Abstract

In this study, a solar-driven reduction process of nonstoichiometric cerium oxide in a fixed bed is optimized for efficient water splitting via metal-oxide-based redox cycling. Nitrogen is used as sweeping gas to scavenge oxygen from the beds during the reduction process. A transient lumped heat transfer model is developed for the simulation of the process. Parametric analysis and genetic algorithm are used to find the optimal N2 flow rate and establish a novel N2 feeding strategy with variable flow to maximize the thermal efficiency for water splitting. An efficiency close to 13% is estimated without solid-phase heat recovery, which is more than twice that of the best present experimental systems (∼5%). The results are regarded preliminary as a thermodynamic analysis.

1 Introduction

Hydrogen and carbon monoxide are clean and carbon-neutral alternative fuels that can be produced from renewable energy sources such as solar energy. There are three main paths for producing H2/CO from H2O/CO2 using solar energy: the solar electrochemical, photochemical, and solar thermochemical routes [1]. In the solar thermochemical route, solar radiation of the entire solar spectrum is concentrated to obtain the high temperature required to drive the thermochemical cycles [2]. Through thermochemical cycles, the products of water splitting, H2/CO and O2, are generated in different steps of the thermochemical cycles, bypassing the fuel/oxygen separation issue. Meanwhile, the thermochemical cycles are operated at temperatures significantly lower than thermolysis (>2500 K) [3]. Thermochemical cycles with different numbers of reaction steps are available for water splitting [46]. The two-step redox cycles are most promising due to their simplicity and high theoretical efficiency [1]. Such systems employ concentrated solar radiation as a high-temperature heat source to drive an endothermic reduction reaction [7]. The reduced metal-oxide is then oxidized with the water/CO2 and syngas is produced [8,9].

A wide variety of metal-oxide redox pairs were investigated to conduct the two-step redox cycle, such as Fe3O4/FeO, TiO2/TiOx, Mn3O4/MnO, Co3O4/CoO, and ZnO/Zn [1015]. The CeO2 (ceria) offers a major promise for efficient fuel generation due to its fast kinetics and crystallographic stability [6,16]. Various experimental studies have investigated the thermodynamics of reactive cerium-based oxides [17]. High-temperature thermodynamic data of undoped and doped ceria have become available for analyzing the thermodynamic processes involving ceria [8,1721].

Many solar reactor concepts have been proposed for metal-oxide redox cycles including integrated receiver reactors with moving or stationary fixed beds of redox materials, separated reactors with fluidized beds, and others, e.g., aerosol flow reactors [2232]. The majority of the reactor systems demonstrated so far were based on the fixed-bed type due to the design simplicity and convenient operation [33]. Three generations of solar cavity receiver/reactors containing porous monolithic ceria with multi-scale porosity were developed, achieving consecutive redox cycles for solar fuel production at different power scales [16,22,3436]. A solar-to-fuel energy efficiency of 5.25% was reported in 2017, which is the current world record for the thermochemical splitting of CO2 into CO and O2 [37].

Solar-driven reduction is the crucial phase of thermochemical H2/CO production, influencing the overall thermal efficiency. According to experimental data, thermodynamically, ceria reduction is favored at high temperatures and low oxygen partial pressure [18]. Prior studies have demonstrated that cavity-shape receivers enable to reach a high temperature as exposed in high-flux solar irradiation (∼3000 suns). However, as ceria undergoes a phase change at temperatures above 2100 K, the maximum reduction temperature is limited [38,39]. On the other hand, two methods are commonly used to achieve a low oxygen partial pressure: vacuum pumping and inert gas sweeping. Here we focused on the latter one because of its advantages in solid-phase heat recovery. Inert gases, e.g., nitrogen or argon, were used as oxygen scavengers to sweep the reactant bodies and carry away released oxygen during the reduction process. References [16,34,35] showed the experimental steps for sweeping strategies of inert gases. The solar reduction is a complex mass and heat transfer process with intense nonlinear temperature changes due to reduction rates, cavity heat emissions, heat losses by gas flows, etc. Optimal solutions with regard to the nonlinear process have not been explored sufficiently yet. First, the absence of a general definition of the characteristic parameter for optimal reaction duration impeded understanding the mechanism for this kind of solar-driven fixed-bed thermal reduction processes. Optimal duration should be determined by weighing the increase of chemical enthalpies and heat losses over time. Also, the global optimization issue related to variable inert gas feeding strategies was lack of comprehensive analysis to maximize overall thermal efficiency. These research gaps are the main focus of this paper. As the genetic algorithm (GA) constitutes a broadly applicable base for stochastic and global optimization [40] and multi-variate optimizing problems [41], we employed it here to address the optimization issue of N2 feeding strategy. The novel N2 feeding strategy presented in this study outperforms the state-of-the-art strategies and results in an unprecedented thermal efficiency.

The paper presents the transient model for a cavity fixed-bed reduction system using a lumped parameter method based on energy balance equations in Sec. 2. Section 3 presents (1) the results of the reduction heat loss and thermal efficiency and the best reducing time under different scales of constant flowrates of sweeping gas and (2) the optimal solutions of variable flowrates found by the genetic algorithm under specific conditions. A conclusion is given in Sec. 4.

2 Modeling

The two-step ceria redox cycle consists of a high-temperature endothermic reduction step and a low-temperature exothermic oxidation step:
1ΔδCeO2δox1ΔδCeO2δred+12O2
(1)
1ΔδCeO2δred+H2O1ΔδCeO2δox+H2
(2a)
1ΔδCeO2δred+CO21ΔδCeO2δox+CO
(2b)

The schematics of the initial and final phases of the solar-driven ceria-based fixed-bed reduction system are illustrated in Fig. 1. The system consists of a cavity reactor and gas-phase heat exchangers (HXers). For the initial phase, transient thermodynamic states in the system are denoted by numbered circles ①–④ as SP1–SP4. The thin solid arrows and thick hollowed arrows indicate the flow of mass and energy, respectively. The rectangular dash border denotes the system boundary. Subscripts of temperatures represent the phase and state points (SPs), e.g., T0,2 denotes the temperature at the initial phase point and SP2. Purified N2 with low oxygen partial pressure (PO2,0=105) is used. It enters the system at ambient temperature and pressure (SP1) in a transient flowrate m˙N2, preheated by the HXer to SP2 before entering the cavity. A certain amount of nonstoichiometric cerium oxide is filled in the cavity. It is reduced with concentrated solar irradiation and sweeping gas. The released O2 is carried away by the N2 flow, which is reheated to SP3. After passing through the HXer again, the mixture gases leave the system at SP4. The following assumptions and baseline parameters are used in the system model:

  1. The geometries of the cavity reactor, HXer, and pipes are not considered.

  2. Direct normal irradiation is set to 1000 W/m2 according to the solar radiation resource available in the western region of China [42].

