Previous research has shown that as wind turbine rotor designs increase in diameter they approach flutter instabilities. Recent blade designs incorporate blade sweep to lower fatigue loads and increase rotor diameter for more energy production; however, the flutter margin may be reduced with sweep. In this work, flutter speeds are predicted and compared for turbines with straight and swept blades. For this study, a wind turbine analysis tool specifically developed for blade sweep (CurveFAST) was used, in addition to a tool developed for helicopter analysis: rotorcraft comprehensive analysis system (RCAS). The results showed that CurveFAST generally predicted a higher flutter speed and RCAS predicted a lower flutter speed compared to previous research. The difference may be attributed to the unsteady aerodynamics modeling. The results for an extended radius and swept 5 MW turbine showed that the flutter speed was most sensitive to the position of the blade center of mass axis. Using the selected design parameters, it was not possible to design a swept 5 MW blade with adequate flutter margin that would produce 5% more energy with the same loads as a baseline straight rotor. Further study of swept blades is required to determine if there is a size limit above which flutter cannot be avoided.

References

References
1.
Larwood
,
S.
,
Sencenbaugh
,
J.
, and
Acker
,
B.
,
2001
,
Controlled Velocity Testing of an 8-kW Wind Turbine
, WINDPOWER 2001,
American Wind Energy Association
,
Washington, DC
.
2.
Eggleston
,
D. M.
, and
Stoddard
,
F. S.
,
1987
,
Wind Turbine Engineering Design
,
Van Nostrand Reinhold
,
New York
.
3.
Nitzsche
,
F.
,
1994
, “
Dynamic Aeroelastic Stability of Vertical-Axis Wind Turbines Under Constant Wind Velocity
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
10
(
3
), pp.
348
355
.
4.
Loewy
,
R. G.
,
1969
, “
Review of Rotary-Wing V/STOL Dynamic and Aeroelastic Problems
,”
J. Am. Helicopter Soc.
,
14
(
3
), pp.
3
23
.
5.
Hansen
,
M. H.
,
2007
, “
Aeroelastic Instability Problems for Wind Turbines
,”
Wind Energy
,
10
(
6
), pp.
551
577
.
6.
Holierhoek
,
J. G.
,
2013
, “
An Overview of Possible Aeroelastic Instabilities for Wind Turbine Blades
,”
Wind Eng.
,
37
(
4
), pp.
421
440
.
7.
Lobitz
,
D. W.
,
2004
, “
Aeroelastic Stability Predictions for a MW-Sized Blade
,”
Wind Energy
,
7
(
3
), pp.
211
224
.
8.
Lobitz
,
D. W.
,
2005
, “
Parameter Sensitivities Affecting the Flutter Speed of a MW-Sized Blade
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
127
(
4
), pp.
538
543
.
9.
Griffith
,
D.
, and
Ashwill
,
T.
,
2011
, “
The Sandia 100-Meter All-Glass Baseline Wind Turbine Blade: SNL100-00
,”
Sandia National Laboratories
, Albuquerque, NM, Report No. SAND2011-3779.
10.
Owens
,
B. C.
,
Griffith
,
D. T.
,
Resor
,
B. R.
, and
Hurtado
,
J. E.
,
2013
, “
Impact of Modeling Approach on Flutter Predictions for Very Large Wind Turbine Blade Designs
,”
American Helicopter Society 69th Annual Forum
, Phoenix, AZ, May 21–23.
11.
Hansen
,
M. H.
,
2011
, “
Aeroelastic Properties of Backward Swept Blades
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2011-260.
12.
Hansen
,
M. H.
,
2004
, “
Stability Analysis of Three-Bladed Turbines Using and Eigenvalue Approach
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2004-505.
13.
Liebst
,
B. S.
,
1986
, “
Wind Turbine Gust Load Alleviation Utilizing Curved Blades
,”
J. Propul.
,
2
(
4
), pp.
371
377
.
14.
Zuteck
,
M.
,
2002
, “
Adaptive Blade Concept Assessment: Curved Platform Induced Twist Investigation
,”
Sandia National Laboratories
, Albuquerque, NM, Report No. SAND2002-2996.
15.
Ashwill
,
T. D.
,
Kanaby
,
G.
,
Jackson
,
K.
, and
Zuteck
,
M.
,
2010
, “
Development of the Swept Twist Adaptive Rotor (STAR) Blade
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2010-1582.
16.
Jonkman
,
J. M.
,
Butterfield
,
C. P.
,
Musial
,
W. D.
, and
Scott
,
G. N.
,
2009
, “
Definition of a 5-MW Reference Turbine for Offshore System Development
,”
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
, Golden, CO, Report No. NREL/TP-500-38060.
17.
Larwood
,
S.
,
van Dam
,
C. P.
, and
Schow
,
D.
,
2014
, “
Design Studies of Swept Wind Turbine Blades
,”
Renewable Energy
,
71
, pp.
563
571
.
18.
Malcolm
,
D. J.
, and
Hansen
,
A. C.
,
2006
, “
WindPACT Turbine Rotor Design Study June 2000–June 2002
,”
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
, Golden, CO, Report No. NREL/SR-500-32495.
19.
Bir
,
G.
,
2005
, “
Structural Dynamics Verification of Rotorcraft Comprehensive Analysis System (RCAS)
,”
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
, Golden, CO, Report No. NREL/TP-500-35328.
20.
Hopkins
,
A. S.
, and
Ormiston
,
R. A.
,
2006
, “
An Examination of Selected Problems in Rotor Blade Structural Mechanics and Dynamics
,”
J. Am. Helicopter Soc.
,
51
(
1
), pp.
104
119
.
21.
Hodges
,
D. H.
, and
Dowell
,
E. H.
,
1974
, “
Nonlinear Equations of Motion for the Elastic Bending and Torsion of Twisted Nonuniform Rotor Blades
,” NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA,
NASA
Technical Report No. D-7818.
22.
U.S. Army Research, Development, and Engineering Command
,
2013
, “
RCAS Users Manual
,” U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command, Moffett Field, CA, USAAMCOM/AFDD Technical Report No. 02-A-006.
23.
U.S. Army Research, Development, and Engineering Command
,
2013
, “
RCAS Theory Manual
,” U.S. Army Research, Development, and Engineering Command, U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command, Moffett Field, CA, USAAMCOM/AFDD Technical Report No. 02-A-005.
24.
Larwood
,
S.
, and
van Dam
,
C. P.
,
2013
, “
Dynamic Analysis Tool Development for Swept Wind Turbine Blades
,”
Wind Energy
,
16
(
6
), pp.
879
907
.
25.
Jonkman
,
J. M.
,
2005
, “
NWTC Design Codes (FAST Version 6.00)
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, accessed July 5, 2005, http://wind.nrel.gov/designcodes/simulators/FAST/
26.
Moriarty
,
P. J.
, and
Hansen
,
A. C.
,
2005
, “
AeroDyn Theory Manual
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, Report No. NREL/EL-500-36881.
27.
Kelley
,
N. D.
, and
Jonkman
,
B. J.
,
2013
, “
NWTC Computer-Aided Engineering Tools (TurbSim by Neil Kelley, Bonnie Jonkman)
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, accessed May 30, 2013, http://wind.nrel.gov/designcodes/preprocessors/turbsim/
You do not currently have access to this content.