for Rolling-Element Bearings,” STLE paper no. 95-AM-3F-3 (to be published in STLE Transactions, Vol. 39, No. 1, Jan. 1996).
7.
Zwirlein, O., and Schlicht, H., 1982, “Rolling Contact Fatigue Mechanisms—Accelerated Testing Versus Field Performances,” Rolling Contact Fatigue Testing of Bearing Steels, J. J. C. Hoo, ed., ASTM STP-771, American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 358–379.
This content is only available via PDF.

Article PDF first page preview

Article PDF first page preview
You do not currently have access to this content.