  3. Solar flux concentration ratio is set to 30002 unless otherwise specified [3,43].

  4. Heat losses from conduction are lumped into the Qcond with a loss fraction FC set to 0.2 [38,44].

  5. Effectiveness of gas-phase heat recovery ɛ refers to 95% according to current manufacturing levels of heat exchangers [4446].

  6. Reduction process is in a quasi-equilibrium thermodynamic state.

  7. Ceria is treated as homogeneous and isotropic and gases are ideal.

  8. Modeling of oxidation is assumed as complete water splitting at constant Tox equal to 1100 K.

Fig. 1
Schematic of the solar-driven ceria-based fixed-bed reduction process model at the initial (t = 0) and final (t = τ) phases
Fig. 1
Schematic of the solar-driven ceria-based fixed-bed reduction process model at the initial (t = 0) and final (t = τ) phases
Close modal

2.1 Balance Equation.

First, the energy balance equation is given as follows:
Qsolar=Qrad+Qcond+Qgas+Qsen+ΔHchem
(3)
The term on the left-hand side of Eq. (3) represents the total solar energy input. The terms on the right-hand side sequentially are cavity radiative loss (Qrad), cavity conductive loss (Qcond), gas-phase heat recovery loss (Qgas), sensible heat of ceria (Qsen), and increment of chemical enthalpy of ceria (ΔHchem). They are expressed in Eqs. (4)(9). The fractions Frad, Fcond, Fgas, Fsen, and Fchem are defined as the ratios of the corresponding loss or enthalpy increment terms divided by Qsolar.
Qsolar=0τQ˙solardt
(4)
Qrad=0τσT4CIQ˙solardt
(5)
Qcond=FC(QsolarQrad)
(6)
Qgas=0τm˙N2cp,N2(1ε)(TT)dt+δintδmceriaMO22Mceriacp,O2(TT)dδ
(7)
Qsen=TrefTmceriacp,ceriadT
(8)
ΔHchem=δintδmceriaΔhO2(δ)2Mceriadδ
(9)
where Q˙solar is the incident solar power into the cavity; τ is the duration of reduction; C and I denote the concentration ratio and direct normal irradiation; FC is the conductive heat loss fraction; ɛ represents the effectiveness of gas-phase heat recovery; cp,N2 and cp,O2 are the average specific heat of N2 and O2 calculated by cp=ToxTreddh/TredTox; cp,ceria refers to Tref and pref; ΔhO2 and ΔsO2 are the reaction molar enthalpy and entropy as sixth-order polynomial curves fitted as a function of δ in the range of [0.006, 0.26] according to the data in Ref. [18].
Then, thermal efficiency ηth is defined as
ηth=mceriaΔδHHV2MceriaQsolar
(10)
where HHV is the higher heating value of H2.
In differential form, Eq. (3) is rewritten as
mceriacp,ceriadTdt=(1σT4CI)(1FC)Q˙solarmceria2Mceria[ΔhO2+MO2cp,O2(TT)]dδdtm˙N2cp,N2(1ε)(TT)
(11)
The relation of PO2 and m˙N2 is given as follows:
PO2=(mceria/2Mceria)(dδ/dt)(m˙N2/MN2)+(mceria/2Mceria)(dδ/dt)+PO2,0
(12)
As mentioned above, cavity reduction is assumed as a quasi-equilibrium process [22,35].The nonstoichiometry of ceria (δ) is calculated by Eq. (13). The initial diagram of isothermal log δ versus log PO2 and T for ceria is reproduced in Fig. 2 [18].
ΔhO2(δ)TΔsO2(δ)=RTlnPO2
(13)

In our case, ceria is reduced from the initial phase of nonstoichiometry (δint) to the final one (δfin) over a certain period. For any moment, δ equilibrates at corresponding T and PO2, obtained by a certain number of iterations with the unconstrained nonlinear optimization method. Equations (11) and (12) were discretized using the backward Euler method and incorporated it in the matlab program. The initial temperature (Tint) and oxygen partial pressure (PO2,int) are set to 1100 K and 10−2. Since the time scale of reduction varies with the mass of ceria, the specific time-step is defined as Δκ = Δt/mceria, set to 1 s/kgceria based on the trade-off between accuracy and CPU time needed. The baseline model parameters and expressions are given in Table 1.

Fig. 2
Isothermal log δ versus log PO2 for nonstoichiometric cerium oxide from 750 °C to 1500 °C (1023–1773 K). Reproduced with permission from Ref. [18]. Copyright 1975 by Elsevier.
Fig. 2
Isothermal log δ versus log PO2 for nonstoichiometric cerium oxide from 750 °C to 1500 °C (1023–1773 K). Reproduced with permission from Ref. [18]. Copyright 1975 by Elsevier.
Close modal
Table 1

Baseline model parameters and expressions

ParameterValue
Solar power input (Q˙solar)1000 W
Solar concentration ratio (C)3000
Solar irradiation (I)1000 W/m2
Gas-phase heat recovery effectiveness (ɛ)95%
Loss factor (FC)0.2
Oxidation temperature (Tox)1100 K
Reduction temperature (Tred)2100 K
Ambient temperature (T)298 K
Reference pressure (pref)1.013 × 105 Pa
Reference temperature (Tref)1500 K
VariableExpression
Specific heat of ceria (cp,ceria) [47]cp,ceria=[11T2T]AbJ/molKA=[67.9567.049.9×1059.9×1050.01250.014];b=[1δ0.182δ0.182]
Thermal enthalpy of N2(hN2) [38]hN2=c[T10312(T103)213(T103)314(T103)4103T1]TJ/molc={[19505.819887.18598.51369.8527.64935.2](500K<T<2000K)[35518.71128.7196.114.64553.818970.9](T2000K)
Thermal enthalpy of O2(hO2) [38]hO2=d[T10312(T103)213(T103)314(T103)4103T1]TJ/mold={[30032.48773.03988.1788.3741.611324.7](700K<T<2000K)[20911.110720.72020.5146.49245.75337.7](T2000K)
Reaction enthalpy and entropy ΔhO2 and ΔsO2 [18][ΔhO2ΔsO2]=[δ6δ5δ4δ3δ2δ1]B(J/mol(O2)J/molK(O2))B=[1.85603×10102.00056×1071.53556×10101.78760×1074.71416×1096.27177×1066.77803×1081.10624×1065.54153×1071.0818×1053.8812×1066.77051×1039.727395×1055.67226×102]
ParameterValue
Solar power input (Q˙solar)1000 W
Solar concentration ratio (C)3000
Solar irradiation (I)1000 W/m2
Gas-phase heat recovery effectiveness (ɛ)95%
Loss factor (FC)0.2
Oxidation temperature (Tox)1100 K
Reduction temperature (Tred)2100 K
Ambient temperature (T)298 K
Reference pressure (pref)1.013 × 105 Pa
Reference temperature (Tref)1500 K
VariableExpression
Specific heat of ceria (cp,ceria) [47]cp,ceria=[11T2T]AbJ/molKA=[67.9567.049.9×1059.9×1050.01250.014];b=[1δ0.182δ0.182]
Thermal enthalpy of N2(hN2) [38]hN2=c[T10312(T103)213(T103)314(T103)4103T1]TJ/molc={[19505.819887.18598.51369.8527.64935.2](500K<T<2000K)[35518.71128.7196.114.64553.818970.9](T2000K)
Thermal enthalpy of O2(hO2) [38]hO2=d[T10312(T103)213(T103)314(T103)4103T1]TJ/mold={[30032.48773.03988.1788.3741.611324.7](700K<T<2000K)[20911.110720.72020.5146.49245.75337.7](T2000K)
Reaction enthalpy and entropy ΔhO2 and ΔsO2 [18][ΔhO2ΔsO2]=[δ6δ5δ4δ3δ2δ1]B(J/mol(O2)J/molK(O2))B=[1.85603×10102.00056×1071.53556×10101.78760×1074.71416×1096.27177×1066.77803×1081.10624×1065.54153×1071.0818×1053.8812×1066.77051×1039.727395×1055.67226×102]

