Abstract

In additive manufacturing (AM) technologies, support structures are used to anchor a part to the base plate and to prevent the part from distortions and dimensional deviations due to high thermal gradients during manufacturing. Because the support structures do not contribute any value to the part and need to be removed after manufacturing with extra costs and time, different studies have focused on minimizing the use of such structures. However, it is almost impossible to totally eliminate the need for support structures, especially in very complex parts with different overhang surfaces. Therefore, it is very important to optimize the support structure geometry to reduce support volume and consequently costs and time. Thus, the aim of this study is to investigate the effect of tooth support geometrical parameters, namely tooth height, top length, base length, and base interval on the part’s dimensional accuracy, surface roughness, microhardness through thickness, and support volume used in overhangs produced by laser powder bed fusion AM technology from Inconel 718 material. The L9 Taguchi design method was used to reduce the number of experiments. The efficiency of the parameters was determined by analysis of variance. Analyses of signal-to-noise ratios were used to obtain the optimum support parameter combination. The study reveals that tooth height has the highest effect on support volume and dimensional accuracy. Tooth base length was found to be the most effective parameter on surface roughness and microhardness through thickness.

References

1.
Leary
M.
, “
Powder Bed Fusion
,” in
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Technologies, Design for Additive Manufacturing
(
Amsterdam, the Netherlands
:
Elsevier
,
2020
),
295
319
, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816721-2.00011-7
2.
Flores
I.
,
Kretzschmar
N.
,
Azman
A. H.
,
Chekurov
S.
,
Pedersen
D. B.
, and
Chaudhuri
A.
, “
Implications of Lattice Structures on Economics and Productivity of Metal Powder Bed Fusion
,”
Additive Manufacturing
31
(January
2020
): 100947, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100947
3.
Jiang
J.
,
Xu
X.
, and
Stringer
J.
, “
Support Structures for Additive Manufacturing: A Review
,”
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
2
, no. 
4
(September
2018
): 64, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp2040064
4.
Järvinen
J.-P.
,
Matilainen
V.
,
Li
X.
,
Piili
H.
,
Salminen
A.
,
Mäkelä
I.
, and
Nyrhilä
O.
, “
Characterization of Effect of Support Structures in Laser Additive Manufacturing of Stainless Steel
,”
Physics Procedia
56
(September
2014
):
72
81
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.099
5.
Cao
Q.
,
Bai
Y.
,
Zhang
J.
,
Shi
Z.
,
Fuh
J. Y. H.
, and
Wang
H.
, “
Removability of 316L Stainless Steel Cone and Block Support Structures Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting (SLM)
,”
Materials and Design
191
(June
2020
): 108691, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108691
6.
Kuo
Y.-H.
and
Cheng
C.-C.
, “
Self-Supporting Structure Design for Additive Manufacturing by Using a Logistic Aggregate Function
,”
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
60
(September
2019
):
1109
1121
, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02261-3
7.
Leary
M.
,
Maconachie
T.
,
Sarker
A.
,
Faruque
O.
, and
Brandt
M.
, “
Mechanical and Thermal Characterisation of AlSi10Mg SLM Block Support Structures
,”
Materials & Design
183
(December
2019
): 108138, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108138
8.
Strano
G.
,
Hao
L.
,
Everson
R. M.
, and
Evans
K. E.
, “
A New Approach to the Design and Optimization of Support Structures in Additive Manufacturing
,”
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
66
(June
2013
):
1247
1254
, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4403-x
9.
Das
P.
,
Chandran
R.
,
Samant
R.
, and
Anand
S.
, “
Optimum Part Build Orientation in Additive Manufacturing for Minimizing Part Errors and Support Structures
,”
Procedia Manufacturing
1
(October
2015
):
343
354
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.09.041
10.
Hussein
A.
,
Hao
L.
,
Yan
C.
,
Everson
R.
, and
Young
P.
, “
Advanced Lattice Support Structures for Metal Additive Manufacturing
,”
Journal of Materials Processing Technology
213
, no. 
7
(July
2013
):
1019
1026
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.01.020
11.
Umer
U.
,
Ameen
W.
,
Abidi
M. H.
,
Moiduddin
K.
,
Alkhalefah
H.
,
Alkahtani
M.
, and
Al-Ahmari
A.
, “
Modeling the Effect of Different Support Structures in Electron Beam Melting of Titanium Alloy Using Finite Element Models
,”
Metals
9
, no. 
7
(July
2019
): 806, https://doi.org/10.3390/met9070806
12.
Zeng
K.
, “
Optimization of Support Structures for Selective Laser Melting
” (PhD diss.,
University of Louisville
,
2015
), https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/2221
13.
Gan
M. X.
and
Wong
C. H.
, “
Practical Support Structures for Selective Laser Melting
