This study attempts to obtain more detailed knowledge of failures of wind turbines (WTs) by using the German “$250MW$ Wind” test program database. Specific objectives are to show the reliability of some major components and to analyze how their design has advanced through time, what the main failures are, and which technologies have proven to work. Within the program, reports on operation and maintenance are analyzed with respect to WT type, size, and technologies used. This paper presents a comparison of component reliability through time, with respect to their technology. The results show significant differences in reliability for certain subcomponents depending on the size of the WT and especially on the type of power control. For instance, induction generators show half the annual failure rate compared to synchronous generators. The study also includes failures of other components that are affected or added due to the use of the components being analyzed. In general, the results show that failure rates of WTs decrease with time. Most of the data show a short period of “early failures” and later a long period of “random failures.” However, this is not the case for the megawatt class: As technology is introduced into the market, WTs show a longer early failure behavior, which has not yet become stable. Furthermore, large turbines, included in the database analyzed, show a significantly higher annual failure rate of components, per WT. This may be due to the immature technology of the WTs included in the database.

1.
Gasch
,
R.
, and
Twele
,
J.
, 2002,
Wind Power Plants
,
Solarpraxis and James & James (Science Publishers) Ltd.
,
London
, Chaps. 1–3.
2.
Hansen
,
M. O. L.
, 2002,
Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines
,
James & James (Science Publishers) Ltd.
,
London
.
3.
2006, “
Wind Energy Report Germany 2006
,” ISET, Kassel.
4.
1995–2004, “
Eggersglüß: Windenergie X Praxisergebnisse, Landwirtschaftskammer Schleswig-Holstein
,” Germany.
5.
1999–2001, “
,” 12(4)–14(3), Denmark.
6.
Ribrant
,
J.
2006, “
Reliability Performance and Maintenance—A Survey of Failures in Wind Power Systems
,” MS thesis, KTH School of Electrical Engineering, Stockholm.
7.
Van Bussel
,
G. J. W.
, and
Zaaijer
,
M. B.
, 2003, “
Estimation of Turbine Reliability Figures Within the DOWEC Project
,” TU Delft, Report No. 10048.
8.
Durstewitz
,
M.
, 2005, “
A Statistical Evaluation of Icing Failures in Germany’s ’250MW Wind’ Program
,” ISET, Kassel.
9.
Tavner
,
P. J.
,
Edwards
,
C.
,
Brinkman
,
A.
, and
Spinato
,
F.
, 2006, “
Influence of Wind Speed on Wind Turbine Reliability
,”
Int. J. Energy Res.
0363-907X,
30
(
1
), pp.
55
72
.
10.
Hahn
,
B.
,
Durstewitz
,
M.
, and
Rohrig
,
K.
, 2007, “
Reliability of Wind Turbines
,”
Wind Energy: Proceedings of the Euromech Colloquium
, S. 329–332,
Springer-Verlag
,
Berlin
.
11.
Tavner
,
P. J.
,
Xiang
,
J.
, and
Spinato
,
F.
, 2005, “
Improving the Reliability of Wind Turbine Generation and Its Impact on Overall Distribution Network Reliability
,”
18th International Conference on Electrical Distribution
,
CIRED
,
Turin
.
12.
Tavner
,
P. J.
,
Van Bussel
,
G. J. W.
, and
Spinato
,
F.
, 2006, “
Machine and Converter Reliabilities in Wind Turbines
,”
Third IET International Conference on Power Electronics, Machines and Drives
, pp.
127
130
.
13.
Tavner
,
P. J.
, Xiang, 2005, “
Wind Turbine Reliability, How Does It Compare With Other Embedded Generation Sources
,”
IEE RTDN Conference
,
London
.
14.
Rao
,
S. S.
, 1992,
Reliability-Based Design
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
15.
2008, NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods, http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/.
16.
Broemm
,
W. J.
,
Ellner
,
P. M.
, and
Woodworth
,
W. J.
, 2000, “
AMSAA Reliability Growth Guide
,” Army Materiel Systems Analysis Activity Aberdeen Proving Ground, AMSAA-TR-652.
17.
Van Bussel
,
G. J.W.
, 2002, “
Offshore Wind Energy, the Reliability Dilemma
,”
Proceedings of the International Conference
,
Berlin
,
Germany
, Jul. 2–6.