2.2 Parametric Analysis Method.

First, the conventional parametric analysis method (PAM) is used to search the optimal solutions for the highest thermal efficiencies (ηth) under the condition of constant N2 flowrates (m˙N2,const). The term m˙N2,const varies in the range of 4 × 10−5 to 0.0067 kg/s. Note that the reduction duration (τ) is proportional to the mass of ceria (mceria) under the same conditions. For simplicity, the specific duration (κ = τ/mceria) is used instead of τ in the parameter analysis. The optimized specific duration (κpot), corresponding to the maximum thermal efficiency (ηth,max), is found when ∂ηth/∂κ = 0, for given m˙N2,const.

2.3 Genetic Algorithm.

The genetic algorithm (GA) approach is used to seek the global optimization solution regarding the feeding strategy of variable inert gas flows. The GA is a probabilistic search procedure focusing on large spaces involving states that can be represented by strings based on the mechanics of natural selection and natural genetics [48]. It consists of four procedures: initialization, selection, reproduction, and termination. GA starts with the initial population, a set of random solutions represented by chromosomes. At each generation, each chromosome is evaluated to be selected or not according to the fitness function composed of one or multiple objectives. Then survivors randomly mate and produce the next generation of chromosomes while crossover and mutation randomly occur. Because chromosomes with high fitness values have a high probability of survival, the average fitness values of the new generation are higher than the old generation. The process is repeated until the stopping criteria, e.g., the limit of generation numbers or the function tolerance, are satisfied.

Here we use the GA code in Matlab Optimization Toolbox [49] to search the optimal solution of variable N2 flowrate (m˙N2,var) for achieving the peak thermal efficiency. First, we consider separating the reduction process into several stages. For each stage, a constant m˙N2,i is set as an independent variable. A vector of logarithmic variables (x) is assigned corresponding to different stages, expressed as
x=[x1x2xn];xi=lnm˙N2,imceria(2in10)
(14)
The fitness function is expressed as f(x) = 1/ηth(x). Constraints here mainly refer to the lower and upper bounds on the variables and the linear constraint function as Eqs. (15) and (16) show.
16xi2
(15)
xiln(1(σTi4/CI))(1FC)Q˙solarmceriacp,N2(1ε)(TiT)
(16)
where the bounds are set to ensure that the optimal solutions are all covered. The term Ti represents the temperature that the system should reach at the end of the ith stage, which constrains the maximum xi. For instance, if the reduction process is separated evenly into five stages based on five temperature sections, because the temperature range of reduction is (Tint, Tfin), Ti and five sections are then fixed by
Ti=Tint+i5(TfinTint)(1i5)
(17)
(Tint,T1)(T1,T2)(T2,T3)(T3,T4)(T4,Tfin)
(18)

Note that Eq. (16) is derived from Eqs. (11) and (14) to a limiting case, i.e., T = Ti, dT/dt = 0, and dδ/dt = 0, when t = ∞. It indicates a maximum xi allowed for the ith stage, ensuring that the target temperature (Ti) is attainable at the end of the ith stage.

Population sizes are set to 50 for n ≤ 5 and to 200 for n > 5. The creation function of initial population is specified as constraint dependent according to Eq. (16). Raw fitness scores returned by the fitness function are used to rank all individuals as input values for the stochastic uniform selection function. The number of individuals guaranteed to survive to the next generation is specified to 5% of population sizes, and the crossover fraction is set to 0.8. Mutation and crossover functions are specified as adaptive feasible and scattered. Optimizations are terminated when the average changes in the fitness values are less than 10−6.

3 Results and Discussion

3.1 Validation.

Prior to the optimization, the fitness function needs to be validated. Numerical and experimental data of the reducing processes via a fixed-bed of ceria are quantitatively compared for the validation [50]. First, the predicted results of O2 production rates (rO2), by Venstrom’s and the model developed in this study, are compared under the same operating conditions. The ceria is heated from 1013 K to 1748 K at a rate of 100 K/min followed by a steady state for 4 min under the same temperature and a constant N2 sweeping gas flow of 900 mL/(min · gceria). The mass of ceria is 1.0245 g. The initial δ is assumed as 10−5. Figure 3 shows that the numerical and experimental data are in good agreement. In addition, a horizontal reactor by an infrared imaging furnace was setup for achieving an isothermal condition for the reduction reaction reported in Venstrom’s work [50]. The reactor consists of a packed bed of ceria porous particles. Flowrates of the generated O2 were measured in real time using a Raman laser gas analyzer. Figures 4(a) and 4(b) compare the numerical results of the O2 production rate during reduction to the experimental data corresponding to N2 gas flowrates of 150 ml/(min g) and 300 ml/(min g) at constant reduction temperature of 1773 K. The shaded regions in the plots indicate the range of rates predicted by the model as a result of uncertainty in the initial δ (0.021 ± 0.002). In general, a good agreement in the numerical and experimental data indicates that our model can accurately predict the transient thermal reducing processes of fixed-bed ceria.

