Solar thermal cracking of methane produces two valuable products, hydrogen gas and solid carbon, both of which can be used as a fuel and as a commodity. During the course of this two-phase phenomenon, carbon particles tend to deposit on the solar reactor window, wall, and exit. When they accumulate at the reactor exit, the agglomeration of these particles completely blocks the exit. This problem has been the major issue preventing solar cracking reactors from running continuously. To address this problem, a cyclone solar reactor was designed to enhance the residence time and allow carbon particles to rotate in the reactor instead of moving towards the exit inlarge particle groups together. A prototype reactor was manufactured to test the concept, to better understand and explain the flow dynamics inside the solar cyclone reactor and to analyze the flow via particle image velocimetry (PIV). Advanced measurement and computational techniques were applied to build the prototype reactor. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis employing discrete phase model (DPM) was used to predict the particle transport phenomenadel (DPM), whereas PIV was applied for the experimental part of the work. To understand the flow evolution along the vortex line, several images in the axial direction along the vortex line were captured. The results showed that when the main flow was increased by 25%, the axial velocity components became larger. It was also observed that the vertical vortices along the vortex line showed stronger interaction with outward fluid in the core region. This implied that the horizontal twisting motion dominated the region due to the main flow, which could trap the particles in the reactor for a longer time. Furthermore, when the main flow was increased by 50%, the flow displayed a cyclone-dominated structure. During the velocity evolution along the vortex line, more vortices emerged between the wall region and core region, implying that the energy was transferred from order to disorder. In summary, by appropriate selection of parameters, the concept of an aero-shielded solar cyclone reactor can be an attractive option to overcome the problem of carbon particle deposition at the reactor walls and exit.

References

References
1.
Ozalp
,
N.
,
2008
, “
Energy and Material Flow Models of Hydrogen Production in the U.S. Chemical Industry
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
33
, pp.
5020
5034
.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.05.094
2.
Ozalp
,
N.
,
Kogan
,
A.
, and
Epstein
,
M.
,
2009
, “
Solar Decomposition of Fossil Fuels as an Option for Sustainability
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
34
(
2
), pp.
710
720
.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.11.019
3.
Elizade
,
I.
,
Rodriguez
,
M. A.
, and
Ancheyta
,
J.
,
2009
, “
Application of Continuous Kinetic Lumping Modeling to Moderate Hydrocracking of Heavy Oil
,”
Appl. Catal., A
,
365
, pp.
237
242
.10.1016/j.apcata.2009.06.018
4.
Ancheyta
,
J.
,
Rana
,
M. S.
, and
Furimsky
,
E.
,
2005
, “
Hydroprocessing of Heavy Petroleum Feeds: Tutorial
,”
Catal. Today
,
109
, pp.
3
15
.10.1016/j.cattod.2005.08.025
5.
Castaneda
,
L. C.
,
Munoz
,
J. A. D.
, and
Ancheyta
,
J.
,
2011
, “
Comparison of Approaches to Determine Hydrogen Consumption During Catalytic Hydrotreating of Oil Fractions
,”
Fuel
,
90
(12), pp.
3593
3601
.10.1016/j.fuel.2010.11.047
6.
Rodat
,
S.
,
Abanades
,
S.
, and
Flamant
,
G.
,
2011
, “
Co-Production of Hydrogen and Carbon Black From Solar Thermal Methane Splitting in a Tubular Reactor Prototype
,”
Sol. Energy
,
85
(
4
), pp.
645
652
.10.1016/j.solener.2010.02.016
7.
Maag
,
G.
,
Rodat
,
S.
,
Flamant
,
G.
, and
Steinfeld
,
A.
,
2010
, “
Heat Transfer Model and Scale-Up of an Entrained-Flow Solar Reactor for the Thermal Decomposition of Methane
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
35
(
24
), pp.
13232
13241
.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.08.119
8.
Muradov
,
N.
,
Smith
,
F.
,
Bockerman
,
G.
, and
Scammon
,
K.
,
2009
, “
Thermocatalytic Decomposition of Natural Gas Over Plasma-Generated Carbon Aerosols for Sustainable Production of Hydrogen and Carbon
,”
Appl. Catal., A
,
365
(
2
), pp.
292
300
.10.1016/j.apcata.2009.06.031
9.
Dahl
,
J. K.
,
Buechler
,
K. J.
,
Weimer
,
A. W.
,
Lewandowski
,
A.
, and
Bingham
,
C.
