Numerous previous works have shown that vertical shear in wind speed and wind direction exist in the atmospheric boundary layer. In this work, meteorological forcing mechanisms, such as the Ekman spiral, thermal wind, and inertial oscillation, are discussed as likely drivers of such shears in the statically stable environment. Since the inertial oscillation, the Ekman spiral, and statically stable conditions are independent of geography, potentially significant magnitudes of speed and direction shear are hypothesized to occur to some extent at any inland site in the world. The frequency of occurrence of non-trivial magnitudes of speed and direction shear are analyzed from observation platforms in Lubbock, Texas and Goodland, Indiana. On average, the correlation between speed and direction shear magnitudes and static atmospheric stability are found to be very high. Moreover, large magnitude speed and direction shears are observed in conditions with relatively high hub-height wind speeds. The effects of speed and direction shear on wind turbine power performance are tested by incorporating a simple steady direction shear profile into the fatigue analysis structures and turbulence simulation code from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. In general, the effect on turbine power production varies with the magnitude of speed and direction shear across the turbine rotor, with the majority of simulated conditions exhibiting power loss relative to a zero shear baseline. When coupled with observational data, the observed power gain is calculated to be as great as 0.5% and depletion as great as 3% relative to a no shear baseline. The average annual power change at Lubbock is estimated to be $−0.5%$.

1.
Jones
,
S.
, and
Randall
,
G.
, 2006, “
Examining Project Underperformance
,”
Proceedings of the American Wind Energy Association Windpower 2006 Conference
,
American Wind Energy Association
,
Washington, DC.
2.
Elliot
,
D. L.
, 1979, “
Adjustment and Analysis of Data for Regional Wind Energy Assessments
,”
Proceedings of the Workshop on Wind Climate
, pp.
121
131
.
3.
Kelley
,
N.
,
Shirazi
,
M.
,
Jager
,
D.
,
Wilde
,
S.
,
,
J.
,
Buhl
,
M.
,
Sullivan
,
P.
, and
Patton
,
E.
, 2004, “
Lamar Low-Level Jet Project Interim Report
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, National Wind Technology Center, Golden, CO, Technical Paper No. NREL/TP-500-34593.
4.
Hunter
,
R.
,
Pedersen
,
T.
,
Dunbabin
,
P.
,
Antoniou
,
I.
,
Frandsen
,
S.
,
Klug
,
H.
,
Albers
,
A.
, and
Lee
,
W.
, 2001, “
European Wind Turbine Testing Procedure Developments—Task 1: Measurement Method to Verify Wind Turbine Performance Characteristics
,”
Risø National Laboratory
, Roskilde, Denmark, Technical Report No. Risø-R-1209(EN).
5.
Sumner
,
J.
, and
Masson
,
C.
, 2006, “
Influence of Atmospheric Stability on Wind Turbine Power Performance Curves
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
0199-6231,
128
(
4
), pp.
531
538
.
6.
Elliott
,
D. L.
, and
,
J. B.
, 1990, “
Effects of Wind Shear and Turbulence on Wind Turbine Power Curves
,”
Proceedings of the European Community Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition
.
7.
Petersen
,
E. L.
,
Mortensen
,
L.
,
Landberg
,
L.
,
Højstrup
,
J.
, and
Frank
,
H. P.
, 1997, “
Wind Power Meteorology
,” Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark, Technical Document No. Risø-I-1206(EN).
8.
Giebel
,
G.
, and
Gryning
,
S. E.
, 2004, “
Shear and Stability in High Met Masts, and How WAsP Treats It
,” EWEA Special Topic Conference, The Science of Making Torque From Wind, Delft, Netherlands, Euro. Wind Energy Assoc., 8 pp.
9.
,
F. T. M.
, 1984, “
The Turbulent Structure of the Stable, Nocturnal Boundary Layer
,”
J. Atmos. Sci.
0022-4928,
41
, pp.
2202
2216
.
10.
,
F. T. M.
, 1985, “
A Model for the Stationary, Stable Boundary Layer
,”
Turbulence and Diffusion in Stable Environments
,
J. C. R.
Hunt
, ed.,
Clarendon
,
Oxford
, pp.
149
179
.
11.
Stull
,
R. B.
, 1988,
An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology
,
,
Dordrecht, The Netherlands
.
12.
Gossard
,
E. E.
,
Gaynor
,
J. E.
,
Zamora
,
R. J.
, and
Neff.
,
W. D.
, 1985, “
Finestructure of Elevated Stable Layers Observed by Sounder and In-Situ Tower Sensors
,”
J. Atmos. Sci.
0022-4928,
42
(
20
), pp.
2156
2169
.
13.
Anderson
,
P. S.
, 2003, “
Fine-Scale Structure Observed in a Stable Atmospheric Boundary Layer by SODAR and Kite-Borne Tethersonde
,”
Boundary-Layer Meteorol.
0006-8314,
107
, pp.
323
351
.
14.
Balsey
,
B. B.
,
Frehlich
,
R. G.
,
Jensen
,
M. L.
,
Meillier
,
Y.
, and
Muschinski
,
A.
, 2003, “
Extreme Gradients in the Nocturnal Boundary Layer: Structure, Evolution, and Potential Causes
,”
J. Atmos. Sci.
0022-4928,
60
, pp.
2496
2508
.
15.
Holmes
,
J. D.
, 2001,
,
Spon
,
London
, pp.
47
.
16.
Global Energy Concepts
, LLC., 2005, “
Indiana Energy Group Tall Towers Wind Study Final Project Report
,” http://www.in.gov/energy/technologies/windmap.htmlhttp://www.in.gov/energy/technologies/windmap.html.
18.
Jonkman
,
J. M.
, and
Buhl
,
M. L.
, Jr.
, 2005, “
FAST User’s Guide
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, Paper No. NREL/EL-500-38230.
20.
Moriarty
,
P. J.
, and
Hansen
,
A. C.
, 2005, “
AeroDyn Theory Manual
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, Paper No. NREL/EL-500-36881.
21.
Walter
,
K.
,
Weiss
,
C. C.
,
Swift
,
A. H. P.
,
Chapman
,
J.
, and
Kelley
,
N.
, 2007, “
Tall Tower Wind Shear Observations in the Stable Nocturnal Boundary layer
,”
Proceedings of the 45th American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
,
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
,
Reston, VA.
22.
Malcolm
,
D. J.
, and
Hansen
,
A. C.
, 2006, “
WindPACT Turbine Rotor Design Study
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, Paper No. NREL/SR-500-32495.