Fig. 3
Comparison of two fixed-bed reducing models during reduction with increasing temperature and constant N2 sweeping gas flow. The crosses and the dashed line represent results predicted by Venstrom’s and our models.
Fig. 3
Comparison of two fixed-bed reducing models during reduction with increasing temperature and constant N2 sweeping gas flow. The crosses and the dashed line represent results predicted by Venstrom’s and our models.
Close modal
Fig. 4
Comparison of predicted (gray areas) and measured (squares) data for N2 sweeping gas flows of (a) 150 ml/(min g) and (b) 300 ml/(min g) at a constant reduction temperature Tred = 1773 K
Fig. 4
Comparison of predicted (gray areas) and measured (squares) data for N2 sweeping gas flows of (a) 150 ml/(min g) and (b) 300 ml/(min g) at a constant reduction temperature Tred = 1773 K
Close modal

3.2 Optimal Specific Duration.

Figure 5 shows the bed temperature (T), the oxygen partial pressure (PO2), the thermal efficiency (ηth), and the nonstoichiometric number of ceria (δ) as a function of specific duration (κ) under the conditions of a constant N2 mass flow (m˙N2,const=0.005kg/s) and different concentration ratios (C varying from 1500 to 3000). As shown in Fig. 5(a), the bed temperature increases monotonously with time for a given solar concentration ratio. Temperature rises from 1100 K to 1816 K in 2 × 104 s/kg under the condition of m˙N2,const=0.005kg/s and C = 1500. With a greater C, the final temperature (Tfin) rises due to a lower cavity radiative loss. Temperatures 1907 K, 1978 K, and 2036 K are obtained at the end of reduction, corresponding to C = 2000, 2500, and 3000, respectively. The oxygen partial pressure increases first and then decreases with time. The peak value of PO2 increases with improved C. That is because, for given m˙N2,const, oxygen is more easily released from the bed during reduction under higher C.

Fig. 5
Evolutions of (a) temperature (T) and oxygen partial pressure (PO2) and (b) thermal efficiency (ηth) and nonstoichiometric number (δ) over specific duration (κ) under the conditions of the constant mass flowrate of N2, m˙N2,const=0.005kg/s, and different concentration ratios, C, varying from 1500 to 3000
Fig. 5
Evolutions of (a) temperature (T) and oxygen partial pressure (PO2) and (b) thermal efficiency (ηth) and nonstoichiometric number (δ) over specific duration (κ) under the conditions of the constant mass flowrate of N2, m˙N2,const=0.005kg/s, and different concentration ratios, C, varying from 1500 to 3000
Close modal

Figure 5(b) shows that δ increases monotonously in the whole range of κ while the slope increases first and then declines. The maximum ηth exists against κ corresponding to the optimal specific duration κopt. It implies that efficient solar-to-fuel conversion does not necessarily require large δ. The optimal efficiency ηth,max is affected by two confronting effects of the sweep gas flowrate m˙N2,const: (1) low partial pressure of oxygen is achieved by introducing the flow of sweeping gas which can in turn promote the reduction extent of ceria and (2) gas sweeping causes heat losses which can only be partially recovered by a gas-phase heat exchanger. The optimal efficiency ηth,max is found at the stationary point where (∂ηth/∂κ) = 0. For example, for m˙N2,const=0.005kg/s and C = 1500, ηth,max is found at δ = 0.028 which is less than half of the peak value of 0.07. In addition, with larger C, ηth,max and κopt are both increased. As shown in Fig. 5(b), ηth,max is only 2.4% obtained at κopt = 1890 s/kg for C = 1500, that is increased to 4.3% at larger κopt = 2600 s/kg for C = 3000.

The share of different energy fractions (F) varying with specific duration (κ) is given in Fig. 6. At the initial stage of reduction, sensible heat loss contributes the largest fraction, Fsen, accounting for 52% of the total energy input, followed by gas-phase heat recovery loss, Fgas, for 25%, and conductive loss, Fcond, for 19%. The radiative loss fraction, Frad, is merely 3% at beginning. Significant change of the share is observed as κ increases to 104 s/kg. Fsen shrinks to only 10% of its initial value. Meanwhile, Fgas and Frad increase up to 50% and 27% rapidly and become the most major fractions. Fcond is less significant, accounting for 14%. It shows that the share approaches to the steady state over a certain time, i.e., κ > 2 × 104 s/kg. More than 96% of the total energy input is consumed by the heat losses from gas-phase transport, cavity radiation, and conduction. Fgas, Frad, and Fcond account for 52%, 30%, and 14%, respectively. Fchem represents the ratio of chemical energy stored in reduced ceria which determines the final thermal efficiency. During reduction, Fchem first increases, then drops down after reaching a peak value of 6.7%, and finally returns to zero.

Fig. 6
Share of different energy fractions (F) over specific duration (κ) in a constant mass flowrate of N2, m˙N2,const=0.005kg/s, under the concentration ratio, C = 3000. Five fractions are shown referring to the radiative loss (Frad), conductive loss (Fcond), gas-phase heat loss (Fgas), sensible heat loss (Fsen), and increment of chemical enthalpy (Fchem).
Fig. 6
Share of different energy fractions (F) over specific duration (κ) in a constant mass flowrate of N2, m˙N2,const=0.005kg/s, under the concentration ratio, C = 3000. Five fractions are shown referring to the radiative loss (Frad), conductive loss (Fcond), gas-phase heat loss (Fgas), sensible heat loss (Fsen), and increment of chemical enthalpy (Fchem).
Close modal

3.3 Optimization of Constant N2 Flow.

Figure 7 shows the results of maximum thermal efficiencies (ηth,max) as functions of constant mass flows of N2(m˙N2,const). The curve of black spots represents the distribution of ηth,max against κ neglecting the temperature constraint. The peak ηth,max, i.e., the optimal efficiency (ηth,opt1), is 12.6%, found at m˙N2=3.5×104kg/s. However, ηth,opt1 is overestimated because reduction temperature has exceeded the upper limit for ceria material (2100 K). The second curve of spots shows results with the temperature constraint, i.e., Tmax < 2100 K. The optimal efficiency (ηth,opt2) is reduced to 11.1% found at m˙N2=8.2×104kg/s. The gap between two curves reflects the influence by the temperature constraint. In the actual experiments, the reactor should be operated below the temperature limit to avoid phase change of ceria. If the time it takes to reach temperature limit is shorter than the optimal operating duration, the optimal thermal efficiency will not be achieved. However, with increased m˙N2, the two curves gradually approach and finally coincide. The overlap threshold is found at m˙N2=2.5×103kg/s. For any higher sweep gas mass flowrates, the peak temperature in the reactor within the optimal operating duration will not exceed the limit of 2100 K.

Fig. 7
Maximum thermal efficiency (ηth,max) versus constant flowrate of N2(m˙N2,const) with and without temperature constraint (Tmax = 2100 K). Mass of ceria (mceria) varies from 0.1 to 1 kg.
Fig. 7
Maximum thermal efficiency (ηth,max) versus constant flowrate of N2(m˙N2,const) with and without temperature constraint (Tmax = 2100 K). Mass of ceria (mceria) varies from 0.1 to 1 kg.
Close modal

The whole domain in Fig. 7 can be separated into three phases: the logarithmic phase, joint phase, and linear phase. For instance, Eq. (19) gives the piecewise fitting function according to the curve with the temperature constraint in Fig. 6. Coefficients are given in Table 2.

