Future advanced turbine systems for electric power generation, based on coal-gasified fuels with $CO2$ capture and sequestration, are aimed for achieving higher cycle efficiency and near-zero emission. The most promising operating cycles being developed are hydrogen-fired cycle and oxyfuel cycle. Both cycles will likely have turbine working fluids significantly different from that of conventional air-based gas turbines. In addition, the oxyfuel cycle will have a turbine inlet temperature target at approximately 2030 K $(1760°C)$, significantly higher than the current level. This suggests that aerothermal control and cooling will play a critical role in realizing our nation’s future fossil power generation systems. This paper provides a computational analysis in comparing the internal cooling performance of a double-wall or skin-cooled airfoil to that of an equivalent serpentine-cooled airfoil. The present results reveal that the double-wall or skin-cooled approach produces superior performance than the conventional serpentine designs. This is particularly effective for the oxyfuel turbine with elevated turbine inlet temperatures. The effects of coolant-side internal heat transfer coefficient on the airfoil metal temperature in both hydrogen-fired and oxyfuel turbines are evaluated. The contribution of thermal barrier coatings toward overall thermal protection for turbine airfoil cooled under these two different cooling configurations is also assessed.

1.
International Energy Agency
, 2006, “
World Energy Outlook
,” IEA.
2.
Todd
,
D. M.
, 2000, “
Gas Turbine Improvements Enhance IGCC Viability
,”
Gasification Technologies Conference
, San Francisco, CA, Oct. 8–11.
3.
Dennis
,
R. A.
, and
Harp
,
R.
, “
Overview of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Fossil Energy Advanced Turbine Program for Coal Based Power Systems With Carbon Capture
,” ASME Paper No. GT2007-28338.
4.
Dennis
,
R. A.
, 2006, “
FE Research Direction—Thermal Barrier Coatings and Health Monitoring Techniques
,”
Workshop on Advanced Coating Materials and Technology for Extreme Environments, Pennsylvania State University
, State College, PA, Sept. 12–13.
5.
Alvin
,
M. A.
,
Pettit
,
F.
,
Meier
,
G.
,
Yanar
,
N.
,
Chyu
,
M.
,
Mazzotta
,
D.
,
Slaughter
,
W.
,
Karaivanov
,
V.
,
Kang
,
B.
,
Feng
,
C.
,
Chen
,
R.
, and
Fu
,
T. -C.
, 2007, “
Materials and Component Development for Advanced Turbine Systems
,”
EPRI Fifth International Conference on Advances in Materials Technology for Fossil Power Plants
, FL, October 3–5.
6.
Mazzotta
,
D. W.
,
Karaivanov
,
V. G.
,
Slaughter
,
W. S.
, and
Chyu
,
M. K.
, 2008, “
Gas-Side Heat Transfer in Syngas, Hydrogen-Fired and Oxyfuel Turbine
,” ASME Paper No. GT2008-GT51474.
8.
Mazzotta
,
D. W.
,
Chyu
,
M. K.
, and
Alvin
,
M. A.
, “
Airfoil Heat Transfer Characteristics in Syngas and Hydrogen Turbines
,” ASME Paper No. GT2007-28296.
9.
Thulin
,
R. D.
, and
Howe
,
D. C.
, 1982, “
Energy Efficient Engine High-Pressure Turbine Design Report
,”
NASA
Report Nos. CR-165608 and PWA-5594-171.
10.
Bunker
,
R. S.
, “
The Effects of Manufacturing Tolerances on Gas Turbine Cooling
,” ASME Paper No. GT2008-50124.
11.
Gleeson
,
B.
, 2006, “
Thermal Barrier Coatings and Aeroengine Applications
,”
J. Propul. Power
0748-4658,
22
(
2
), pp.
375
383
.