Abstract

The bearing sector has a demand for high precision and expensive machine tools. To ensure product quality and reduction of operating costs, the manufacturers in this sector should develop an appropriate supplier evaluation mechanism for the bearings. Therefore, this study presents a Hesitant Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (HF-AHP) technique for the evaluation of suppliers. HF-AHP, which is an extension of the well-known Fuzzy AHP (F-AHP), allows more space to decision makers while they are performing pairwise comparisons in hesitant situations. This article also introduces a consistency analysis technique for the preferences. This technique firstly sorts out the hesitancy and then deals with fuzzy comparisons. In addition, to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed approach, a case study is presented as a numerical example in the bearing industry. The results of this application are compared with the results of the same case that was previously handled with the traditional F-AHP method in the literature. Finally, sensitivity analysis, which is performed to check the robustness of the decision, investigates the effects of changes in criteria weights.

References

1.
Ayhan
M. B.
, “
Fuzzy TOPSIS Application for Supplier Selection Problem
,”
International Journal of Information, Business and Management
5
, no. 
2
(
2013
):
159
174
.
2.
Chang
K.
,
Chain
K.
,
Wen
T.
, and
Yang
G. K.
, “
A Novel General Approach for Solving a Supplier Selection Problem
,”
Journal of Testing and Evaluation
44
, no. 
5
(September
2016
):
1911
1924
. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20150038
3.
de Boer
L.
,
Labro
E.
, and
Morlacchi
P.
, “
A Review of Methods Supporting Supplier Selection
,”
European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management
7
, no. 
2
(June
2001
):
75
89
. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00028-9
4.
Saaty
T. L.
,
The Analytic Hierarchy Process
(
New York
:
McGraw-Hill
,
1980
).
5.
Zadeh
L.
, “
Fuzzy Sets
,”
Information and Control
8
, no. 
3
(June
1965
):
338
353
. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
6.
Rodriguez
R. M.
,
Martinez
L.
, and
Herrera
F.
, “
Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets for Decision Making
,”
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
20
, no. 
1
(February
2012
):
109
119
. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2011.2170076
7.
Atanassov
K. T.
, “
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets
,”
Fuzzy Sets and Systems
20
, no. 
1
(August
1986
):
87
96
. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
8.
Rouyendegh
B.
, “
Developing an Integrated ANP and Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS Model for Supplier Selection
,”
Journal of Testing and Evaluation
43
, no. 
3
(May
2015
):
664
672
. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20130114
9.
Yager
R. R.
, “
On the Theory of Bags
,”
International Journal of General Systems
13
, no. 
1
(
1986
):
23
37
. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081078608934952
10.
Garibaldi
J. M.
,
Jaroszewski
M.
, and
Musikasuwan
S.
, “
Nonstationary Fuzzy Sets
,”
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
16
, no. 
4
(August
2008
):
1072
1086
. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2008.917308
11.
Torra
V.
, “
Hesitant Fuzzy Sets
,”
International Journal of Intelligent Systems
25
, no. 
6
(March
2010
):
529
539
. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.20418
12.
Yavuz
M.
,
Oztaysi
B.
,
Onar
S. Cevik
, and
Kahraman
C.
, “
Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Alternative-Fuel Vehicles via a Hierarchical Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Model
,”
Expert Systems with Applications
42
, no. 
5
(April
2015
):
2835
2848
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.010
13.
Tong
X.
and
Yu
L.
, “
MADM Based on Distance and Correlation Coefficient Measures with Decision-Maker Preferences under a Hesitant Fuzzy Environment
,”
Soft Computing
20
, no. 
11
(November
2016
):
4449
4461
. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-015-1754-x
14.
Liao
H.
,
Xu
Z.
, and
Zeng
X.-J.
, “
Distance and Similarity Measures for Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets and Their Application in Multi-Criteria Decision Making
,”
Information Sciences
271
(July
2014
):
125
142
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.02.12
15.
Tai
Y. T.
,
Pearn
W. L.
, and
You
S. K.
, “
An Effective Test for Supplier Selection Evaluation with Multiple Characteristics
,”
Journal of Testing and Evaluation
39
, no. 
6
(November
2011
):
1165
1173
. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE103937
16.
Liu
H.
and
Rodriguez
R. M.
, “
A Fuzzy Envelope for Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Set and Its Application to Multi-Criteria Decision Making
,”
Information Sciences
258
(February
2014
):
220
238
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2013.07.027
17.
Rodríguez
R. M.
,
Martínez
L.
, and
Herrera
F.
, “
A Group Decision Making Model Dealing with Comparative Linguistic Expressions Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets
,”
Information Sciences
241
(August
2013
):
28
42
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2013.04.006
18.
Saaty
T. L.
,
Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process
(
Pittsburgh, PA
:
RWS Publications
,
1994
).
19.
Ilbahar
E.
,
Karaşan
A.
,
Cebi
S.
, and
Kahraman
C.
, “
A Novel Approach to Risk Assessment for Occupational Health and Safety Using Pythagorean Fuzzy AHP & Fuzzy Inference System
,”
Safety Science
103
(March
2018
):
124
136
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.025
20.
Sirisawat
P.
and
Kiatcharoenpol
T.
, “
Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Approaches to Prioritizing Solutions for Reverse Logistics Barriers
,”
Computers & Industrial Engineering
117
(March
2018
):
303
318
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.01.015
21.
Ayhan
M. B.
, “
