In recent years, several prototype solar central receivers have been experimentally demonstrated to produce high temperature and high pressure gas capable of driving a gas turbine engine. While these prototype receivers are generally small (<1 MWth), advancements in this technology will allow for the development of solar powered gas turbine engines at a commercial level (sizes of at least several megawatts electric (MWe)). The current paper analyzes a recuperated solar powered gas turbine engine, and addresses engine considerations, such as material limitations, as well as the variable nature of solar input. In order to compensate for changes in solar input, two operational strategies are identified and analyzed. The first is hybridization, meaning the solar input is supplemented via the combustion of fossil fuels. Hybridization often allows for an increase in net power and efficiency by adding heat during periods of low solar thermal input. An alternative strategy is to make use of variable guide vanes on the compressor of the gas turbine engine, which schedule to change the air flow rate into the system. By altering the mass flow rate of air, and assuming a fixed level of heat addition, the operating temperature of the engine can be controlled to maximize power or efficiency. The paper examines how to combine hybridization with variable guide vane operation to optimize gas turbine performance over a wide range of solar thermal input, from zero solar input to solar-only operation. A large material constraint is posed by the combustor, and to address this concern two alternative strategies—one employing a bypass valve and the other a combustor modified to allow higher temperature inlet air—are presented. Combustor modifications could include new materials and/or increased cooling air. The two strategies (bypass versus no bypass) are compared on a thermodynamic basis. It is found that it is possible to operate the gas turbine across the entire range without a significant drop in performance in either design through judicious adjustment of the vanes, though both approaches yield different results for certain ranges of solar input. Finally, a yearly assessment of solar share and thermodynamic performance is presented for a 4.3 MWe gas turbine to identify the overall benefits of the operational strategies. The annualized thermodynamic performance is not appreciably different for the two strategies, so that other factors such as mechanical design, operational issues, economics, etc. must be used to decide the optimal approach.

References

References
1.
Duffie
,
J.
, and
Beckman
,
W.
,
2006
,
Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes
,
Wiley and Sons
,
Hoboken, NJ.
2.
Assessment of Parabolic Trough and Power Tower Solar Technology Cost and Performance Forecasts, 2003
,”
Sargent & Lundy LLC Consulting Group Chicago
,
Illinois
, Report No. NREL/SR-550-34440.
3.
Buck
,
R.
,
Bräuning
,
T.
,
Denk
,
T.
,
Pfänder
,
M.
,
Schwarzböl
,
P.
, and
Tellez
,
F.
,
2002
, “
Solar-Hybrid Gas Turbine-Based Power Tower Systems (REFOS)
,”
J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
124
, pp.
2
9
.10.1115/1.1445444
4.
Lefebvre
,
A.
,
1999
,
Gas Turbine Combustion
,
2nd ed.
,
Taylor and Francis
,
Philadelphia
.
5.
Heller
,
P.
,
Pfänder
,
M.
,
Denk
,
T.
,
Tellez
,
F.
,
Valverde
,
A.
,
Fernandez
,
J.
, and
Ring
,
A.
,
2006
, “
Test and Evaluation of a Solar Powered Gas Turbine System
,”
Sol. Energy
,
80
, pp.
1225
1230
.10.1016/j.solener.2005.04.020
6.
Hunt
,
A.
, and
Miller
,
F.
,
2010
, “
Small Particle Heat Exchange Receivers for Solar Thermal Power
,”
SolarPACES 2010
,
Perpignan, France
,
Sept.
21st–24th
.
7.
SOLGATE Final Publishable Report, 2005
” European Commission, Contract No. #ENK5-CT-2000-00333.
8.
Kitzmiller
,
K.
, and
Miller
,
F.
,
2011
, “
Thermodynamic Cycles for a Small Particle Heat Exchange Receiver Used in Concentrating Solar Power Plants
,”
J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
133
, p.
031014
.10.1115/1.4004270
9.
Kurzke
,
J.
,
2007
, “
GasTurb11 User’s Manual
.”
10.
NASA Glenn Research Center
, 2010, “
CEA History
,” http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/CEAWeb/ceaHistory.htm
11.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
,
2011
, “
NREL System Advisor Model (SAM)
,” https://www.nrel.gov/analysis/sam/
12.
Walsh
,
P.
, and
Fletcher
,
P.
,
2004
,
Gas Turbine Performance
,
Blackwell Science
,
Fairfield, NJ.
13.
Fisher
,
U.
,
Sugarmen
,
C.
,
Ring
,
A.
, and
Sinai
,
J.
,
2004
, “
Gas Turbine “Solarization”—Modifications for Solar/Fuel Hybrid Operation
,”
J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
126
, pp.
872
878
.10.1115/1.1763602
14.
Kitzmiller
,
K.
, and
Miller
,
F.
,
2010
, “
Off-Design Thermodynamic Modeling of Gas Turbine Power Cycles for a Small Particle Solar Receiver
,”
SolarPACES 2010
,
Perpignan, France
,
Sept.
21st–24th
.
You do not currently have access to this content.