Due to the increasing power requirement and the limited available space in vehicles, placing the heat exchanger at the roof or the underbody of vehicles might increase the possibility to handle the cooling requirement. A new configuration of the heat exchanger has to be developed to accommodate with the position change. In this paper, a countercurrent heat exchanger is developed for position on the roof of the vehicle compartment. In order to find an appropriate configuration of fins with high thermal performance on the air side, the computational fluid dynamics approach is applied for a comparative study among louver fin, wavy fin, and pin fin by using ANSYS FLUENT software. It is found that the louver fin performs high thermal performance and low pressure drop. Thus, the louver fin is chosen to be the configuration of the countercurrent flow heat exchanger. It is also found that the countercurrent flow heat exchanger presents higher heat transfer coefficient than the cross flow heat exchanger. Furthermore, the overall size and the air pumping power of the countercurrent flow heat exchanger are lower than those in the cross flow heat exchanger. Several suggestions and recommendations are highlighted.

References

References
1.
Hountalas
,
D. T.
,
Mavropoulos
,
G. C.
, and
Binder
,
K. B.
,
2008
, “
Effect of Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) Temperature for Various EGR Rates on Heavy Duty DI Diesel Engine Performance and Emissions
,”
Energy
,
33
, pp.
272
283
.10.1016/j.energy.2007.07.002
2.
Doughty
,
D. H.
,
Butler
,
P. C.
,
Jungst
,
R. G.
, and
Roth
,
E. P.
,
2002
, “
Lithium Battery Thermal Models
,”
J. Power Sources
,
110
, pp.
357
363
.10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00198-2
3.
Khaled
,
M.
,
Harambat
,
F.
, and
Peerhossaini
,
H.
,
2010
, “
Underhood Thermal Management: Temperature and Heat Flux Measurements and Physical Analysis
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
,
30
, pp.
590
598
.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2009.11.003
4.
Larsson
,
L.
,
Wiklund
,
T.
, and
Löfdahl
,
L.
,
2011
, “
Cooling Performance Investigation of a Rear Mounted Cooling Package for Heavy Vehicles
,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2011-01-0174.
5.
Malvicino
,
C.
,
Mattiello
,
F.
, and
Seccardini
,
R.
,
2011
, “
Flat Heat Exchangers
,”
Proceedings of the 10th Vehicle Thermal Management Systems Conference and Exhibition
,
Gaydon
,
Warwickshire, UK
, pp.
91
98
.
6.
Malvicino
,
C.
,
Sciullo
,
F. D.
,
Cuniberti
,
M.
,
Vestrelli
,
F.
, and
Beltramelli
,
F.
,
2011
, “
Dual Level Vehicle Heat Rejection System
,”
Proceedings of the 10th Vehicle Thermal Management Systems Conference & Exhibition
,
Gaydon
,
Warwickshire, UK
, pp.
473
480
.
7.
Shah
,
R. K.
, and
Sekulic
,
D. P.
,
2003
,
Fundamentals of Heat Exchanger Design
,
John Wiley & Sons
,
New York
.
8.
Kays
,
W. M.
, and
London
,
A. L.
,
1995
,
Compact Heat Exchangers
,
3rd ed.
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
9.
Pope
,
S. B.
,
2000
,
Turbulent Flows
,
Cambridge University
,
Cambridge, England
.10.1017/CBO9780511840531
10.
ANSYS, Inc.
,
2009
, ANSYS FLUENT 12.0—Theory Guide.
11.
Tannehill
,
J. C.
,
Anderson
,
D. A.
, and
Pletcher
,
R. H.
,
1997
,
Computational Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer
,
2nd ed.
,
Taylor & Francis
,
London
.
12.
Versteeg
,
H. K.
, and
Malalasekera
,
W.
,
2007
,
An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics
,
2nd ed.
,
Pearson Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
.
You do not currently have access to this content.