Abstract

Podometrics is an original and innovative system to establish cartographical and geometrical parameters for the human foot: a methodology for “mapping” the foot to determine foot types by anthropometrical classification. A methodology has long been evasive because of the challenging complexities of the foot with its unique shapes, components and many converging contours and angles. Foot typing efforts to date have not been particularly productive or effective because the emphasis has been mostly on external features rather than on both internal and external features; and also because the main focus has been on numerical measurement data rather than geometrical design. Further, foot typing has often included both structural and functional features, which sometimes tend to be conflicting and confusing by intermixing structural and functional types.

Podometrics has numerous potential practical applications in various fields. For example, in orthopaedics and podiatry in establishing foot norms in the diagnosis and therapies of foot disorders; in the shoe industry for the design of shoe lasts and footwear, and enabling the development of a uniform system of shoe sizes for better shoe fit and more efficient biomechanics within the shoe; in physical anthropology for developing an anthropometric system for genetic or racial foot typing; in criminology for detection of body type via foot type obtained from footprints.

References

1.
Applications of the Proportional Grade to Footwear Manufacturing
,
American Footwear Industries Assn.
,
Arlington, Va.
,
1965
.
2.
Foot Measurements in Soldiers
,
Armored Medical Research Laboratory
,
Fort Knox, Ky.
,
03
1946
.
3.
Bailey
,
M.
,
Sizing of Navy Fleet Shoes
,
U.S. Navy Supply Research and Development Facility
,
Bayonne, N.J.
,
1966
.
4.
Heath
,
A.
,
Some Basic Considerations in Shoe Last Sizing Systems
,
Leather & Shoes
,
12
08
1967
.
5.
Mann
,
C. W.
and
Zacharias
,
W. B.
, “
Applications of Foot Measurement in the Development of Last Systems
,” Report No. 7,
Dept. of the Army Office of the QM General
, Washington, D.C.,
1952
.
6.
Randall
,
F. E.
,
Munro
,
E. H.
, and
White
,
R.
, “
Anthropometry of the Feet
,” Report No. 172,
QM Research and Development Div.
,
1951
.
7.
Rossi
,
W. A.
, “
The Futile Search for Perfect Shoe Fit
,”
Journal of Testing and Evaluation
 0090-3973, Vol.
16
,
07
1988
.
8.
Rossi
,
W. A.
, “
The High Incidence of Mismated Feet in the Population
,”
Foot & Ankle
, Sept. – Oct. 1983.
9.
Rossi
,
W. A.
,
Professional Shoe Fitting
,
National Shoe Retailers Assn.
,
New York
,
1984
.
10.
Sheldon
,
W. H.
and
McDermott
,
E.
,
Atlas of Men: A Guide for Somatoryping
,
Harper
,
New York
,
1954
.
11.
Sheldon
,
W. H.
and
Tucker
,
W. B.
, “
Body Build Variations in 4.000 College Men and 2,500 College Women
,”
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
 0002-9483, Vol.
23
,
1938
.
12.
Sheldon
,
W. H.
,
Stevens
,
G. S.
, and
Tucker
,
W. B.
The Varteues of Human Physique
,
Harper
,
New York
,
1940
.
13.
A New Shoe Sizing System
,”
Boot and Shoe Recorder
,
15
10
1964
.
14.
British School Population Dimensional Survey
,”
Great Britain Dept of Education and Science, H.M. Stationary Office
,
London
,
1971
.
15.
Bunch
,
R. P.
, “
Foot Measurement Strategies for Fitting Athletes
,”
Journal of Testing and Evaluation
 0090-3973, Vol.
16
,
06
1988
.
16.
Children's Body Measurements for Sizing Garments and Patterns
,”
U.S. Bureau of Home Economics
,
09
1939
.
17.
Donatelli
,
R. A.
, “
The Biomechanics of the Foot and Ankle
,”
F. A. Davis
,
Philadelphia
,
1990
.
18.
Ethnic Variables in Human Factors Engineering
,
Symposium Oosterbeek
,
The Netherlands
,
06
1972
,
Johns Hopkins University Press
,
Baltimore
,
1975
.
19.
Gooderson
,
C. Y.
and
Beebee
,
M.
, “
Anthropometry of Infantrymen: 1973–1974
,”
Army Personnel Research Establishment
,
Farnborough, Hampshire
,
England
,
1976
.
20.
MacDonald
,
G. A.
,
Sharrard
,
K. A.
, and
Taylor
,
M. C.
, “
Preliminary Athropometric Survey of Canadian Forces Women
,”
Defense and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine
,
Downsview, Ontario, Canada
,
1978
.
21.
Manual of Measurements: Study of Body Measurements for Sizing Women's Garments and Patterns
,”
U.S. Bureau of Home Economics
,
Washington, D.C.
,
09
1939
.
22.
Morrison
,
I. F.
,
Wyndham
,
L. T.
,
Strydon
,
M. B.
,
Bettencourt
,
J. J.
, and
Vilfoen
,
J. M.
, “
An Anthropometrical Survey of Bangu Mine Labourers
,”
Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy
,
01
1965
.
23.
One-Part Geometric Last System
,”
United Shoe Machinery Corp.
,
Boston
,
01
1965
.
24.
Prahl
,
F. M.
, “
Last Standards and Technology
,”
American Shoemaking
,
16
06
1971
.
25.
Randall
,
F. E.
and
Munro
,
E. H.
, “
Reference Antropometry of Army Women
,” Report No. 149,
U.S. Army QM Climatic Research Laboratory
, Lawrence, Mass.
1949
.
26.
Ressler
,
D. D.
, “
The Need for Specialized Shoe Lasts to Accommodate the Commosty Occurring Foot Pathologies and Gross Structural Deviations
,”
Journal of the American Medical Assn.
,
03
1961
.
27.
Roebuck
,
J. A.
,
Engineering Anthropometry Methods
,
Wiley-Interscience
,
New York
,
1975
.
28.
Size Distributions of Adults' Shoes
,”
E. I. DuPont de Newmours & Co.
,
Wilmington
, Del.
03
1964
.
29.
Study of Footwear Sizes
,”
National Shoe Mfrs. Assn.
,
New York
,
09
1964
.
30.
The True Story of Shoe Sizes
,”
Sterling Last Corp.
,
New York
,
1979
.
31.
White
,
R. M.
and
Churchill
,
E.
, “
The Body Size of Soldiers
,”
U.S. Army Natick Laboratories
,
Natick, Mass.
1971
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.