Delamination between plies is the root cause of many failures of composite material structures such as wind turbine blades. Design methodologies to prevent such failures have not been widely available for the materials and processes used in blades. This paper presents simplified methodologies for the prediction of delamination in typical structural details in blades under both static and fatigue loading. The methodologies are based on fracture mechanics. The critical strain-energy release rate, $GIC$ and $GIIC,$ are determined for opening mode (I) and shearing mode (II) delamination cracks; fatigue crack growth in each mode is also characterized. These data can be used directly for matrix selection and as properties for the prediction of delamination in structural details. The strain-energy release rates are then determined for an assumed interlaminar flaw in a structural detail. The flaw is positioned based on finite-element analysis (FEA), and the strain-energy release rates are calculated using the virtual crack closure feature available in codes like ANSYS®. The methodologies have been validated for a skin-stiffener intersection. Two prediction methods differing in complexity and data requirements have been explored. Results for both methods show good agreement between predicted and experimental delamination loads under both static and fatigue loading.

1.
U.S. Department of Defense, 1997, “The Composite Materials Handbook,” MIL-17 Mil-HDBK-17-1F, January.
2.
Mandell, J. F., and Samborsky, D. D., 1995, “MSU/DOE Wind Turbine Blade Composite Material Fatigue Database,” Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 87185, November, Updates available at www.sandia.gov/Renewable_Energy/wind_energy/other/973002upd02.pdf
3.
Mandell, J. F., Samborsky, D. D., and Cairns, D. S., 2002, “Fatigue of Composite Materials and Substructures for Wind Turbine Blades,” Contractor Report SAND2002-0771, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM (2002).
4.
Broek, D., 1986, “Elementary Engineering Fracture Mechanics,” 4th Edition, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
5.
Reeder, J. R., 1993, In: Composite Materials: Testing and Design (11th vol.), ASTM STP 1206, E. T. Camponeschi, Jr., Ed., American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 303–322.
6.
Friedrich, K., ed., 1989, Composite Materials Series (vol. 6), Application of Fracture Mechanics to Composite Materials, R. B. Pipes, series ed., Elsevier, New York, NY.
7.
Davies, P., and Benzeggagh, M. L., 1989, In: Composite Materials Series (vol. 6), Application of Fracture Mechanics to Composite Materials, K. Friedrich, ed., Elsevier, New York, NY.
8.
Russell, A. J., and Street, K. N., 1986, In: Delamination and Debonding, ASTM STP 876, W. S. Johnston, Ed., American Society for Testing and Materials, Phil., pp. 349–370.
9.
Russell, A. J., and Street, K. N., 1985, In: Delamination and Debonding of Materials, ASTM STP 876, W. S. Johnson, ed., American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, pp. 349–370.
10.
Cairns
,
D. S.
,
1992
,
J. Compos. Technol. Res.
,
14
(
1
), pp.
37
42
.
11.
Mignery, L. A., Tan, T. M., and Sun, C. T., 1985, In: Delamination and Debonding, ASTM STP 876, W. S. Johnson, ed., American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 371–385.
12.
Hyer, M. W., and Cohen, D., 1987, Proceedings of the 28th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, AIAA, Washington, DC, April.
13.
Mandell, J. F., and Tsai, J. Y., 1990, “Effects of Porosity on Delamination of Resin Matrix Composites,” Report WRTC-TR-89-3032, Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio.
14.
Mandell, J. F., Samborsky, D. D., Li, M., Orozco, R., and Cairns, D. S., 2000, Wind Energy 2000, AIAA-2000-0057, ASME/AIAA, pp. 354–366.
15.
Bathias, C., and Laksimi, A., 1985, Delamination and Debonding of Materials, ASTM STP 876, W. S. Johnson, Ed., ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 217–237.
16.
“Volume I, Procedures, Chapter 3 Structural Analysis, Section 3.9 Fracture Mechanics,” ANSYS User’s Manual, pp. 3–163.