Recent studies in the United States suggest that parabolic trough levelized energy costs (LECs) can be reduced 10–15% through integration of a large salt energy storage system coupled with the direct heating of molten salt in the solar field. While noteworthy, this relatively small predicted improvement may not justify the increased technical risks. Examples of potential issues include increased design complexity, higher maintenance costs, and salt freezing in the solar field. To make a compelling argument for development of this new system, we believe that additional technical advances beyond that previously reported will be required to achieve significant LEC reduction, greater than 25%. The new technical advances described include the development of a high-concentration trough that has double aperture and optical concentration of current technology. This trough is predicted to be more cost-effective than current technology because its cost $(/m2)$ and thermal losses $(W/m2)$ are significantly lower. Recent trough optical performance improvements, such as more accurate facets and better alignment techniques, suggest a 2× trough is possible. Combining this new trough with a new low-melting point salt now under development suggests that a LEC cost reduction of $∼25%$ is possible for a 50 MW, 2× salt plant relative to a conventional (1×) 50 MW oil plant. However, the 2× trough will also benefit plants that use synthetic oil in the field. A LEC comparison of 2× plants at sizes $≥200 MW$ shows only a 6% advantage of salt over oil.

1.
Direct Steam Generation R&D presented at NREL’s 2007 Trough Workshop by CIEMAT, DLR, and Schott, http://www.nrel.gov/csp/troughnet/wkshp_2007.htmlhttp://www.nrel.gov/csp/troughnet/wkshp_2007.html
2.
Kelly
,
B.
,
Price
,
H.
,
Brosseau
,
D.
, and
Kearney
,
D.
, 2007, “
Adopting Nitrate/Nitrite Salt Mixtures as the Heat Transport Fluid in Parabolic Trough Power Plants
,”
Proceedings of the Energy Sustainability 2007 Conference
, Long Beach, CA, Jun. 27–30.
3.
Reilly
,
H.
, and
Kolb
,
G.
, 2001, “
Evaluation of Molten Salt Power Tower Technology Based on Experience at Solar Two
,” Sandia National Laboratories Report No. SAND2001-3674.
4.
Mancini
,
Thomas
,
P.
Heller
,
B.
Butler
,
B.
Osborn
,
W.
Schiel
,
V.
Goldberg
,
R.
Buck
,
R.
Diver
, and
C.
Andraka
,
J.
Moreno
, 2003, “
Dish-Stirling Systems: An Overview of Development and Status
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
0199-6231,
135
, pp.
125
151
.
5.
Wendelin
,
T.
, “
Parabolic Trough VSHOT Optical Characterization in 2005-2006
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, www.nrel.gov/docs/fy06osti/40024.pdfwww.nrel.gov/docs/fy06osti/40024.pdf
6.
Typical value for slumped-glass facets from VSHOT analysis performed by T. Wendelin (NREL).
7.
Lupfert
,
E.
,
Geyer
,
M.
,
Schiel
,
W.
,
Esteban
,
A.
,
Osuna
,
R.
,
Zarza
,
E.
, and
Nava
,
P.
, 2001, “
EuroTrough Design Issues and Prototype Testing at PSA
,”
Proceeding of the 2001 ASME Solar Energy Conference
, Washington, DC, Apr. 21–25.
8.
The Center for Solar Energy and Hydrogen Research
(ZSW, Stuttgart, Germany) upgraded Sandia’s HELIOS software in the mid 1990s to model through mirrors. Available from G. Kolb, Sandia.
9.
King
,
D.
, 1983, “
Beam Quality and Tracking Accuracy Evaluation of Second-Generation and Barstow Production Heliostats
,” Sandia National Laboratories Report No. SAND82-0181.
10.
McDowell
,
J.
, 1981, “
Honeycomb Reflector/Structure
,”
Proceedings of the Line-Focus Solar Thermal Energy Technology Development—A Seminar for Industry
, Sandia National Laboratories Report No. SAND80-1666.
11.
Diver
,
R. B.
,
Andraka
,
C.
,
Rawlinson
,
S.
,
Goldberg
,
V.
, and
Thomas
,
G.
, 2001, “
The Advanced Dish Development System Project
,”
ASME Proceedings of Solar Forum 2001
, Washington, DC.
12.
Diver
,
R. B.
, and
Moss
,
T.
, 2007, “
Practical Field Alignment of Parabolic Trough Solar Concentrators
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
0199-6231,
129
, pp.
153
159
.
13.
Boultinghouse
,
K.
, 1982, “
Development of a Solar Flux Tracker for Parabolic Trough Collectors
,” Sandia National Laboratories Report No. SAND82-1600.
14.
Price
,
H.
, 2003, “
A Parabolic Trough Solar Power Plant Simulation Model
,”
ISES 2003
, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, HI, Mar.
15.
Stoddard
,
M.
,
Faas
,
S.
, and
Chiang
,
C.
, and
Dirks
,
J.
, 1987, “
SOLERGY
,” Sandia National Laboratories Report No. SAND86-8060.
16.
,
R.
, and
Brosseau
,
D.
, 2008, “
Improved Molten Salt Formulations for Heat Transfer Fluids in Parabolic Trough Solar Power Systems
,”
Proceedings of the 2008 14th Biennial SolarPACES Symposium
, Las Vegas, NV, Mar. 4–7.
17.
Bendt
,
P.
,
Rabl
,
A.
,
Gaul
,
H. W.
, and
Reed
,
K. A.
, 1979, “
Optical Analysis and Optimization of Line Focus Solar Collectors
,” Solar Energy Research Institute Report No. SERI/TR-34-092.
18.
Lippke
,
F.
, 1995, “
Simulation of the Part-Load Behavior of a 30 MWe SEGS Plant
,” Sandia National Laboratories Report No. SAND95-1293.