Abstract

Traditional equations for determining shear modulus for beams are based on several simplifying assumptions. Although these assumptions are reasonably accurate for isotropic homogenous beams, they can introduce large errors when applied to beams of structural lumber that are not isotropic or homogeneous.

This paper examines the sensitivity of the traditional equations to various parameters and concludes that the edition of 1983 and the previous editions of ASTM Methods for Static Tests of Timbers in Structural Sizes (D 198) were not suitable for determination of shear modulus in structural lumber. An alternative test method currently used in Europe was proposed. Based on the considerations in this paper, this method was adopted in the 1984 edition of ASTM D 198.

References

1.
Kass
,
A. J.
, “
Middle Ordinate Method Measures Stiffness Variation Within Pieces of Lumber
,”
Forest Products Journal
 0015-7473, Vol.
25
, No.
3
,
1974
, pp.
33
-
41
.
2.
Timoshenko
,
S. P.
and
Goodier
,
J. N.
,
Theory of Elasticity
, 3rd ed.,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
,
1970
.
3.
Choi
,
I.
and
Horgan
,
C. O.
, “
Saint-Venant's Principle and Effects in Anisotropic Elasticity
,”
Journal of Applied Mechanics, Transactions of ASME
,
09
1977
, pp.
424
-
430
.
4.
Gerhardt
,
T. D.
and
Liu
,
J. Y.
, “
Orthotropic Beams under Normal and Shear Loading
,”
Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Proceedings of ASCE
, Vol.
109
, No.
2
,
04
1983
, pp.
394
-
410
.
5.
Cowper
,
G. R.
, “
The Shear Coefficient in Timoshenko's Beam Theory
,”
Journal of Applied Mechanics, Transactions of ASME
,
06
1966
, pp.
335
-
340
.
6.
Joint Committee RILEM/CIB-3TT: Testing Methods of Timber
, “
Testing Methods for Timber in Structural Sizes
,” Recommendation to ISO CommitteeTC 165,
Materiaux et Constructions
, Vol.
11
, No.
66
,
1978
, pp.
445
-
452
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.