The direct steam generation (DSG) in parabolic trough collectors is a promising option to improve the mature parabolic trough solar thermal power plant technology of the solar energy generating systems (SEGS) in California. According to previous studies [Langenkamp, 1998, “Revised LEC Projections and Discussion of Different DSG Benefits,” Technical Report No. DISS-SC-QA-02, Almeria, Spain; Price, et al., 2002, “Advances in Parabolic Trough Solar Power Technology,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 124(2), pp. 109–125; Zarza, E., 2002, “DISS Phase II Final Report,” Technical Report EU Contract No. JOR3-CT98-0277, Almeria, Spain], the cost reduction in the DSG process compared with the SEGS technology is expected to be 8–25%. All these studies were more or less preliminary since they lacked detailed information on the design of collector fields, absorber tubes required for steam temperatures higher than $400°C$, and power blocks adapted to the specific needs of the direct steam generation. Power blocks and collector fields were designed for four different capacities ($5 MWel$, $10 MWel$, $50 MWel$, and $100 MWel$) and different live steam parameters. The live steam temperature was varied between saturation temperature and $500°C$ and live steam pressures of 40 bars, 64 bars, and 100 bars were investigated. To assess the different cases, detailed yield analyses of the overall system were performed using hourly data for the direct normal irradiation and the ambient temperature for typical years. Based on these results, the levelized costs of electricity were determined for all cases and compared with a reference system using synthetic oil as heat transfer fluid. This paper focuses on two main project findings. First, the $50 MWel$ DSG system parameter comparisons are presented. Second, the detailed comparison between a DSG and a SEGS-like $100 MWel$ system is given. The main result of the investigation is that the benefit of the DSG process depends on the project site and can reach an 11% reduction in the levelized electricity cost.

1.
Eck
,
M.
,
Benz
,
N.
,
Feldhoff
,
J. F.
,
Gilon
,
Y.
,
Hacker
,
Z.
,
Müller
,
T.
,
Riffelmann
,
K. -J.
,
Silmy
,
K.
, and
Tislaric
,
D.
, 2008, “
The Potential of Direct Steam Generation in Parabolic Troughs-Results of the German Project DIVA
,”
14th Biennial CSP SolarPACES Symposium
, Las Vegas, NV.
2.
Cable
,
R. G.
,
Cohen
,
G. E.
,
Kearney
,
D. W.
, and
Price
,
H. W.
, 1998, “
SEGS plant performance 1989-1997
,”
1998 International Solar Energy Conference
, Albuquerque, NM, pp.
445
452
.
3.
Forristall
,
R.
, 2003, “
Heat Transfer Analysis and Modeling of a Parabolic Trough Solar Receiver Implemented in Engineering Equation Solver
,” Technical Report No. NREL/TP-550-34169, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
4.
Eck
,
M.
, and
Zarza
,
E.
, 2002, “
Assessment of Operation Modes for Direct Solar Steam Generation in Parabolic Troughs
,”
11th SolarPACES International Symposium on Concentrated Solar Power and Chemical Energy Technologies
, Zurich, Switzerland.
5.
Hirsch
,
T.
, and
Eck
,
M.
, 2006, “
Simulation of the Start-Up Procedure of a Parabolic Trough Collector Field With Direct Solar Steam Generation
,”
Fifth International Modelica Conference
, Vienna, Austria.
6.
Birnbaum
,
J.
,
Eck
,
M.
,
Fichtner
,
M.
,
Hirsch
,
T.
,
Lehmann
,
D.
, and
Zimmermann
,
G.
, 2008, “
A Direct Steam Generation Solar Power Plant With Integrated Thermal Storage
,”
14th Bienial SolarPACES Symposium
, Las Vegas, NV.
7.
Birnbaum
,
J.
,
Hirsch
,
T.
,
Eck
,
M.
,
Pitz-Paal
,
R.
,
Fichtner
,
M.
, and
Zimmermann
,
G.
, 2008, “
A Concept for Future Parabolic Trough Based Solar Thermal Power Plants
,”
15th International Conference on the Properties of Water and Steam
, Berlin, Germany.