ηth,max={a1lnm˙N2+c1m˙N2(4×105kg/s,3×104kg/s)a2lnm˙N2+b2m˙N2+c2m˙N2(3×104kg/s,2.5×103kg/s)b3m˙N2+c3m˙N2(2.5×103kg/s,6×103kg/s)
(19)
Table 2

Coefficient values for the fitting functions of maximum thermal efficiencies versus mass flowrates of N2

CoefficientValueR2
a10.010081
c10.1877
a20.016590.9996
b2−23.01
c20.2477
b3−19.150.9988
c30.1389
CoefficientValueR2
a10.010081
c10.1877
a20.016590.9996
b2−23.01
c20.2477
b3−19.150.9988
c30.1389

For the logarithmic phase, the gas-phase heat loss (Qgas) is relatively low due to the small scale of m˙N2. The optimal efficiency ηth,max is mainly limited by the high oxygen partial pressure. It is shown that ηth,maxlnm˙N2 when m˙N2<3×104kg/s, which can be explained by Eqs. (12) and (13): m˙N2 is inversely proportional to PO2, which has a negative logarithmic relationship with ηth,max. For the linear phase, ηth,max is mainly limited by Qgas which has become a dominant factor to thermal performance. From the figure, we can tell ηth,maxm˙N2 when m˙N2>2.5×103kg/s. Equation (7) also shows that Qgas increases with m˙N2 in linear relation. For the joint phase, the dual effect of sweeping gas co-exists and the combination is used.

Figure 8 shows the results of the final temperature (Tfin) and the radiative efficiency (ηrad)3 as functions of the mass flowrate of N2(m˙N2). The curves in hollowed circles and squares show the results without the temperature constraint, Tfin reaches up to 2380 K when m˙N2=4×105kg/s corresponding to the lowest ηrad of 67.6%. After that, Tfin decreases gradually while ηrad keeps increasing with increasing m˙N2. The curves in solid spots and pluses represent the results with the temperature constraint. The radiative absorption efficiency ηrad is improved compared to that without the temperature constraint when m˙N2<2.5×103kg/s. After that, similar to Fig. 7, the two sets of data coincide. The value of ηrad exceeds beyond 75% over the whole range of m˙N2. The minimum value equals 77.8% found at the overlap point.

Fig. 8
Final temperature (Tfin) and cavity radiative efficiency (ηrad) versus constant flowrate of N2(m˙N2,const) with and without temperature constraint (Tmax = 2100 K). Mass of ceria (mceria) varies from 0.1 to 1 kg.
Fig. 8
Final temperature (Tfin) and cavity radiative efficiency (ηrad) versus constant flowrate of N2(m˙N2,const) with and without temperature constraint (Tmax = 2100 K). Mass of ceria (mceria) varies from 0.1 to 1 kg.
Close modal

Figure 9 shows the results of the energy fractions (F) corresponding to the maximum thermal efficiency (ηth,max) in different constant mass flowrates of N2(m˙N2,const). Fsen is the major fraction among all when m˙N2<4×105kg/s, accounting for more than 50%, followed by Frad = 18.6%, Fcond = 16.3%, Fchem = 13.6%, and Fgas = 12.4%. With increased m˙N2, Fsen and Fgas vary significantly while the change of other energy fractions keeps in a relatively small range. The sensible fraction Fsen falls below 25.0% lower than Fgas as m˙N2 increases to 2.5 × 10−3 kg/s. Meanwhile, Frad slightly increases and approaches to the peak value of 22.2%. The conduction fraction Fcond remains between 15% and 16%. The chemical energy storage fraction Fchem is reduced to 13.7% making it the smallest fraction. In the range of m˙N2>2.5×103kg/s, Fgas becomes the dominant fraction which eventually exceeds 50%. Fractions Fcond, Fsen, and Frad are similar, between 12% and 18%. By contrast, Fchem decreases rapidly and drops to 3.4% when m˙N2=6.7×103kg/s.

Fig. 9
Energy fractions (F) corresponding to maximum thermal efficiencies (ηth,max) versus constant mass flowrate of N2(m˙N2,const) with the temperature constraint
Fig. 9
Energy fractions (F) corresponding to maximum thermal efficiencies (ηth,max) versus constant mass flowrate of N2(m˙N2,const) with the temperature constraint
Close modal

3.4 Optimization of Variable N2 Flow.

In this section, we go further to discuss the optimization issues using variable N2 flows (m˙N2,var). The mass flowrate of N2 is under transient control during thermal reduction. GA is used for searching the globally optimal solutions.

Figure 10 shows the results of optimal solutions for different variable numbers: n = 2, 3, 5, and 10. For given n, the logarithmic variable (xi) increases linearly with temperature.4 With increased variable numbers, the slope increases, thus leads to a higher thermal efficiency (ηth). To be specific, the increment of xi is 4.9, 8.4, 9.0, and 10.4 ln(1/s), for n = 2, 3, 5, and 10, when temperature increased from 1100 K to 2100 K. Correspondingly, ηth is 11.4%, 11.5%, 11.8%, and 12.1%. Due to the limitation of GA in optimization for large variable numbers, it is impractical to approach the optimal solution by increasing n. Instead, the linear correlation is used to express x as a function of T as follows:
x=xint+xfinxintTfinTint(TTint)
(20)
where xint and xfin represent the initial and final values of x during thermal reduction which are found by GA equal to −737 and −4.272 ln(1/s), respectively.
Fig. 10
Results of optimized logarithmic variables (xi) using genetic algorithm for different variable numbers, n = 2, 3, 5, and 10. The mass of ceria is set to 0.2 kg.
Fig. 10
Results of optimized logarithmic variables (xi) using genetic algorithm for different variable numbers, n = 2, 3, 5, and 10. The mass of ceria is set to 0.2 kg.
Close modal

Figures 11 and 12 show the results of temperature (T), oxygen partial pressure (PO2), nonstoichiometry (δ), and thermal efficiency (ηth), as the functions of the specific duration (κ) in the variable N2 flow (m˙N2,var) according to Eq. (20). As shown in Fig. 11, the reduction process is recognized into two stages: (1) T increases at a constant PO2 and (2) PO2 decreases at a constant T. For the first stage (κ < 910 s/kg), the sweeping flow is neglectable, thus air inside the cavity is almost stagnant. As generated O2 is accumulated, PO2 increases rapidly and approaches 1. Reduction is driven by increasing temperature only. The nonstoichiometry of ceria (δ) increases from the initial value 3.2 × 10−5 to 0.036 during the first stage. For the second stage (κ > 910 s/kg), as T approaches to the peak value of 2100 K, PO2 is reduced by increasing m˙N2. Therefore, δ is further increased under a quasi-isothermal condition, finally reaching 0.109 at T = 2100 K and PO2=2.3×103.

