Abstract

Geopolymer has obtained significant importance as an alternative eco-friendly binder material for ordinary portland cement (OPC) as it can be produced from the reaction between the industrial by-product materials rich in alumina, silica, and alkaline solutions. Therefore, usage of geopolymer effectively in the construction industry will help to reduce the consumption of a huge quantity of natural resources for the energy processes required for the production of OPC. It is also one of important solution to control carbon dioxides emission by the usage of OPC. On the other hand, using construction and demolition waste (C&DW) as the source of recycled aggregates in construction industry helps to reduce the huge consumption of natural aggregates and protect the environment from the disturbances caused by the unorganized dumping of C&DW. In this study, an attempt has been made to produce fly ash (FA)-based geopolymer mortar mixes using C&DW effectively as fine aggregates partially. The effects of recycled fine aggregates (RFA), the ratio of alkaline liquid (AL) to FA, and duration of heat curing on the properties of the produced geopolymer mortar mixes have been discussed in this article. To determine the influence of RFA on the strength and volume change behavior of mixes, natural fine aggregates were replaced by RFA at 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 % by mass. The AL/FA ratio was adopted as 0.4 and 0.6. Higher compressive strength was observed for most of the mortar mixes having RFA up to 20 %, and higher drying shrinkage value was found for the mixes with higher RFA content. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were also studied for knowledge about the signature of the formed structures in the mortar mixes, which were observed having higher strength.

