Better energy performance (i.e., net-zero or carbon neutral) is not the only dimension where better buildings quality is needed. It may just be the easiest one to measure. Three interrelated dimensions—productivity and its cousins, health and comfort—are the next in line. The building of the future will bring far more intelligence—and quality—to those dimensions, in order to compete for occupants and potentially to help to pay for the efficiency needed on the energy side. The economics of productivity and health gains or losses can dwarf—in upside or downside—what happens on the energy front. This paper describes specific drivers of health and productivity and comfort, and discusses their use in the design and occupancy of Rocky Mountain Institute’s (RMI’s) new net-zero building in Colorado as a test case to look at design and occupant engagement issues. The paper details the most important design and behavior tradeoffs encountered, and discusses paths to effectively resolving them and accelerating change.

References

References
1.
Langdon
,
D.
,
2007
, “
Cost of Green Revisited: Reexamining the Feasibility and Cost Impact of Sustainable Design in the Light of Increased Market Adoption
,” (
AECOM
), Chicago, IL, pp.
3
25
.
2.
NBI
,
2015
, “
Zero Net Energy Buildings Database
,” New Buildings Institute, Portland, OR.
3.
IAQ-SFRB
,
2016
, “
Cost Effectiveness of Improving Indoor Environments to Increase Productivity
,” Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Indoor Air Quality Scientific Findings Resource Bank, Berkeley, CA, https://iaqscience.lbl.gov/performance-cost
4.
Hill
,
C.
,
2014
, “
Unsuitable Office Temperatures Cost Time and Productivity
,”
Facil. Manage. J.
, epub.
5.
Mendell
,
M. J.
, and
Mirer
,
A.
,
2008
, “
Indoor Thermal Factors and Symptoms in Office Workers: Findings From the U.S. EPA BASE Study
,”
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory
, Berkeley, CA, Report No. LBNL-2083E.
6.
Fisk
,
W. J.
,
Black
,
D.
, and
Brunner
,
G.
,
2011
, “
Benefits and Costs of Improved IEQ in U.S. Offices
,”
Indoor Air J.
,
21
(
5
), pp. 357–367.
7.
ILFI
,
2014
, “
Living Building Challenge 3.0
,”
International Living Future Institute
, Seattle, WA.
8.
Roberts
,
J. E.
,
2005
, “
Update on the Positive Effects of Light on Humans
,”
Photochem. Photobiol.
,
81
(
3
), pp.
490
492
.
9.
Hoyt
,
T.
,
Schiavon
,
S.
,
Piccioli
,
A.
,
Moon
,
D.
, and
Steinfeld
,
K.
,
2013
, “
CBE Thermal Comfort Tool
,” Center for the Built Environment, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, http://cbe.berkeley.edu/comforttool/
10.
de Dear
,
R.
,
Brager
,
G.
, and
Cooper
,
C.
,
1997
, “
Developing an Adaptive Model of Thermal Comfort and Preference
,”
ASHRAE
, Atlanta, GA, Final Report RP-884.
11.
Arens
,
E.
,
2013
, “
Making Personal Comfort the Basis for Efficient Buildings
,” ARPA-E Workshop,
U.S. Department of Energy
, Washington, DC.
12.
Salingaros
,
N. A.
,
2015
, “
Biophilia and Healing Environments: Healthy Principles for Designing the Built World
,” Terrapin Bright Green, New York.
13.
Browning
,
W. D.
,
Ryan
,
C. O.
, and
Clancy
,
J. O.
,
2014
, “
14 Patterns of Biophilic Design
,” Terrapin Bright Green, New York.
14.
Bendewald
,
M.
,
Miller
,
D.
, and
Muldavin
,
S.
,
2015
, “
How to Calculate and Present Deep Retrofit Value: A Guide for Investors
,” Rocky Mountain Institute, Boulder, CO.
15.
Bendewald
,
M.
,
Hutchinson
,
H.
,
Muldavin
,
S.
, and
Torbert
,
R.
,
2014
, “
How to Calculate and Present Deep Retrofit Value: A Guide for Owner-Occupants
,” Rocky Mountain Institute, Boulder, CO.
16.
Delos
,
2015
, “
The WELL Building Standard v1
,” International Well Buildings Institute, Delos Living LLC, New York, Delos.com
17.
RMI
,
2016
, “
Rocky Mountain Institute Innovation Center Website
,” Rocky Mountain Institute, Basalt, CO, http://www.rmi.org/innovationcenter
18.
Meek
,
C.
, and
Van Den Wymelenberg
,
K.
,
2015
,
Daylighting and Integrated Lighting
,
Routledge Press
,
Oxon, UK
.
19.
DOE
,
2014
, “
True Colors—LEDs and the Relationship Between CCT, CRI, Optical Safety, Material Degradation, and Photobiological Stimulation
,”
U.S. Department of Energy
, Washington, DC, Technical Brief, Report No. PNNL-23622.
20.
ASHRAE
,
2013
, “
Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy (ANSI Approved) and User’s Manual Set
,” ASHRAE, Atlanta, GA, Standard No. ASHRAE 55-2013.
21.
McClurg
,
C.
,
2016
, “
Redefining and Delivering Thermal Comfort in Buildings Insight Brief
,”
Rocky Mountain Institute
, Boulder, CO.
22.
Browning
,
W. D.
,
Ryan
,
C. O.
, and
Clancy
,
J. O.
,
2016
, “
Biophilic Design Case Studies
,” Terrapin Bright Green, New York, http://www.terrapinbrightgreen.com/report/biophilic-design-case-studies/
23.
Hutchinson
,
R.
,
Carmichael
,
C.
,
Berg
,
K.
, and
Tilbury
,
M.
,
2016
, “
How to Buy a Net-Zero Office
,”
ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings
, ACEEE, Pacific Grove, CA, Dec. 4–6, Paper No. 10-472.
24.
Sakellaris
,
I. A.
,
Sarage
,
D. E.
,
Mandin
,
C.
,
Roda
,
C.
,
Fossati
,
S.
,
de Kluizenaar
,
Y.
,
Carrer
,
P.
,
Dimitroulopoulou
,
S.
,
Mihucz
,
V. G.
,
Szigeti
,
T.
,
Hanninen
,
O.
,
de Oliveira Fernandes
,
E.
,
Bartzis
,
J. G.
, and
Bluyssen
,
P. M.
,
2016
, “
Perceived Indoor Environmental and Occupants’ Comfort in European ‘Modern’ Office Buildings: The OFFICEAIR Study
,”
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health
,
13
(
5
), p.
444
.
25.
Kingma
,
B.
, and
van Marken Lichtenbelt
,
W.
,
2015
, “
Energy Consumption in Buildings and Female Thermal Demand
,”
Nat. Clim. Change Lett.
,
5
(
12
), pp.
1054
1056
.
26.
BMW Research and Engineering
,
2012
, private communication.
27.
Van der Valk
,
S.
,
Myers
,
T.
,
Atkinson
,
I.
, and
Mohring
,
K.
,
2015
, “
Sensor Networks in Workplaces: Correlating Comfort and Productivity
,”
IEEE Tenth International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing
(
ISSNIP
), Singapore, Apr. 7–9, Paper No. 15142019.
You do not currently have access to this content.