One of the problems frequently encountered in a coal gasifier operation is fuel injector failure. Operating in extreme high pressure and high temperature, the typical fuel injector life span is 6–12 months. Numerical simulations are performed to study the flow and temperature fields in the vicinity of the injector tip and the metal temperature of two different fuel injector designs—one with a conical-nozzle tip and the other with a blunt tip—in a dry-fed, entrained-flow coal gasifier. The complete 3D Navier–Stokes equations are solved. The instantaneous gasification model is employed to simulate three global heterogeneous reactions and three homogeneous reactions, including volatile combustion. The results show that the two different injectors give very different temperature and species distributions inside the gasifier. In the gasifier with the conical injector tip, the highest temperature inside the gasifier occurs at the center of the gasifier, whereas in the gasifier with the blunt-tip injector, the highest temperature occurs near the wall. There is a potential of flash-back combustion in the nozzle at the tip of the conical injector due to its premixing feature of fuel and oxidant in the nozzle. The highest temperatures on both injectors are the same, which is around 1600 K. However, the highest temperature on the conical-tip injector is concentrated at one location with an extended region of 30 mm between 1600 K and 1100 K, whereas on the blunt-tip injector, hot spots are scattered and the hot region (1600–1100 K) only extends about 3 mm. Experimental results support the simulated results and has demonstrated a short life of the conical-tip fuel injector and much extended life for the blunt-tip fuel injector.

1.
Magnussen
,
B. F.
, and
Hjertager
,
B. H.
, 1976, “
On Mathematical Models of Turbulent Combustion With Special Emphasis on Soot Formation and Combustion
,”
Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Combustion
, pp.
719
729
.
2.
Lauder
,
B. E.
, and
Spalding
,
D. B.
, 1972,
Lectures in Mathematical Modeling of Turbulence
,
Academic
,
London, England
.
3.
Launder
,
B. E.
, and
Spalding
,
D. B.
, 1974, “
The Numerical Computation of Turbulent Flows
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
0045-7825,
3
, pp.
269
289
.
4.
Silaen
,
A.
, and
Wang
,
T.
, 2005, “
Simulation of Coal Gasification Process Inside a Two-Stage Gasifier
,”
Proceedings of the 22nd Pittsburgh Coal Conference
, Pittsburgh, PA, Paper No. 20-1.
5.
Silaen
,
A.
, and
Wang
,
T.
, 2006, “
Effects of Fuel Injection Angles on Performance of a Two-Stage Coal Gasifier
,”
Proceedings of the 23rd Pittsburgh Coal Conference
, Pittsburgh, PA, Paper No. 20-4.
6.
2006, FLUENT 6.3 User’s Guide.
7.
Smoot
,
D. L.
, and
Smith
,
P. J.
, 1985,
Coal Combustion and Gasification
,
Plenum
,
New York
.
8.
Faeth
,
G. M.
, 1987, “
Mixing, Transport and Combustion in Sprays
,”
Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.
0360-1285,
13
, pp.
293
345
.
9.
Silaen
,
A.
, and
Wang
,
T.
, 2009, “
Comparison of Instantaneous and Finite-Rate Gasification Models in an Entrained-Flow Coal Gasifier
,”
Proceedings of the 26th International Pittsburgh Coal Conference
, Pittsburgh, PA, Paper No. 14-3.
You do not currently have access to this content.