References

1.
Davidovits
J.
, “
30 Years of Successes and Failures in Geopolymer Applications. Market Trends and Potential Breakthroughs
” (paper presentation, Geopolymer 2002 Conference, Melbourne, Australia, October 28–29,
2002
).
2.
Davidovits
J.
, “
Geopolymers: Inorganic Polymeric New Materials
,”
Journal of Thermal Analysis
37
(
1991
):
1633
1656
, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01912193
3.
Saha
S.
,
Rajasekaran
C.
, and
Vidhya
S.
, “
Geopolymer Concrete- An Eco-Friendly Concrete: A Review of Recent Scenario
” (paper presentation, Second International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Built Environment, Vellore, India, March 10–12,
2016
).
4.
Guo
X.
,
Shi
H.
, and
Dick
W. A.
, “
Compressive Strength and Microstructural Characteristics of Class C Fly Ash Geopolymer
,”
Cement and Concrete Composites
32
, no. 
2
(February
2010
):
142
147
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.11.003
5.
Somna
K.
,
Jaturapitakkul
C.
,
Kajitvichyanukul
P.
, and
Chindaprasirt
P.
, “
NaOH-Activated Ground Fly Ash Geopolymer Cured at Ambient Temperature
,”
Fuel
90
, no. 
6
(June
2011
):
2118
2124
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.01.018
6.
Aydin
S.
and
Baradan
B.
, “
Mechanical and Micro-Structural Properties of Heat Cured Alkali-Activated Slag Mortars
,”
Materials & Design
35
(March
2012
):
374
383
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.10.005
7.
Adam
A. A.
and
Horianto
X. X. X.
, “
The Effect of Temperature and Duration of Curing on the Strength of Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Mortar
,”
Procedia Engineering
95
(
2014
):
410
414
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.199
8.
Görhan
G.
and
Kürklü
G.
, “
The Influence of the NaOH Solution on the Properties of the Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Mortar Cured at Different Temperatures
,”
Composites: Part B: Engineering
58
(March
2014
):
371
377
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.082
9.
Sagoe-Crentsil
K.
,
Brown
T.
, and
Taylor
A.
, “
Drying Shrinkage and Creep Performance of Geopolymer Concrete
,”
Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials
2
, no. 
1
(
2013
):
35
42
, https://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2013.764963
10.
Rao
G. A.
, “
Long-Term Drying Shrinkage of Mortar - Influence of Silica Fume and Size of Fine Aggregate
,”
Cement and Concrete Research
31
, no. 
2
(February
2001
):
171
175
, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00347-1
11.
Aitcin
P.-C.
,
Neville
A. M.
, and
Acker
P.
, “
Integrated View of Shrinkage Deformation
,”
Concrete International
19
, no. 
9
(September
1997
):
35
41
.
12.
Almudaiheem
J. A.
and
Hansen
W.
, “
Effect of Specimen Size and Shape on Drying Shrinkage of Concrete
,”
Materials Journal
84
, no. 
2
(March
1987
):
130
135
.
13.
Shariq
M.
,
Prasad
J.
, and
Abbas
H.
, “
Creep and Drying Shrinkage of Concrete Containing GGBFS
,”
Cement and Concrete Composites
68
(April
2016
):
35
45
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.02.004
14.
Saha
S.
and
Rajasekaran
C.
, “
Mechanical Properties of Recycled Aggregate Concrete Produced with Portland Pozzolana Cement
,”
Advances in Concrete Construction
4
, no. 
1
(
2016
):
27
35
, https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2016.4.1.027
15.
Saha
S.
,
Rajasekaran
C.
, and
Pai
T. V.
, “
Use Of Recycled Coarse Aggregates as an Alternative in Construction Industry – A Review
” (paper presentation, Fourth International Engineering Symposium, Kumamoto, Japan, March 4–6,
2016
).
16.
Saha
S.
and
Rajasekaran
C.
, “
Strength Characteristics of Recycled Aggregate Concrete Produced with Portland Slag Cement
,”
Journal of Construction Engineering, Technology & Management
6
, no. 
1
(
2016
):
70
77
.
17.
Apoorva
S.
,
Saha
S.
, and
Rajasekaran
C.
, “
Experimental Study on Water Absorption and Accelerated Curing Properties of Recycled Aggregates in Concrete
” (paper presentation, Fifth International Engineering Symposium, Kumamoto, Japan, March 3–5,
2016
).
18.
Sérifou
M.
,
Sbartaï
Z. M.
,
Yotte
S.
,
Boffoué
M. O.
,
Emeruwa
E.
, and
Bos
F.
, “
A Study of Concrete Made with Fine and Coarse Aggregates Recycled from Fresh Concrete Waste
,”
Journal of Construction Engineering
2013
(
2013
): 5, https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/317182
19.
Neno
C.
,
de Brito
J.
, and
Veiga
R.
, “
Using Fine Recycled Concrete Aggregate for Mortar Production
,”
Materials Research
17
, no. 
1
(January/February
2014
):
168
177
, https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392013005000164
20.
Evangelista
L.
and
de Brito
J.
, “
Mechanical Behaviour of Concrete Made with Fine Recycled Concrete Aggregates
,”
Cement and Concrete Composites
29
, no. 
5
(May
2007
):
397
401
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.12.004
21.
Monish
M.
,
Srivastava
V.
,
Agarwal
V. C.
, and
Kumar
R.
, “
Utilization of Demolished Waste as Fine Aggregate in Concrete
,”
Journal of Academia and Industrial Research
1
, no. 
7
(December
2012
):
398
400
.
22.
Kou
S.-C.
and
Poon
C.-S.
, “
Properties of Concrete Prepared with Crushed Fine Stone, Furnace Bottom Ash and Fine Recycled Aggregate as Fine Aggregates
,”
Construction and Building Materials
23
, no. 
8
(August
2009
):
2877
2886
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.009
23.
Khatib
J. M.
, “
Properties of Concrete Incorporating Fine Recycled Aggregate
,”
Cement and Concrete Research
35
, no. 
4
(April
2005
):
763
769
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.017
24.
Evangelista
L.
and
de Brito
J.
, “
Durability Performance of Concrete Made with Fine Recycled Concrete Aggregates
,”
Cement and Concrete Composites
32
, no. 
1
(January
2010
):
9
14
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.09.005
25.
Sata
V.
,
Wongsa
A.
, and
Chindaprasirt
P.
, “
Properties of Pervious Geopolymer Concrete Using Recycled Aggregates
,”
Construction and Building Materials
42
(May
2013
):
33
39
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.12.046
26.
Nuaklong
P.
,
Sata
V.
, and
Chindaprasirt
P.
, “
Influence of Recycled Aggregate on Fly Ash Geopolymer Concrete Properties
,”
Journal of Cleaner Production
112
(January
2016
):
2300
2307
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.109
27.
Saha
S.
and
Rajasekaran
C.
, “
Enhancement of the Properties of Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Paste by Incorporating Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag
,”
Construction and Building Materials
146
(August
2017
):
615
620
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.139
28.
Specifications for Coarse and Fine Aggregates from Natural Sources of Concrete
, IS: 383-1970 (
New Delhi
:
Bureau of Indian Standards
,
1971
).
29.
Methods of Physical Tests for Hydraulic Cement, Part 10: Determination of Drying Shrinkage
, IS: 4031 (Part 10) - 1988 (
New Delhi
:
Bureau of Indian Standards
,
1988
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.