,
2004
, “
Solar-Thermal Dissociation of Methane in a Fluid-Wall Aerosol Flow Reactor
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
29
(
7
), pp.
725
736
.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2003.08.009
10.
Huang
,
C.
,
Yao
,
W.
,
T-Raissi
,
A.
, and
Muradov
,
N.
,
2011
, “
Development of Efficient Photoreactors for Solar Hydrogen Production
,”
Sol. Energy
,
85
(
1
), pp.
19
27
.10.1016/j.solener.2010.11.004
11.
Kogan
,
A.
,
Israeli
,
M.
, and
Alcobi
,
E.
,
2007
, “
Production of Hydrogen and Carbon by Solar Thermal Methane Splitting. IV. Preliminary Simulation of a Confined Tornado Flow Configuration by Computational Fluid Dynamics
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
32
(
18
), pp.
4800
4810
.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.08.016
12.
Trommer
,
D.
,
Hirsch
,
D.
, and
Steinfeld
,
A.
,
2004
, “
Kinetic Investigation of the Thermal Decomposition of CH4 By Direct Irradiation of a Vortex-Flow Laden With Carbon Particles
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
29
(
6
), pp.
627
633
.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2003.07.001
13.
Kogan
,
A.
, and
Kogan
,
M.
,
2002
, “
The Tornado Flow Configuration—An Effective Method for Screening of a Solar Reactor Window
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
124
, pp.
206
214
.10.1115/1.1487882
14.
Hirsch
,
D.
, and
Steinfield
,
A.
,
2004
, “
Solar Hydrogen Production by Thermal Decomposition of Natural Gas Using a Vortex-Flow Reactor
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
29
, pp.
47
55
.10.1016/S0360-3199(03)00048-X
15.
Ozalp
,
N.
, and
Jayakrishna
,
D.
,
2010
, “
CFD Analysis of Multi-Phase Turbulent Flow in a Solar Reactor for Emission-Free Generation of Hydrogen
,”
Chem. Eng. Trans.
,
21
, pp.
1081
1086
.10.3303/CET1021181
16.
Ozalp
,
N.
, and
Jayakrishna
,
D.
,
2010
, “
CFD Analysis on the Influence of Helical Carving in a Vortex Flow Reactor
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
35
, pp.
6248
6260
.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.03.100
17.
Kogan
,
A.
,
Kogan
,
M.
, and
Barak
,
S.
,
2004
, “
Production of Hydrogen and Carbon by Solar Thermal Methane Splitting. II. Room Temperature Simulation Tests of Seeded Solar Reactor
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
29
, pp.
1227
–1236.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2003.12.002
18.
Ozalp
,
N.
, and
Kanjirakat
,
A.
,
2010
, “
Lagrangian Characterization of Multi-Phase Turbulent Flow in a Solar Reactor for Particle Deposition Prediction
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
35
, pp.
4496
4509
.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.02.065
19.
Ozalp
,
N.
,
2011
, “
An Overview of Solar Thermal Cracking of Natural Gas: Challenges and Solutions Towards Commercialization
,”
8th International Conference on Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics, and Thermodynamics (HEFAT 2011)
, Republic of Mauritius, July 11–13, Paper No. 1569441867.
20.
Shilapuram
,
V.
,
Jayakrishna
,
D.
, and
Ozalp
,
N.
,
2011
, “
Residence Time Distribution Analysis of Aero-Shielded Solar Cyclone Reactor for Emission-Free Generation of Hydrogen
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
,
36
, pp.
13488
13500
.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.08.035
21.
Keane
,
R. D.
, and
Adrian
,
R. J.
,
1991
, “
Optimization of Particle Image Velocimetry: II. Multiple Pulsed Systems
,”
Meas. Sci. Technol.
,
2
, pp.
963
974
.10.1088/0957-0233/2/10/013
22.
Adrian
,
R. J.
,
1997
, “
Dynamic Ranges of Velocity and Spatial Resolution of Particle Image Velocimetry
,”
Meas. Sci. Technol.
,
8
, pp.
1393
1398
.10.1088/0957-0233/8/12/003
23.
Hart
,
D. P.
,
1998
, “
PIV Error Correction, Experiments in Fluids
,”
9th International Symposium on Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics
,
Lisbon, Portugal
, July 13–16.
24.
Nishio
,
S.
,
2008
, “
Uncertainty Analysis and Example for PIV Measurements
,”
Proceedings of 25th International Towing Tank Conference (ITTC)
,
Fukuoka
, Japan, September 14–20.
You do not currently have access to this content.