In general, architectural design is a loosely structured, open-ended activity that includes problem definition, representation, performance evaluation, and decision making. A number of approaches have been proposed in the literature to organize, guide, and facilitate the design process. The main objective of this paper is to seek a logical and rigorous means to aid in developing an optimized design that is acceptable to the customer or user of the product. The convention design approaches heavily involve decision making, which is integral to the architectural design process and is an important element in nearly all phases of design. There is a need to reframe the decision-making process to transform and improve the design process in order for finial building to achieve the performance goals. The first step in making an effective design decision is to understand the stakeholders' and team players' (architect, engineer, client, and consultant) different preferences based on their needs, experiences, and expectations of the project. In this paper, we first provide an overview about conventional decision-making method and process, identify the existing attributes that contribute to decision making in design, and outline the obstacles present in making optimized sustainable design decisions due to the uncertainty of different stakeholders' preferences. Then, we present one case study to identify and compare different preferences among engineering students, practicing architects, and the general public, and we analyze how the three groups attribute different weight to the major design attributes. This paper provides some novel insights into a value-driven sustainable design process, and it will be one of the building blocks for creating a framework to integrate game theory into the design decision-making process, considering multiple stakeholders' perspectives and preferences for building attributes as future research tasks.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
April 2017
Research-Article
Value-Driven Design Process: A Systematic Decision-Making Framework Considering Different Attribute Preferences From Multiple Stakeholders
Jun Zhuang,
Jun Zhuang
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering,
University at Buffalo,
317 Bell Hall,
Buffalo, NY 14260-2050
e-mail: jzhuang@buffalo.edu
University at Buffalo,
317 Bell Hall,
Buffalo, NY 14260-2050
e-mail: jzhuang@buffalo.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Ming Hu,
Ming Hu
School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation,
University of Maryland,
ARC 1207,
3835 Campus Drive,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: mhu2008@umd.edu
University of Maryland,
ARC 1207,
3835 Campus Drive,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: mhu2008@umd.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Fatemeh Mousapour
Fatemeh Mousapour
Industrial and Systems Engineering,
University at Buffalo,
339A Bell Hall,
Buffalo, NY 14260-2050
e-mail: fmousapo@buffalo.edu
University at Buffalo,
339A Bell Hall,
Buffalo, NY 14260-2050
e-mail: fmousapo@buffalo.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Jun Zhuang
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering,
University at Buffalo,
317 Bell Hall,
Buffalo, NY 14260-2050
e-mail: jzhuang@buffalo.edu
University at Buffalo,
317 Bell Hall,
Buffalo, NY 14260-2050
e-mail: jzhuang@buffalo.edu
Ming Hu
School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation,
University of Maryland,
ARC 1207,
3835 Campus Drive,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: mhu2008@umd.edu
University of Maryland,
ARC 1207,
3835 Campus Drive,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: mhu2008@umd.edu
Fatemeh Mousapour
Industrial and Systems Engineering,
University at Buffalo,
339A Bell Hall,
Buffalo, NY 14260-2050
e-mail: fmousapo@buffalo.edu
University at Buffalo,
339A Bell Hall,
Buffalo, NY 14260-2050
e-mail: fmousapo@buffalo.edu
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Solar Energy Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING: INCLUDING WIND ENERGY AND BUILDING ENERGY CONSERVATION. Manuscript received April 30, 2016; final manuscript received October 17, 2016; published online November 2, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Patrick E. Phelan.
J. Sol. Energy Eng. Apr 2017, 139(2): 021001 (6 pages)
Published Online: November 2, 2016
Article history
Received:
April 30, 2016
Revised:
October 17, 2016
Citation
Zhuang, J., Hu, M., and Mousapour, F. (November 2, 2016). "Value-Driven Design Process: A Systematic Decision-Making Framework Considering Different Attribute Preferences From Multiple Stakeholders." ASME. J. Sol. Energy Eng. April 2017; 139(2): 021001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4035059
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Related Articles
A Set of Estimation and Decision Preference Experiments for Exploring Risk Assessment Biases in Engineering Students
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (March,2023)
Evaluating Supplier Performance Using DEA and Piecewise Triangular Fuzzy AHP
J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng (September,2008)
A Formal Approach to Handling Conflicts in Multiattribute Group Decision Making
J. Mech. Des (July,2006)
On Rationality in Engineering Design
J. Mech. Des (November,2004)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Introduction
Managing Risks in Design & Construction Projects
Utility Function Fundamentals
Decision Making in Engineering Design
Research on Production-Distribution Collaborative Planning for Distributed Decision Environment
International Conference on Measurement and Control Engineering 2nd (ICMCE 2011)