Abstract

Conventional power data prediction algorithms easily lead to the loss of key power data in a complex wireless network environment. Therefore, a power big data anomaly prediction algorithm based on parallel random forest is proposed. According to the power big data anomaly prediction algorithm based on parallel random forest, a network power big data anomaly prediction algorithm platform is established, and based on the platform, key data features such as user address and power transmission packet structure are extracted according to the category of power users. According to the relationship between power shunt function value and power data unit density, the parameter value of the system and finally the reasonable anomaly prediction of power big data in wireless network are determined. Finally, filter the classified data through attribute reduction and gene expression programming algorithm to obtain the data to be encrypted and complete the research on the anomaly prediction algorithm of power big data. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm has better prediction performance and can ensure better data prediction effect.

References

1.
M.
 
Liao
and
A.
 
Chakrabortty
, “
Optimization Algorithms for Catching Data Manipulators in Power System Estimation Loops
,”
IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology
27
, no. 
3
(May
2019
):
1203
1218
.
2.
A. J.
 
Samy Jeya Veronica
,
N.
 
Senthil Kumar
, and
F.
 
Gonzalez-Longatt
, “
Robust PI Controller Design for Frequency Stabilisation in a Hybrid Microgrid System Considering Parameter Uncertainties and Communication Time Delay
,”
IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution
13
, no. 
14
(July
2019
):
3048
3056
.
3.
Z. J.
 
Yang
,
P. P.
 
Han
, and
F. P.
 
Zhou
,
“Rapid Prediction of Electric Energy Consumption in Regional Buildings under Big Data Environment” (in Chinese)
,
Computer Simulation
36
, no. 
4
(
2019
):
432–435
.
4.
P.
 
Zhang
,
Y.
 
Xu
,
F.
 
Luo
, and
Z. Y.
 
Dong
, “
Power Big Data: New Assets of Electric Power Utilities
,”
Journal of Energy Engineering
145
, no. 
3
(June
2019
):
04019009
.
5.
A.
 
Onan
, “
A Fuzzy-Rough Nearest Neighbor Classifier Combined with Consistency-Based Subset Evaluation and Instance Selection for Automated Diagnosis of Breast Cancer
,”
Expert Systems with Applications
42
, no. 
20
(November
2015
):
6844
6852
.
6.
A.
 
Onan
and
S.
 
Korukoğlu
, “
A Feature Selection Model Based on Genetic Rank Aggregation for Text Sentiment Classification
,”
Journal of Information Science
43
, no. 
1
(February
2017
):
25
38
.
7.
A.
 
Onan
, “
Sentiment Analysis on Massive Open Online Course Evaluations: A Text Mining and Deep Learning Approach
,”
Computer Applications in Engineering Education
29
, no. 
3
(May
2021
):
572
589
.
8.
J.
 
Gea-Bermúdez
,
L.-L.
 
Pade
,
M. J.
 
Koivisto
, and
H.
 
Ravn
, “
Optimal Generation and Transmission Development of the North Sea Region: Impact of Grid Architecture and Planning Horizon
,”
Energy
191
(January
2020
):
116512
.
9.
J. F.
 
Torres
,
A.
 
Troncoso
,
I.
 
Koprinska
,
Z.
 
Wang
, and
F.
 
Martínez-Álvarez
, “
Big Data Solar Power Forecasting Based on Deep Learning and Multiple Data Sources
,”
Expert Systems: International Journal of Knowledge Engineering and Neural Networks
36
, no. 
4
(August
2019
):
e12394
.
10.
D. V.
 
Guzatov
,
S. V.
 
Gaponenko
, and
O. I.
 
Tevel
, “
Possible Enhancement of the Modulation Rate of Light-Emitting Diodes in Wireless Optical Data Transfer Networks by Means of Metal Nanoparticles with a Dielectric Shell
,”
Semiconductors
54
, no. 
13
(December
2020
):
1751
1756
.
11.
D.
 
Feng
,
S.
 
Lin
,
Z.
 
He
,
X.
 
Sun
, and
W.-J.
 
Lee
, “
Optimization Method with Prediction-Based Maintenance Strategy for Traction Power Supply Equipment Based on Risk Quantification
,”
IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification
4
, no. 
4
(December
2018
):
961
970
.
12.
B.
 
Xu
and
T.
 
Zhang
, “
GPU-Oriented Dynamic Low-Power Data Transmission Method
,”
The Journal of Supercomputing
77
, no. 
7
(July
2021
):
6525
6539
.
13.
D.
 
Yu
,
Y.
 
Hua
,
S.
 
Yu
,
P.
 
Zhang
,
H. H. C.
 
Iu
, and
T.
 
Fernando
, “
A New Modulation–Demodulation Approach to DC Power-Line Data Transmission for SRG-Integrated Microgrid
,”
IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
35
, no. 
11
(November
2020
):
12370
12382
.
14.
Y.
 
Qin
and
J.-G.
 
Zhu
, “
Deep Neural Network: Data Detection Channel for Hard Disk Drives by Learning
,”
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
56
, no. 
2
(February
2020
):
1
8
.
15.
B.
 
Sharma
,
X.
 
Gao
,
K.
 
Vijayan
,
X.
 
Tian
, and
H.
 
Li
, “
NHSS: A Speech and Singing Parallel Database
,”
Speech Communication
133
(October
2021
):
9
22
.
16.
B.
 
Ma
,
H.
 
Yuan
, and
Y.
 
Wu
, “
Exploring Performance of Clustering Methods on Document Sentiment Analysis
,”
Journal of Information Science
43
, no. 
1
(February
2017
):
54
74
.
17.
A.
 
Onan
, “
Sentiment Analysis on Product Reviews Based on Weighted Word Embeddings and Deep Neural Networks
,”
Concurrency and Computation
33
, no. 
23
(December
2021
):
e5909
.
18.
S. A.
 
Naghibi
,
H.
 
Hashemi
,
R.
 
Berndtsson
, and
S.
 
Lee
, “
Application of Extreme Gradient Boosting and Parallel Random Forest Algorithms for Assessing Groundwater Spring Potential Using DEM-Derived Factors
,”
Journal of Hydrology
589
(October
2020
):
125197
.
19.
H.
 
Mi
,
D.
 
Ebert
,
A.
 
Muruganujan
,
C.
 
Mills
,
L.-P.
 
Albou
,
T.
 
Mushayamaha
, and
P. D.
 
Thomas
, “
PANTHER Version 16: A Revised Family Classification, Tree-Based Classification Tool, Enhancer Regions and Extensive API
,”
Nucleic Acids Research
49
, no. 
D1
(January
2021
):
D394
D403
.
20.
U.
 
Gupta
and
D.
 
Gupta
, “
Least Squares Large Margin Distribution Machine for Regression
,”
Applied Intelligence
51
, no. 
10
(October
2021
):
7058
7093
.
You do not currently have access to this content.