,”
Journal of Materials Processing Technology
238
(December
2016
):
474
484
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.08.006
14.
Poyraz
Ö.
,
Yasa
E.
,
Akbulut
G.
,
Orhangül
A.
, and
Pilatin
S.
, “
Investigation of Support Structures for Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS) of IN625 Parts
” (paper presentation, 26th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX, August 10–12,
2015
).
15.
Calignano
F.
, “
Design Optimization of Supports for Overhanging Structures in Aluminum and Titanium Alloys by Selective Laser Melting
,”
Materials & Design
64
(December
2014
):
203
213
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.043
16.
Lindecke
P. N. J.
,
Blunk
H.
,
Wenzl
J.-P.
,
Möller
M.
, and
Emmelmann
C.
, “
Optimization of Support Structures for the Laser Additive Manufacturing of TiAl6V4 Parts
,”
Procedia CIRP
74
(September
2018
):
53
58
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.029
17.
Ameen
W.
,
Mohammed
M. K.
, and
Al-Ahmari
A.
, “
Evaluation of Support Structure Removability for Additively Manufactured Ti6Al4V Overhangs via Electron Beam Melting
,”
Metals
9
, no. 
11
(November
2019
): 1211, https://doi.org/10.3390/met9111211
18.
Ameen
W.
,
Al-Ahmari
A.
,
Mohammed
M. K.
, and
Kaid
H.
, “
Multi-objective Optimization of Support Structures for Metal Additive Manufacturing
,”
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
116
, no. 
7
(October
2021
):
2613
2632
, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07555-9
19.
Ameen
W.
,
Al-Ahmari
A.
, and
Mohammed
M. K.
, “
Self-Supporting Overhang Structures Produced by Additive Manufacturing through Electron Beam Melting
,”
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
104
, no. 
5
(June
2019
):
2215
2232
, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04007-3
20.
Ameen
W.
,
Mohammed
M. K.
,
Al-Ahmari
A.
,
Ahmed
N.
, and
Mian
S. H.
, “
Investigation of Support Structure Parameters and Their Affects during Additive Manufacturing of Ti6Al4V Alloy via Electron Beam Melting
,”
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications
. Published ahead of print, December 22,
2020
, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420720981668
21.
Newton
L.
,
Senin
N.
,
Gomez
C.
,
Danzl
R.
,
Helmli
F.
,
Blunt
L.
, and
Leach
R.
, “
Areal Topography Measurement of Metal Additive Surfaces Using Focus Variation Microscopy
,”
Additive Manufacturing
25
(January
2019
):
365
389
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.013
22.
Xiao
Z.
,
Yang
Y.
,
Xiao
R.
,
Bai
Y.
,
Song
C.
, and
Wang
D.
, “
Evaluation of Topology Optimized Lattice Structures Manufactured via Selective Laser Melting
,”
Materials & Design
143
(April
2018
):
27
37
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.023
23.
Li
R.
,
Liu
J.
,
Shi
Y.
,
Wang
L.
, and
Jiang
W.
, “
Balling Behavior of Stainless Steel and Nickel Powder during Selective Laser Melting Process
,”
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
59
, no. 
9
(April
2012
):
1025
1035
, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3566-1
24.
Boutaous
M.
,
Liu
X.
,
Siginer
D. A.
, and
Xin
S.
, “
Balling Phenomenon in Metallic Laser Based 3D Printing Process
,”
International Journal of Thermal Sciences
167
(September
2021
): 107011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2021.107011
25.
Dwivedi
S.
,
Dixit
A. R.
, and
Das
A. K.
, “
Wetting Behavior of Selective Laser Melted (SLM) Bio-medical Grade Stainless Steel 316L
,”
Materials Today: Proceedings
56
, Part 1 (April
2022
):
46
50
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.12.046
26.
Ren
D.
,
Li
S.
,
Wang
H.
,
Hou
W.
,
Hao
Y.
,
Jin
W.
,
Yang
R.
,
Devesh
R.
,
Misra
K.
, and
Murr
L. E.
, “
Fatigue Behavior of Ti-6Al-4V Cellular Structures Fabricated by Additive Manufacturing Technique
,”
Journal of Materials Science & Technology
35
, no. 
2
(February
2019
):
285
294
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2018.09.066
27.
Karabulut
Y.
,
Tascioglu
E.
, and
Kaynak
Y.
, “
Heat Treatment Temperature-Induced Microstructure, Microhardness and Wear Resistance of Inconel 718 Produced by Selective Laser Melting Additive Manufacturing
,”
Optik
227
(February
2021
): 163907, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.163907
28.
Qi
M.
,
Huang
S.
,
Ma
Y.
,
Youssef
S. S.
,
Zhang
R.
,
Qiu
J.
,
Lei
J.
, and
Yang
R.
, “
Columnar to Equiaxed Transition during β Heat Treatment in a Near β Alloy by Laser Additive Manufacture
,”
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
13
(July–August
2021
):
1159
1168
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.05.057
29.
Kouraytem
N.
,
Chanut
R. A.
,
Watring
D. S.
,
Loveless
T.
,
Varga
J.
,
Spear
A. D.
, and
Kingstedt
O. T.
, “
Dynamic-Loading Behavior and Anisotropic Deformation of Pre- and Post-heat-treated IN718 Fabricated by Laser Powder Bed Fusion
,”
Additive Manufacturing
33
(May
2020
): 101083, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101083
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.