This paper proposes a novel prediction model for photovoltaic (PV) system output current. The proposed model is based on cascade-forward back propagation artificial neural network (CFNN) with two inputs and one output. The inputs are solar radiation and ambient temperature, while the output is output current. Two years of experimental data for a 1.4 kWp PV system are utilized in this research. The monitored performance is recorded every 2 s in order to consider the uncertainty of the system’s output current. A comparison between the proposed model and other empirical and statistical models is done in this paper as well. Moreover, the ability of the proposed model to predict performance with high uncertainty rate is validated. Three statistical values are used to evaluate the accuracy of the proposed model, namely, mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), mean bias error (MBE), and root mean square error (RMSE). These values are used to measure the deviation between the actual and the predicted data in order to judge the accuracy of the proposed model. A simple estimation of the deviation between the measured value and the predicted value with respect to the measured value is first given by MAPE. After that, the average deviation of the predicted values from measured data is estimated by MBE in order to indicate the amount of the overestimation/underestimation in the predicted values. Third, the ability of predicting future records is validated by RMSE, which represents the variation of the predicted data around the measured data. Eventually, the percentage of MBE and RMSE is calculated with respect to the average value of the output current so as to present better understating of model’s accuracy. The results show that the MAPE, MBE, and RMSE of the proposed model are 7.08%, −0.21 A (−4.98%), and 0.315 A (7.5%), respectively. In addition to that, the proposed model exceeds the other models in terms of prediction accuracy.

References

References
1.
Li
,
Y.
,
Su
,
Y.
, and
Shu
,
L.
,
2014
, “
An ARMAX Model for Forecasting the Power Output of a Grid Connected Photovoltaic System
,”
Renewable Energy
,
66
, pp.
78
89
.10.1016/j.renene.2013.11.067
2.
Woyte
,
A.
,
Van Thong
,
V.
,
Belmans
,
R.
, and
Nijs
,
J.
,
2006
, “
Voltage Fluctuations on Distribution Level Introduced by Photovoltaic Systems
,”
IEEE Trans. Energy Conv.
,
21
(
1
), pp.
202
209
.10.1109/TEC.2005.845454
3.
Mohammed
,
A.
,
Pasupuleti
,
J.
,
Khatib
,
T.
, and
Elmenreich
,
W.
,
2015
, “
A Review of Process and Operational System Control of Hybrid Photovoltaic/Diesel Generator Systems
,”
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
,
44
, pp.
436
446
.10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.035
4.
Dalton
,
G.
,
Lockington
,
D.
, and
Baldock
,
T.
,
2009
, “
Feasibility Analysis of Renewable Energy Supply Options for a Grid-Connected Large Hotel
,”
Renewable Energy
,
34
(
4
), pp.
955
964
.10.1016/j.renene.2008.08.012
5.
Khatib
,
T.
,
Mohamed
,
A.
, and
Sopian
,
K.
,
2012
, “
A Software Tool for Optimal Sizing of PV Systems in Malaysia
,”
Model. Simul. Eng.
,
2012
, p.
969248
.
6.
Picault
,
D.
,
Raison
,
B.
,
Bacha
,
S.
,
De La Casa
,
J.
, and
Aguilera
,
J.
,
2010
, “
Forecasting Photovoltaic Array Power Production Subject to Mismatch Losses
,”
Sol. Energy
,
84
(
7
), pp.
1301
1309
.10.1016/j.solener.2010.04.009
7.
Su
,
Y.
,
Chan
,
L.-C.
,
Shu
,
L.
, and
Tsui
,
K.-L.
,
2012
, “
Real-Time Prediction Models for Output Power and Efficiency of Grid-Connected Solar Photovoltaic Systems
,”
Appl. Energy
,
93
, pp.
319
326
.10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.12.052
8.
Sulaiman
,
S. I.
,
Rahman
,
T. K. A.
,
Musirin
,
I.
, and
Shaari
,
S.
,
2012
, “
An Artificial Immune-Based Hybrid Multi-Layer Feedforward Neural Network for Predicting Grid-Connected Photovoltaic System Output
,”
Energy Procedia
,
14
, pp.
260
264
.10.1016/j.egypro.2011.12.927
9.
Mellit
,
A.
, and
Kalogirou
,
S. A.
,
2011
, “
ANFIS-Based Modelling for Photovoltaic Power Supply System: A Case Study
,”
Renewable Energy
,
36
(
1
), pp.
250
258
.10.1016/j.renene.2010.06.028
10.
Wong
,
S.
,
Wan
,
K. K.
, and
Lam
,
T. N.
,
2010
, “
Artificial Neural Networks for Energy Analysis of Office Buildings With Daylighting
,”
Appl. Energy
,
87
(
2
), pp.
551
557
.10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.06.028
11.
Kazem
,
H. A.
,
Khatib
,
T.
, and
Alwaeli
,
A. A.
,
2013
, “
Optimization of Photovoltaic Modules Tilt Angle for Oman
,”
7th International Power Engineering and Optimization Conference (PEOCO)
, pp.
703
707
.
12.
Khatib
,
T.
, and
Elmenreich
,
W.
,
2014
, “
Novel Simplified Hourly Energy Flow Models for Photovoltaic Power Systems
,”
Energy Conv. Manage.
,
79
, pp.
441
448
.10.1016/j.enconman.2013.12.038
13.
Khatib
,
T.
,
Mohamed
,
A.
,
Sopian
,
K.
, and
Mahmoud
,
M.
,
2012
, “
Assessment of Artificial Neural Networks for Hourly Solar Radiation Prediction
,”
Int. J. Photoenergy
,
2012
, p.
946890
.
14.
Geman
,
S.
,
Bienenstock
,
E.
, and
Doursat
,
R.
,
1992
, “
Neural Networks and the Bias/Variance Dilemma
,”
Neural Comput.
,
4
(
1
), pp.
1
58
.10.1162/neco.1992.4.1.1
15.
Blum
,
A.
,
1992
,
Neural Networks in C++: An Object-Oriented Framework for Building Connectionist Systems
,
Wiley
, New York.
16.
Swingler
,
K.
,
1996
,
Applying Neural Networks: A Practical Guide
,
Morgan Kaufmann
, New York.
17.
Berry
,
M. J.
, and
Linoff
,
G.
,
1997
,
Data Mining Techniques: for Marketing, Sales, and Customer Support
,
Wiley
, New York.
18.
Boger
,
Z.
, and
Guterman
,
H.
,
1997
, “
Knowledge Extraction From Artificial Neural Network Models
,”
1997 IEEE International Conference on Systems
,
Man, and Cybernetics
, pp.
3030
3035
.
19.
Caudill
,
M.
, and
Butler
,
C.
,
1994
,
Understanding Neural Networks: Computer Explorations: A Workbook in Two Volumes With Software for the Macintosh and PC Compatibles,
MIT Press,
Cambridge, MA.
You do not currently have access to this content.