Buildings account for nearly 40% of the end-use energy consumption and carbon emissions globally. These buildings, once built, are bound to be utilized for several decades if not longer. The building sector, therefore, holds a significant responsibility for implementing strategies to increase energy efficiency and reduce carbon emissions and thus contribute to global efforts directed toward mitigating the adverse effects of climate change. This paper presents an overview of the effect of building orientation on energy consumption in buildings for the extreme cold weather conditions in Astana (capital of the Republic of Kazakhstan), with temperature ranging between −35 and +40 °C. Passive design features coupled with integration of renewable energy technologies have been identified for the next generation of buildings in Astana. The specific nature of the work is intentional; it is a continuing attempt to generate relevant know how that has direct relevancy to Astana's system approach to energy conservation to meet its extreme winters. Simulations allowed assessing how changing certain input variables can impact the overall energy consumption of the considered object. The simulation results have shown that orientation of a building can significantly affect the energy usage rate. In fact, the building rotation has justified the initial assumptions that building orientation affects its energy consumption. The South and North facing directions are found to be the most energy efficient (initial orientation is 35 degrees toward the North-East). These findings have been confirmed by the separate calculations based on the local and international standards and codes. Keywords: energy, low energy design, passive solar heating and cooling, extreme weather conditions and energy consumption.

References

1.
RRCAP
,
2007
, “
Industrial Pollution
”, Part 2, p.
71
, http://www.rrcap.unep.org/reports/soe/sa_part2_3.pdf
2.
DCLG
,
2007
, “
Building a Greener Future: Policy Statement
,” Department for Communities and Local Government. The Stationery Office, London.
3.
BBC
,
2010
, “
Kazakhstan. Country Profile
,” http://news.bbc.co.uk/
4.
UN
,
2008
, “
Environmental Performance Reviews. Kazakhstan
,” Second Review, http://www.unece.org/
5.
Indexmundi
,
2011
, “
Oil Production. Country Comparison
,” http://www.indexmundi.com/g/r.aspx?t=0&v=97&l=en
6.
PMR Publications
,
2008
, “
Global Liquidity Crisis Hits the Kazakh Construction Industry
,” http://www.pmrpublications.com/
7.
Today.kz
,
2012
, “
Housing Deficit in Kazakhstan Reaches 100 Million Square Meters
,” http://www.today.kz/ru/news/finance/2010-06-25/23580
8.
Yearbook
,
2007
, “
Summary Statistical Yearbook of Kazakhstan
,” http://www.yearbook.com
9.
Kazrealty
,
2012
, “
Market
,” http://www.kazrealty.kz/ru/market/
10.
PMR Publications
,
2007
, “
Value and Real Growth Rate of Construction Output in Kazakhstan
,” http://www.pmrpublications.com/
11.
Pacheco
Ordóñez, J., and Martínez, G.,
2012
,
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
,
16
(
6
), pp.
3559
3573
.10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.045
12.
Feng
,
Y.
,
2004
, “
Thermal Design Standards for Energy Efficiency of Residential Buildings in Hot Summer/Cold Winter Zones
,”
Energy Build.
,
36
, pp.
1309
1312
.10.1016/j.enbuild.2003.08.003
13.
Aksoy
,
U. T.
, and
Inalli
,
M.
,
2006
, “
Impacts of Some Building Passive Design Parameters on Heating Demand for a Cold Region
,”
Build. Environ.
,
41
, pp.
1742
1754
.10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.07.011
14.
Szokolay
,
2008
,
Introduction to Architectural Science: The Basis of Sustainable Design
,
Architectural Press
,
Oxford, UK
.
15.
Morrissey
,
J.
,
Moore
,
T.
, and
Horne
,
R. E.
,
2011
, “
Affordable Passive Solar Design in a Temperate Climate: An Experiment in Residential Building Orientation
,”
Renew. Energy
,
36
, pp.
568
577
.10.1016/j.renene.2010.08.013
16.
Gupta
,
R.
, and
Ralegaonkar
,
R. V.
,
2004
, “
Estimation of Beam Radiation for Optimal Orientation and Shape Decision of Buildings in India
,”
Arch. J. Inst. Eng. India
85
, pp.
27
32
.
17.
Florides
,
G. A.
,
Tassou
,
S. A.
,
Kalogirou
,
S. A.
, and
Wrobel
,
L. C.
,
2002
, “
Measures Used to Lower Building Energy Consumption and Their Cost Effectiveness
,”
Appl. Energy
,
73
, pp.
299
328
.10.1016/S0306-2619(02)00119-8
18.
Manio
˘glu
,
G.
, and
Yilmaz
,
Z.
,
2006
, “
Economic Evaluation of the Building Envelope and Operation Period of Heating System in Terms of Thermal Comfort
,”
Energy Build.
,
38
, pp.
266
272
.10.1016/j.enbuild.2005.06.009
19.
Radhi
,
H.
,
2008
, “
A Systematic Methodology for Optimising the Energy Performance of Buildings in Bahrain
,”
Energy Build.
,
40
, pp.
1297
1303
.10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.11.007
20.
Mingfang
,
T.
,
2002
, “
Solar Control for Buildings
,”
Build. Environ.
,
37
, pp.
659
664
.10.1016/S0360-1323(01)00063-4
21.
Tzempelikos
,
A.
, and
Athienitis
,
A. K.
,
2007
, “
The Impact of Shading Design and Control on Building Cooling and Lighting Demand
,”
Sol. Energy
,
81
, pp.
369
382
.10.1016/j.solener.2006.06.015
22.
Jinghua
,
Y.
,
Changzhi
,
Y.
, and
Liwei
,
T.
,
2008
, “
Low-Energy Envelope Design of Residential Building in Hot Summer and Cold Winter Zone in China
,”
Energy Build.
,
40
, pp.
1536
1546
.10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.02.020
23.
Design Builder
,
2012
, http://www.designbuilder.co.uk
24.
Profinance.kz
,
2011
, “
New Construction Projects are Expected in 2011
,” http://profinance.kz/news/articles/24724-novye-proekty-po-seme-dolevogo-stroitelstva.html
26.
Construction Climatology, 2011, “Construction Norms and Regulations of Kazakhstan (CNRK) 2.04-01-2010,” (СНиПРК 2.04-01-2010), Almaty, Kazakhstan
.
27.
Pogoda.ru
,
2012
, “
Climate of Astana
,” http://www.pogoda.ru.net/climate/35188.htm
28.
CNRK 2.04-03-2002
,
2002
, “
Construction Heat Engineering
,” Astana, Kazakhstan.
29.
Construction Norms of Kazakhstan (CNK) 2.04-21-2004
*,
2006
, “Energy Consumption and Thermal Protection of Residential (Civil) Buildings,” Astana, Kazakhstan.
30.
Hong Kong Building Authority, 1995, “Code for OTTV in Buildings,” Hong Kong
.
31.
Allen
and
Jano
,
2001
,
Fundamentals of Building Construction; Materials and Methods
,
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
,
New York
, pp.
230
.
32.
Anas
Zafirol
and
Al-Hafzan
,
2010
, “
Energy Efficiency Towards Building Envelope an Analysis Study Between Main Library of University of Malaya Building and Library of UiTM Perak Building
,”
Int. J. Environ. Sci. Develop
.
1
(
2
), pp.
208
213
.
You do not currently have access to this content.