The aim of designing wind turbine blades is to improve the power capture ability. Since rotor control technology is currently limited to controlling rotational speed and blade pitch, an increasing concern has been given to morphing blades. In this paper, a simplified morphing blade is introduced, which has a linear twist distribution along the span and a shape that can be controlled by adjusting the twist of the blade's root and tip. To evaluate the performance of wind turbine blades, a numerical code based on the blade element momentum theory is developed and validated. The blade of the NREL Phase VI wind turbine is taken as a reference blade and has a fixed pitch. The optimization problems associated with the control of the morphing blade and a blade with pitch control are formulated. The optimal results show that the morphing blade gives better results than the blade with pitch control in terms of produced power. Under the assumption that at a given site, the annual average wind speed is known and the wind speed follows a Rayleigh distribution, the annual energy production of wind turbines was evaluated for three types of blade, namely, morphing blade, blade with pitch control and fixed pitch blade. For an annual average wind speed varying between 5 m/s and 15 m/s, it turns out that the annual energy production of the wind turbine containing morphing blades is 24.5% to 69.7% higher than the annual energy production of the wind turbine containing pitch fixed blades. Likewise, the annual energy production of the wind turbine containing blades with pitch control is 22.7% to 66.9% higher than the annual energy production of the wind turbine containing pitch fixed blades.

References

References
1.
Lobitz
,
D.
,
Veers
,
P.
, and
Migliore
,
P. G.
,
1996
, “
Enhanced Performance of HAWTs Using Adaptive Blades
,”
15th ASME Wind Energy Symposium
, Houston, TX, January 28-February 2, pp.
41
45
.
2.
Beyene
,
A.
, and
Peffley
,
J.
,
2007
, “
A Morphing Blade for Wave and Wind Energy Conversion
,”
OCEANS 2007—Europe
, Aberdeen, UK, June 18–24, pp.
1
6
.10.1109/OCEANSE.2007.4302482
3.
Daynes
,
S.
, and
Weaver
,
P. M.
,
2011
, “
A Morphing Wind Turbine Blade Control Surface
,”
ASME 2011 Conference on Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems, Scottsdale, AZ, September 18–21
,
ASME
Paper No. SMASIS2011-4961, pp.
531
541
.10.1115/SMASIS2011-4961
4.
Barlas
,
T.
,
2010
, “
Review of State of the Art in Smart Rotor Control Research for Wind Turbines
,”
Prog. Aerospace Sci.
,
46
(
1
), pp.
1
27
.10.1016/j.paerosci.2009.08.002
5.
Duran
,
S.
,
2005
, “
Computer Aided Design of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Blades
,” Master's thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
6.
Lanzafame
,
R.
,
2007
, “
Fluid Dynamics Wind Turbine Design: Critical Analysis, Optimization and Application of BEM Theory
,”
Renewable Energy
,
32
(
14
), pp.
2291
2305
.10.1016/j.renene.2006.12.010
7.
Kulunk
,
E.
, and
Yilmaz
,
N.
,
2009
, “
HAWT Rotor Design and Performance Analysis
,”
ASME 3rd International Conference on Energy Sustainability, San Francisco, CA, July 19–23
,
ASME
Paper No. ES2009-90441, pp.
1019
1029
.10.1115/ES2009-90441
8.
Tenguria
,
N.
,
Mittal
,
N. D.
, and
Ahmed
,
S.
,
2010
, “
Investigation of Blade Performance of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Based on Blade Element Momentum Theory (BEMT) Using NACA Airfoils
,”
Int. J. Comput. Eng. Sci.
,
2
(
12
), pp.
25
35
, available at: http://www.ajol.info/index.php/ijest/article/view/64565/52346
9.
Dai
,
J.
,
Hu
,
Y.
,
Liu
,
D.
, and
Long
,
X.
,
2011
, “
Aerodynamic Loads Calculation and Analysis for Large Scale Wind Turbine Based on Combining BEM Modified Theory With Dynamic Stall Model
,”
Renewable Energy
,
36
(
3
), pp.
1095
1104
.10.1016/j.renene.2010.08.024
10.
Hand
,
M. M.
,
Simms
,
D. A.
,
Fingersh
,
L.
,
Jager
,
D.
,
Cotrell
,
J.
,
Schreck
,
S.
, and
Larwood
,
S.
,
2001
, “
Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment Phase V: Test Configuration and Available Data Campaigns
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, Technical Report NREL/TP-500-29491.
11.
Lanzafame
,
R.
, and
Messina
,
M.
,
2010
, “
Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Working at Maximum Power Coefficient Continuously
,”
Renewable Energy
,
35
(
1
), pp.
301
306
.10.1016/j.renene.2009.06.020
12.
Manwell
,
J. F.
,
McGowan
,
J.
, and
Rogers
,
A.
,
2002
, “
Wind Energy Explained Theory, Design and Application
,”
Wind Energy Explained Theory, Design and Application Explained Theory, Design and Application
,
Wiley-Blackwell
, Chickester, UK, pp.
83
139
.
13.
Buhl
,
M. L.
,
2005
, “
A New Empirical Relationship Between Thrust Coefficient and Induction Factor for the Turbulent Windmill State
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, Technical Report NREL/TP-500-36834.
14.
Lanzafame
,
R.
, and
Messina
,
M.
,
2009
, “
Design and Performance of a Double-Pitch Wind Turbine With Non-Twisted Blades
,”
Renewable Energy
,
34
(
5
), pp.
1413
1420
.10.1016/j.renene.2008.09.004
15.
Ramsay
,
R. R.
,
Hoffmann
,
M.
, and
Gregorek
,
G.
,
1999
, “
Effects of Grit Roughness and Pitch Oscillations on the S809 Airfoil: Airfoil Performance Report, Revised (12/99)
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, Technical Report NREL/TP-442-7817.
16.
Ramsay
,
R.
,
Janiszewska
,
J.
, and
Gregorek
,
G.
,
1996
, “
Wind Tunnel Testing of Three S809 Aileron Configurations for Use on Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, Airfoil Performance Report July 1996.
17.
Merabet
,
A.
,
Thongam
,
J.
, and
Gu
,
J.
,
2011
, “
Torque and Pitch Angle Control for Variable Speed Wind Turbines in All Operating Regimes
10th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering
(
EEEIC
), Rome, May 8–11.10.1109/EEEIC.2011.5874598
18.
da Rosa
,
A. V.
,
2009
,
Fundamentals of Renewable Energy Processes
,
Academic Press
,
Waltham, MA
, pp.
723
797
.
You do not currently have access to this content.