Fig. 11
Evolution of logarithmic O2 partial pressure and nonstoichiometric number (lnPO2andlnδ) and temperature (T) over specific duration (κ) for the optimal case of variable N2 flow (m˙N2,var)
Fig. 11
Evolution of logarithmic O2 partial pressure and nonstoichiometric number (lnPO2andlnδ) and temperature (T) over specific duration (κ) for the optimal case of variable N2 flow (m˙N2,var)
Close modal
Fig. 12
Thermal efficiency (ηth) and mass flowrate of N2(m˙N2) vary over specific duration (κ) for the optimal case of variable N2 flow
Fig. 12
Thermal efficiency (ηth) and mass flowrate of N2(m˙N2) vary over specific duration (κ) for the optimal case of variable N2 flow
Close modal

Figure 12 shows the curves of thermal efficiency (ηth) and sweeping flowrate (m˙N2) over specific durations (κ). The sweeping flowrate keeps lower than10−6 kg/s during the first stage, then rapidly increases to 2.8 × 10−3 kg/s at the end of the second stage. The thermal efficiency keeps increasing with κ which eventually reaches the optimal value, 12.9%. Two peaks of ηth during thermal reduction were observed. One is found in the mid-to-late first stage, ∼600 s/kg, and the other at the beginning of the second stage, ∼950 s/kg. It implies that the principle of the optimal strategy for ceria reduction in a fixed-bed model is first to increase T rapidly and then decrease PO2 rapidly when approaching to Tmax.

Figure 13 compares two optimal cases with respect to constant and variable N2 flows by pie diagrams. Thermal performance is improved based on the strategy of variable flows compared to that of constant flows. The gas-phase heat loss fraction (Fgas) is reduced from 7.8% to 5.5% by 29.5%. As a result, the chemical storage fraction (Fchem) increases from 17.0% to 19.3% by 13.5%.

Fig. 13
Different energy fractions for two optimal cases: (a) constant N2 flow and (b) variable N2 flow
Fig. 13
Different energy fractions for two optimal cases: (a) constant N2 flow and (b) variable N2 flow
Close modal

4 Conclusions

In this paper, a transient fixed-bed model was proposed for the solar-driven ceria-based thermal reduction. Under the baseline conditions, the N2 feeding strategies of constant and variable flows were discussed by PAM and genetic algorithm. The main conclusions are as follows:

The extreme point of the thermal efficiency corresponds to the optimal reduction duration for a given constant N2 flowrate. Without the temperature constraint, the maximum thermal efficiency reaches 12.6% in the optimal N2 flowrate of 3.5 × 10−4 kg/s. By contrast, the maximum efficiency drops to 11.1% with the temperature constraint, i.e., T < 2100 K. The optimal N2 flowrate is 8.2 × 10−4 kg/s.

The flowrate was optimized with genetic algorithm for the feeding strategy of variable N2 flowrate. Compared to the optimal case of constant N2 flow, the thermal efficiency was increased by 16.2%. The optimal strategy involves the two steps of isobaric heating and isothermal compression.

Footnotes

2

Note that although C is typically obtained at the level of 1000 and 3000 for the existing central tower and paraboloidal dish systems, higher values of C can be achieved by the incorporation of non-imaging secondary concentrators at the solar receiver aperture.

3

ηrad is defined as (1 − Frad) representing the cavity radiative absorption efficiency.

4

Note that some deviations may exist in the result for n = 10 due to the uncertainty caused by a large variable number.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (No. 51736006) and the Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Southeast University.

Nomenclature

m =

mass, kg

p =

absolute pressure, Pa

C =

concentration ratio

F =

energy fraction

H =

molar thermal enthalpy, J/mol

I =

direct normal irradiation, W/m2

M =

molar mass, kg/mol

P =

relative partial pressure

Q =

thermal energy, J

T =

temperature, K

m˙ =

mass flowrate, kg/s

x =

vector of logarithmic variables, ln(1/s)

Q˙ =

power, W

cp =

specific heat at constant pressure, J/(kg K)

FC =

conductive heat loss fraction

Greek Symbols

Δκ =

specific time-step, s/kg

Δt =

time-step, s

Δδ =

change in nonstoichiometry

ΔhO2 =

reaction molar enthalpy of ceria, J/mol(O2)

ΔsO2 =

reaction molar entropy of ceria, J/(mol(O2) K)

