Abstract

Commercial rooftops provide extensive areas that represent the ideal platform to install a photovoltaic (PV) system. The combination of the roofing assembly and the PV system is termed a photovoltaic roofing assembly (PVRA). There was little guidance for determining the wind loads on rooftop PV systems for many years. With the efforts of the Structural Engineers Association of California and numerous wind tunnel studies conducted by reputed labs, the design methodology for determining wind loads on PV systems has been established, which has become ASCE 7-16, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, and the National Building Code of Canada 2015. However, there is no guidance on the resistance aspect of the PVRA. During the life cycle of the rooftop solar array, the variable amplitude of the dynamic wind loading can lead to fatigue, which can accumulate damage in structure details. Such damages might lead to severe failures in the whole PVRA. Currently, there are no standardized test methods that determine the collective performance of a PVRA. In collaboration with the roofing and solar industry, the National Research Council Canada (NRC) is conducting a research study to address the missing link between the design and resistance of a PVRA. A unique, dynamic test method was developed to determine the wind pressure resistance of a PVRA. The test methodology applies uniform wind pressure on a 3 × 3 array. It provides a complete load path evaluating the capacity in members, connections, and PV attachments to the roof assembly. The current paper presents the PVRA test apparatus commissioning process. It details the experimental apparatus, the definition of the testing specimen, the establishment of a dynamic loading protocol, and quantification (measurements) of the system response. It also presents the results of pilot testing conducted as per the new test method. Once standardized, this new protocol will ensure that PVRA integrity is maintained and PV performance is optimized.

References

1.
International Energy Agency (IEA)
Technology Roadmap Solar Photovoltaic Energy, 2014 Edition
(
Paris
:
International Energy Agency
,
2014
).
2.
Standard Terminology of Solar Energy Conversion
, ASTM E772-15 (2021) (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved November 19,
2021
), https://doi.org/10.1520/E0772-15R21
3.
Maffei
J.
,
Telleen
K.
,
Ward
R.
, and
Kopp
G. A.
, “
Wind Design Practice and Recommendations for Solar Arrays on Low-Slope Roofs
,”
Journal of Structural Engineering
140
, no. 
2
(February
2014
): 04013040, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000806
4.
Radu
A.
,
Axinte
E.
, and
Theohari
C.
, “
Steady Wind Pressures on Solar Collectors on Flat-Roofed Building
,”
Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics
23
(January
1986
):
249
258
, https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(86)90046-2
5.
Wood
G. S.
,
Denoon
R. O.
, and
Kwok
K. C. S.
, “
Wind Loads on Industrial Solar Panel Arrays and Supporting Roof Structures
,”
Wind and Structures
4
, no. 
6
(December
2001
):
481
494
, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2001.4.6.481
6.
Kopp
G. A.
,
Farquhar
S.
, and
Morrison
M. J.
, “
Aerodynamics Mechanisms for Wind Loads on Tilted, Roof-Mounted Solar Arrays
,”
Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics
111
(December
2012
):
40
52
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.08.004
7.
Cao
J.
,
Yoshida
A.
,
Saha
P. K.
, and
Tamura
Y.
, “
Wind Loading Characteristics of Solar Arrays Mounted on Flat Roofs
,”
Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics
123
, Part A (December
2013
):
214
225
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.08.014
8.
Banks
D.
, “
The Role of Corner Vortices in Dictating Peak Wind Loads on Tilted Flat Solar Panels Mounted on Large, Flat Roofs
,”
Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics
123
, Part A (December
2013
):
192
201
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.08.015
9.
Browne
M. T. L.
,
Gibbons
M. P. M.
,
Gamble
S.
, and
Galsworth
J.
, “
Wind Loading on Tilted Roof-Top Solar Arrays: The Parapet Effect
,”
Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics
123
, Part A (December
2013
):
202
213
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.08.013
10.
Kopp
G. A.
, “
Wind Loads on Low-Profile, Tilted, Solar Arrays Placed on Large, Flat, Low-Rise Building Roofs
,”
Journal of Structural Engineering
140
, no. 
2
(February
2014
), https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000825
11.
Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC) Wind Subcommittee on Solar Photovoltaic Systems,
Wind Design for Low-Profile Solar Photovoltaic Arrays on Flat Roofs, SEAOC Report PV
(
Sacramento, CA
:
SEAOC
,
2012
).
12.
Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures
, ASCE/SEI 7-16 (
Reston, VA
:
American Society of Civil Engineers
,
2016
).
13.
Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures
, ASCE/SEI 7-10 (
Reston, VA
:
American Society of Civil Engineers
,
2010
).
14.
Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes
National Building Code of Canada (NBCC) 2015
,
1
(
Ottawa, Canada
:
National Research Council of Canada
,
2015
).
15.
Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes
Structural Commentaries (User’s Guide – NBC 2015: Part 4 of Division B)
(
Ottawa, Canada
:
National Research Council of Canada
,
2015
).
16.
National Roofing Contractors Association
NRCA Guidelines for Roof-Mounted Photovoltaic System Installations
, 2nd ed. (
Rosemont, IL
:
National Roofing Contractors Association
,
2018
).
17.
Solar Photovoltaic Rooftop-Installation Best Practices Guideline
, SPE-900-13 (
Toronto, Canada
:
Canadian Standards Association [CSA Group]
,
2013
).
18.
Mounting Systems
Mounting Devices, Clamping/Retention Devices, and Ground Lugs for Use with Flat-Plate Photovoltaic Modules and Panels
, UL 2703 (
Northbrook, IL
:
Underwriters Laboratories, Inc.
,
2015
).
20.
Baskaran
A.
and
Lei
W.
, “
A New Facility for Dynamic Wind Performance Evaluation of Roofing Systems
” in
Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Roofing Technology
(
Gaithersburg, MD
:
National Institute of Standards and Technology
,
1997
),
168
178
.
21.
Standard Test Method for the Dynamic Wind Uplift Resistance of Membrane-Roofing Systems
, A123.21-20 (
Toronto, Canada
:
Canadian Standards Association [CSA Group]
,
2020
).
22.
Baskaran
B. A.
,
Chen
Y.
, and
Vilaipornsawai
U.
, “
A New Dynamic Wind Load Cycle to Evaluate Flexible Membrane Roofs
,”
Journal of Testing and Evaluation
27
, no. 
4
(July
1999
):
249
265
, https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE12223J
23.
SEAOC Solar Photovoltaic Systems Committee
Structural Seismic Requirements and Commentary for Rooftop Solar Photovoltaic Arrays, SEAOC Report PV1-2012
(
Sacramento, CA
:
Structural Engineers Association of California [SEAOC]
,
2012
).
24.
American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI)
A Design Guide for Standing Seam Roof Panels, CF00-1
(
Washington, DC
:
American Iron and Steel Institute
,
2000
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.