A Fuzzy AHP Approach for Supplier Selection Problem: A Case Study in a Gear Motor Company
,”
International Journal of Managing Value and Supply Chains
4
, no. 
3
(September
2013
):
11
23
. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijmvsc.2013.4302
22.
Zhang
X.
and
Xu
Z.
,
Hesitant Fuzzy Methods for Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis
(
Basel, Switzerland
:
Springer Nature
,
2017
). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42001-1
23.
Liao
H.
and
Xu
Z.
,
Hesitant Fuzzy Decision Making Methodologies and Applications
(
Basel, Switzerland
:
Springer Nature
,
2017
). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3265-3
24.
Dickson
G. W.
, “
An Analysis of Vendor Selection Systems and Decision
,”
Journal of Purchasing
2
, no. 
1
(February
1966
):
5
17
. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.1966.tb00818.x
25.
Mardani
A.
,
Jusoh
A.
, and
Zavadskas
E. K.
, “
Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Techniques and Applications – Two Decades Review from 1994 to 2014
,”
Expert Systems with Applications
42
, no. 
8
(May
2015
):
4126
4148
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.003
26.
Kahraman
C.
,
Onar
S. Cevik
, and
Oztaysi
B.
, “
Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making: A Literature Review
,”
International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems
8
, no. 
4
(August
2015
):
637
666
. https://doi.org/10.1080/18756891.2015.1046325
27.
Buyukozkan
G.
,
Feyzioğlu
O.
, and
Nebol
O.
, “
Selection of the Strategic Alliance Partner in Logistics Value Chain
,”
International Journal of Production Economics
113
, no. 
1
(May
2008
):
148
158
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.01.016
28.
Li
C.-C.
,
Rodríguez
R. M.
,
Martínez
L.
,
Dong
Y.
, and
Herrera
F.
, “
Consistency of Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations: An Interval Consistency Index
,”
Information Sciences
432
(March
2018
):
347
361
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.12.018
29.
Wang
H.
,
Zeshui
X.
, and
Zeng
X.-J.
, “
Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets for Linguistic Decision Making: Current Developments, Issues and Challenges
,”
Information Fusion
43
(September
2018
):
1
12
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2017.11.010
30.
Buckley
J. J.
, “
Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis
,”
Fuzzy Sets and Systems
17
, no. 
3
(December
1985
):
233
247
. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9
31.
Ayhan
M. B.
and
Kilic
H. S.
, “
A Two Stage Approach for Supplier Selection Problem in Multi-Item/Multi-Supplier Environment with Quantity Discounts
,”
Computers & Industrial Engineering
85
(July
2015
):
1
12
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.02.026
32.
Chou
S.-W.
and
Chang
Y.-C.
, “
The Implementation Factors that Influence the ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) Benefits
,”
Decision Support Systems
46
, no. 
1
(December
2008
):
149
157
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2008.06.003
33.
Basaran
B.
, “
A Critique on the Consistency Ratios of Some Selected Articles Regarding Fuzzy AHP and Sustainability
,” in
Third International Symposium on Sustainable Development
(
Ilidža, Bosnia and Herzegovina
:
International Burch University
,
2012
):
318
326
.
34.
Al-Harbi
K. M. A.-S.
, “
Application of the AHP in Project Management
,”
International Journal of Project Management
19
, no. 
1
(January
2001
):
19
27
. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00038-1
35.
Kwong
C. K.
and
Bai
H.
, “
Determining the Importance Weights for the Customer Requirements in QFD Using a Fuzzy AHP with an Extent Analysis Approach
,”
IIE Transactions
35
, no. 
7
(
2010
):
619
626
. https://doi.org/10.1080/07408170304355
36.
Ross
T. J.
,
Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications, 2nd ed
. (
Hoboken, NJ
:
John Wiley and Sons
,
2004
).
37.
Hellendorn
H.
and
Thomas
C.
, “
Defuzzification in Fuzzy Controllers
,”
Journal of Intelligent Fuzzy Systems
1
, no. 
2
(
1993
):
109
123
. https://doi.org/10.3233/IFS-1993-1202
38.
Husain
S.
,
Ahmad
Y.
,
Sharma
M.
, and
Ali
S.
, “
Comparative Analysis of Defuzzification Approaches from an Aspect of Real Life Problem
,”
IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering
19
, no. 
6
(December
2017
):
19
25
.
39.
Bana e Costa
C. A.
and
Vansnick
J.-C.
, “
A Critical Analysis of the Eigenvalue Method Used to Derive Priorities in AHP
,”
European Journal of Operational Research
187
, no. 
3
(June
2008
):
1422
1428
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.022
40.
Lane
E. F.
and
Verdini
W. A.
, “
A Consistency Test for AHP Decision Makers
,”
Decision Sciences
20
, no. 
3
(September
1989
):
575
590
. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1989.tb01568.x
41.
Lin
M.-C.
,
Wang
C.-C.
,
Chen
M.-S.
, and
Chang
C. A.
, “
Using AHP and TOPSIS Approaches in Customer-Driven Product Design Process
,”
Computers in Industry
59
, no. 
1
(January
2008
):
17
31
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2007.05.013
42.
Saaty
T. L.
, “
Decision-Making with the AHP: Why is the Principal Eigenvector Necessary
,”
European Journal of Operational Research
145
, no. 
1
(February
2003
):
85
91
. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00227-8
43.
Saaty
T. L.
and
Tran
L. T.
, “
On the Invalidity of Fuzzifying Numerical Judgments in the AHP
,”
Mathematical and Computer Modelling
46
, nos. 
7–8
(October
2007
):
962
975
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.022
44.
Brunelli
M.
,
Introduction to the Analytic Hierarchy Process
(
New York
:
Springer International Publishing
,
2015
).
45.
Kahraman
C.
,
Kaya
İ.
, and
Cebi
S.
, “
A Comparative Analysis for Multiattribute Selection among Renewable Energy Alternatives Using Fuzzy Axiomatic Design and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process
,”
Energy
34
, no. 
10
(October
2009
):
1603
1616
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2009.07.008
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.