ΔH =

enthalpy difference, J

δ =

nonstoichiometry

ɛ =

heat recovery effectiveness, %

ηth =

thermal efficiency, %

κ =

specific reaction duration, s/kg

τ =

reaction duration, s

Subscripts

chem =

chemical

cond =

conductive

cons =

constant

fin =

finishing

gas =

gas phase

int =

initial

max =

maximum

opt =

optimal

ox =

oxidation

rad =

radiative

red =

reduction

ref =

reference

sen =

sensitive

solar =

solar energy

var =

variable

∞ =

ambient

References

1.
Steinfeld
,
A.
,
2005
, “
Solar Thermochemical Production of Hydrogen––A Review
,”
Sol. Energy
,
78
(
5
), pp.
603
615
.
2.
Muhich
,
C. L.
,
Ehrhart
,
B. D.
,
Al-Shankiti
,
I.
,
Ward
,
B. J.
,
Musgrave
,
C. B.
, and
Weimer
,
A. W.
,
2016
, “
A Review and Perspective of Efficient Hydrogen Generation Via Solar Thermal Water Splitting
,”
Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Energy Environ.
,
5
(
3
), pp.
261
287
.
3.
Romero
,
M.
, and
Steinfeld
,
A.
,
2012
, “
Concentrating Solar Thermal Power and Thermochemical Fuels
,”
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
5
(
11
), pp.
9234
9245
.
4.
Funk
,
J. E.
, and
Reinstrom
,
R. M.
,
1966
, “
Energy Requirements in Production of Hydrogen From Water
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev.
,
5
(
3
), pp.
336
342
.
5.
Funk
,
J. E.
,
2001
, “
Thermochemical Hydrogen Production: Past and Present
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
26
(
3
), pp.
185
190
.
6.
Abanades
,
S.
,
Legal
,
A.
,
Cordier
,
A.
,
Peraudeau
,
G.
,
Flamant
,
G.
, and
Julbe
,
A.
,
2010
, “
Investigation of Reactive Cerium-Based Oxides for H2 Production by Thermochemical Two-Step Water-Splitting
,”
J. Mater. Sci.
,
45
(
15
), pp.
4163
4173
.
7.
Licht
,
S.
,
2005
, “
Thermochemical Solar Hydrogen Generation
,”
ChemInform
,
36
(
37
), pp.
4635
4646
.
8.
Bulfin
,
B.
,
Vieten
,
J.
,
Agrafiotis
,
C.
,
Roeb
,
M.
, and
Sattler
,
C.
,
2017
, “
Applications and Limitations of Two Step Metal Oxide Thermochemical Redox Cycles: A Review
,”
J. Mater. Chem. A
,
5
(
36
), pp.
18951
18966
.
9.
Marxer
,
D. A.
,
Furler
,
P.
,
Scheffe
,
J. R.
,
Geerlings
,
H.
, and
Steinfeld
,
A.
,
2015
, “
Demonstration of the Entire Production Chain to Renewable Kerosene Via Solar Thermochemical Splitting of H2O and CO2
,”
Energy Fuels
,
29
(
5
), pp.
3241
3250
.
10.
Nakamura
,
T.
,
1977
, “
Hydrogen Production From Water Utilizing Solar Heat at High Temperatures
,”
Sol. Energy
,
19
(
5
), pp.
467
475
.
11.
Palumbo
,
R.
,
Campbell
,
M.
, and
Grafe
,
T.
,
1992
, “
High-Temperature Solar Thermal Processing Zn (s) and CO From ZnO (s) and C (gr) Using Ti2O3 (s) and TiO2 (s)
,”
Energy
,
17
(
2
), pp.
179
190
.
12.
Sibieude
,
F.
,
Ducarroir
,
M.
,
Tofighi
,
A.
, and
Ambriz
,
J.
,
1982
, “
High Temperature Experiments With a Solar Furnace: The Decomposition of Fe3O4, Mn3O4, CdO
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
7
(
1
), pp.
79
88
.
13.
Lundberg
,
M.
,
1993
, “
Model Calculations on Some Feasible Two-Step Water Splitting Processes
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
18
(
5
), pp.
369
376
.
14.
Palumbo
,
R.
,
Lédé
,
J.
,
Boutin
,
O.
,
Ricart
,
E. E.
,
Steinfeld
,
A.
,
Möller
,
S.
,
Weidenkaff
,
A.
,
Fletcher
,
E. A.
, and
Bielicki
,
J.
,
1998
, “
The Production of Zn From ZnO in a High-Temperature Solar Decomposition Quench Process—I. The Scientific Framework for the Process
,”
Chem. Eng. Sci.
,
53
(
14
), pp.
2503
2517
.
15.
Wang
,
B.
,
Li
,
L.
,
Schäfer
,
F.
,
Pottas
,
J. J.
,
Kumar
,
A.
,
Wheeler
,
V. M.
, and
Lipiński
,
W.
,
2021
, “
Thermal Reduction of Iron–Manganese Oxide Particles in a High-Temperature Packed-Bed Solar Thermochemical Reactor
,”
Chem. Eng. J.
,
412
, p.
128255
.
16.
Furler
,
P.
,
Scheffe
,
J. R.
, and
Steinfeld
,
A.
,
2012
, “
Syngas Production by Simultaneous Splitting of H2O and CO2 Via Ceria Redox Reactions in a High-Temperature Solar Reactor
,”
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
5
(
3
), pp.
6098
6103
.
17.
Bevan
,
D.
, and
Kordis
,
J.
,
1964
, “
Mixed Oxides of the Type MO2 (Fluorite)—M2O3—I Oxygen Dissociation Pressures and Phase Relationships in the System CeO2/Ce2O3 at High Temperatures
,”
J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem.
,
26
(
9
), pp.
1509
1523
.
18.
Panlener
,
R.
,
Blumenthal
,
R.
, and
Garnier
,
J.
,
1975
, “
A Thermodynamic Study of Nonstoichiometric Cerium Dioxide
,”
J. Phys. Chem. Solids
,
36
(
11
), pp.
1213
1222
.
19.
Sørensen
,
O. T.
,
1976
, “
Thermodynamic Studies of the Phase Relationships of Nonstoichiometric Cerium Oxides at Higher Temperatures
,”
J. Solid State Chem.
,
18
(
3
), pp.
217
233
.
20.
Bulfin
,
B.
,
Hoffmann
,
L.
,
de Oliveira
,
L.
,
Knoblauch
,
N.
,
Call
,
F.
,
Roeb
,
M.
,
Sattler
,
C.
, and
Schmücker
,
M.
,
2016
, “
Statistical Thermodynamics of Non-Stoichiometric Ceria and Ceria Zirconia Solid Solutions
,”
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
,
18
(
33
), pp.
23147
23154
.
21.
Hao
,
Y.
,
Yang
,
C.-K.
, and
Haile
,
S. M.
,
2014
, “
Ceria–Zirconia Solid Solutions (Ce1–xZrxO2−δ, x ≤ 0.2) for Solar Thermochemical Water Splitting: A Thermodynamic Study
,”
Chem. Mater.
,
26
(
20
), pp.
6073
6082
.
22.
Zoller
,
S.
,
Koepf
,
E.
,
Roos
,
P.
, and
Steinfeld
,
A.
,
2019
, “
Heat Transfer Model of a 50 kW Solar Receiver–Reactor for Thermochemical Redox Cycling Using Cerium Dioxide
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
141
(
2
), p.
021014
.
23.
Kaneko
,
H.
,
Miura
,
T.
,
Fuse
,
A.
,
Ishihara
,
H.
,
Taku
,
S.
,
Fukuzumi
,
H.
,
Naganuma
,
Y.
, and
Tamaura
,
Y.
,
2007
, “
Rotary-Type Solar Reactor for Solar Hydrogen Production With Two-Step Water Splitting Process
,”
Energy Fuels
,
21
(
4
), pp.
2287
2293
.
24.
Wei
,
B.
,
Fakhrai
,
R.
, and
Saadatfar
,
B.
,
2014
, “
Catalytic CO2 Conversion Via Solar-Driven Fluidized Bed Reactors
,”
Int. J. Low-Carbon Technol.
,
9
(
2
), pp.
127
134
.
25.
Koepf
,
E.
,
Villasmil
,
W.
, and
Meier
,
A.
,
2016
, “
Pilot-Scale Solar Reactor Operation and Characterization for Fuel Production Via the Zn/ZnO Thermochemical Cycle
