This work undertakes an aerodynamic analysis over the parked and the rotating NREL Phase VI wind turbine blade. The experimental sequences from NASA Ames wind tunnel selected for this study respond to the parked blade and the rotating configuration, both for the upwind, two-bladed wind turbine operating at nonyawed conditions. The objective is to bring some light into the nature of the flow field and especially the type of stall behavior observed when 2D aerofoil steady measurements are compared to the parked blade and the latter to the rotating one. From averaged pressure coefficients together with their standard deviation values, trailing and leading edge separated flow regions have been found, with the limitations of the repeatability of the flow encountered on the blade. Results for the parked blade show the progressive delay from tip to root of the trailing edge separation process, with respect to the 2D profile, and also reveal a local region of leading edge separated flow or bubble at the inner, 30% and 47% of the blade. For the rotating blade, results at inboard 30% and 47% stations show a dramatic suppression of the trailing edge separation, and the development of a leading edge separation structure connected with the extra lift.

1.
Butterfield
,
C. P.
,
Musial
,
W. P.
,
Scott
,
G. N.
, and
Simms
,
D. A.
, 1992, “
NREL Combined Experiment Final Report Phase II
,” Technical Report No. NREL-TP-442-4807, NREL.
2.
Madsen
,
H. A.
, and
Christensen
,
H. F.
, 1990, “
On the Relative Importance of Rotational, Unsteady and Three-dimensional Effects on the HAWT Rotor Aerodynamics
,”
Wind Eng.
0309-524X,
14
(
6
), pp.
405
415
.
3.
Ronsten
,
G.
, 1992, “
Static Pressure Measurements on a Rotating and Non-Rotating 2.375m Wind Turbine Blade. Comparison With 2D Calculations
,”
J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
0167-6105,
39
, pp.
105
118
.
4.
Simms
,
D. A.
,
Schreck
,
S.
,
Hand
,
M. M.
,
Fingersh
,
L. J.
,
Jager
,
D. W.
,
Cotrell
,
J. R.
, and
Larwood
,
S. M.
, 2001, “
Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment Phase VI: Wind Tunnel Test Configurations and Available Data Campaigns
,” NREL-TP-500-29955, NREL.
5.
Schreck
,
S.
, and
Robinson
,
M.
, 2002, “
Dynamic Stall and Rotational Augmentation in Recent Wind Turbine Aerodynamics Experiments
,”
Second AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit
,
St. Luis, MO
.
6.
Schreck
,
S.
, and
Robinson
,
M.
, 2003, “
Structures and Interactions Underlying Rotational Augmentation of Blade Aerodynamic Response
,” AIAA Paper No. 2003-0520.
7.
Schreck
,
S.
,
Sorensen
,
N.
, and
Robinson
,
M.
, 2007, “
Aerodynamic Structures and Processes in Rotationally Augmented Flow Fields
,”
Wind Energy
1095-4244,
10
(
2
), pp.
159
178
.
8.
van Rooij
,
R. P. J. O. M.
, and
Schepers
,
J. G.
, 2005, “
The Effect of Blade Geometry on the Normal Force Distribution of a Rotating Blade
,”
43rd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference
,
Toronto, ON, Canada
.
9.
Munduate
,
X.
, and
Gonzalez
,
A.
, 2005, “
3D Blade Geometry Stall at Parked and Rotating Conditions on the NREL Phase VI at Zero Yaw Angle
,”
IEA Annex XX Symposium
,
Pamplona, Spain
.
10.
Gonzalez
,
A.
, and
Munduate
,
X.
, 2006, “
Flow Development on the NREL UAE Phase VI Rotating Blade
,”
IEA Annex XX Symposium
,
Kiel, Germany
.
11.
Crabtree
,
L. F.
, 1957, “
The Formation of Regions of Separated Flow on Wing Surfaces
,” Reports and Memoranda No. 3122, RAE.
You do not currently have access to this content.