,”
Appl. Energy
,
165
, pp.
1004
1023
.
26.
Bader
,
R.
,
Bala Chandran
,
R.
,
Venstrom
,
L. J.
,
Sedler
,
S. J.
,
Krenzke
,
P. T.
,
De Smith
,
R. M.
,
Banerjee
,
A.
,
Chase
,
T. R.
,
Davidson
,
J. H.
, and
Lipiński
,
W.
,
2015
, “
Design of a Solar Reactor to Split CO2 Via Isothermal Redox Cycling of Ceria
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
137
(
3
), p.
031007
.
27.
Lapp
,
J.
, and
Lipiński
,
W.
,
2014
, “
Transient Three-Dimensional Heat Transfer Model of a Solar Thermochemical Reactor for H2O and CO2 Splitting Via Nonstoichiometric Ceria Redox Cycling
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
136
(
3
), p.
031006
.
28.
Ermanoski
,
I.
,
Siegel
,
N. P.
, and
Stechel
,
E. B.
,
2013
, “
A New Reactor Concept for Efficient Solar-Thermochemical Fuel Production
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
135
(
3
), p.
031002
.
29.
Koepf
,
E.
,
Advani
,
S. G.
,
Steinfeld
,
A.
, and
Prasad
,
A. K.
,
2012
, “
A Novel Beam-Down, Gravity-Fed, Solar Thermochemical Receiver/Reactor for Direct Solid Particle Decomposition: Design, Modeling, and Experimentation
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
37
(
22
), pp.
16871
16887
.
30.
Welte
,
M.
,
Barhoumi
,
R.
,
Zbinden
,
A.
,
Scheffe
,
J. R.
, and
Steinfeld
,
A.
,
2016
, “
Experimental Demonstration of the Thermochemical Reduction of Ceria in a Solar Aerosol Reactor
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
,
55
(
40
), pp.
10618
10625
.
31.
Brkic
,
M.
,
Koepf
,
E.
, and
Meier
,
A.
,
2016
, “
Continuous Solar Carbothermal Reduction of Aerosolized ZnO Particles Under Vacuum in a Directly Irradiated Vertical-Tube Reactor
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
138
(
2
), p.
021010
.
32.
Wang
,
B.
,
Li
,
L.
,
Pottas
,
J. J.
,
Bader
,
R.
,
Kreider
,
P. B.
,
Wheeler
,
V. M.
, and
Lipiński
,
W.
,
2020
, “
Thermal Model of a Solar Thermochemical Reactor for Metal Oxide Reduction
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
142
(
5
), p.
051002
.
33.
Professorship of Renewable Energy Carrier
,” Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, https://prec.ethz.ch/research/solar-fuels.html, Accessed March 6, 2022.
34.
Chueh
,
W. C.
,
Falter
,
C.
,
Abbott
,
M.
,
Scipio
,
D.
,
Furler
,
P.
,
Haile
,
S. M.
, and
Steinfeld
,
A.
,
2012
, “
High-Flux Solar-Driven Thermochemical Dissociation of CO2 and H2O Using Nonstoichiometric Ceria
,”
Science
,
330
(
12
), pp.
1797
1801
.
35.
Furler
,
P.
, and
Steinfeld
,
A.
,
2015
, “
Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow Analysis of a 4 kW Solar Thermochemical Reactor for Ceria Redox Cycling
,”
Chem. Eng. Sci.
,
137
, pp.
373
383
.
36.
Hoes
,
M.
,
Ackermann
,
S.
,
Theiler
,
D.
,
Furler
,
P.
, and
Steinfeld
,
A.
,
2019
, “
Additive-Manufactured Ordered Porous Structures Made of Ceria for Concentrating Solar Applications
,”
Energy Technol.
,
7
(
9
), p.
1900484
.
37.
Marxer
,
D.
,
Furler
,
P.
,
Takacs
,
M.
, and
Steinfeld
,
A.
,
2017
, “
Solar Thermochemical Splitting of CO2 Into Separate Streams of CO and O2 With High Selectivity, Stability, Conversion, and Efficiency
,”
Energy Environ. Sci.
,
10
(
5
), pp.
1142
1149
.
38.
Bader
,
R.
,
Venstrom
,
L. J.
,
Davidson
,
J. H.
, and
Lipiński
,
W.
,
2013
, “
Thermodynamic Analysis of Isothermal Redox Cycling of Ceria for Solar Fuel Production
,”
Energy Fuels
,
27
(
9
), pp.
5533
5544
.
39.
Chueh
,
W. C.
, and
Haile
,
S. M.
,
2010
, “
A Thermochemical Study of Ceria: Exploiting an Old Material for New Modes of Energy Conversion and CO2 Mitigation
,”
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A
,
368
(
1923
), pp.
3269
3294
.
40.
Holland
,
J. H.
,
1992
, “
Genetic Algorithms
,”
Sci. Am.
,
267
(
1
), pp.
66
73
.
41.
Gutiérrez
,
F.
, and
Méndez
,
F.
,
2012
, “
Entropy Generation Minimization for the Thermal Decomposition of Methane Gas in Hydrogen Using Genetic Algorithms
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
55
, pp.
1
13
.
42.
Wang
,
J.
,
Yang
,
S.
,
Jiang
,
C.
,
Zhang
,
Y.
, and
Lund
,
P. D.
,
2017
, “
Status and Future Strategies for Concentrating Solar Power in China
,”
Energy Sci. Eng.
,
5
(
2
), pp.
100
109
.
43.
Li
,
L.
,
Yang
,
S.
,
Wang
,
B.
,
Pye
,
J.
, and
Lipiński
,
W.
,
2020
, “
Optical Analysis of a Solar Thermochemical System With a Rotating Tower Reflector and a Receiver–Reactor Array
,”
Opt. Express
,
28
(
13
), pp.
19429
19445
.
44.
Lapp
,
J.
,
Davidson
,
J. H.
, and
Lipiński
,
W.
,
2012
, “
Efficiency of Two-Step Solar Thermochemical Non-Stoichiometric Redox Cycles With Heat Recovery
,”
Energy
,
37
(
1
), pp.
591
600
.
45.
Yang
,
S.
,
Li
,
L.
,
Wang
,
B.
,
Li
,
S.
,
Wang
,
J.
,
Lund
,
P.
, and
Lipiński
,
W.
,
2021
, “
Thermodynamic Analysis of a Conceptual Fixed-Bed Solar Thermochemical Cavity Receiver–Reactor Array for Water Splitting Via Ceria Redox Cycling
,”
Front. Energy Res.
,
9
(
253
), p.
565761
.
46.
Li
,
S.
,
Wheeler
,
V. M.
,
Kreider
,
P. B.
,
Bader
,
R.
, and
Lipiński
,
W.
,
2018
, “
Thermodynamic Analyses of Fuel Production Via Solar-Driven Non-Stoichiometric Metal Oxide Redox Cycling. Part 2. Impact of Solid–Gas Flow Configurations and Active Material Composition on System-Level Efficiency
,”
Energy Fuels
,
32
(
10
), pp.
10848
10863
.
47.
Mogensen
,
M.
,
Sammes
,
N. M.
, and
Tompsett
,
G. A.
,
2000
, “
Physical, Chemical and Electrochemical Properties of Pure and Doped Ceria
,”
Solid State Ionics
,
129
(
1–4
), pp.
63
94
.
48.
Goldberg
,
D. E.
, and
Holland
,
J. H.
,
1988
, “
Genetic Algorithms and Machine Learning
,”
Mach. Learn.
,
3
(
2/3
), pp.
95
99
.
49.
The MathWorks, Inc.
,
2017b
,
MATLAB and Statistics Toolbox Release
,
The MathWorks, Inc.
,
Natick, MA
.
50.
Venstrom
,
L. J.
,
De Smith
,
R. M.
,
Bala Chandran
,
R.
,
Boman
,
D. B.
,
Krenzke
,
P. T.
, and
Davidson
,
J. H.
,
2015
, “
Applicability of an Equilibrium Model to Predict the Conversion of CO2 to CO Via the Reduction and Oxidation of a Fixed Bed of Cerium Dioxide
,”
Energy Fuels
,
29
(
12
), pp.
8168
8177
.