In modern wind turbine blades, airfoils of more than 25% thickness can be found at mid-span and inboard locations. At mid-span, aerodynamic requirements dominate, demanding a high lift-to-drag ratio, moderate to high lift and low roughness sensitivity. Towards the root, structural requirements become more important. In this paper, the performance for the airfoil series DU FFA, S8xx, AH, Risø and NACA are reviewed. For the 25% and 30% thick airfoils, the best performing airfoils can be recognized by a restricted upper-surface thickness and an S-shaped lower surface for aft-loading. Differences in performance of the DU 91-W2-250 (25%), S814 (24%) and Risø-A1-24 (24%) airfoils are small. For a 30% thickness, the DU 97-W-300 meets the requirements best. Reduction of roughness sensitivity can be achieved both by proper design and by application of vortex generators on the upper surface of the airfoil. Maximum lift and lift-to-drag ratio are, in general, enhanced for the rough configuration when vortex generators are used. At inboard locations, 2-D wind tunnel tests do not represent the performance characteristics well because the influence of rotation is not included. The RFOIL code is believed to be capable of approximating the rotational effect. Results from this code indicate that rotational effects dramatically reduce roughness sensitivity effects at inboard locations. In particular, the change in lift characteristics in the case of leading edge roughness for the 35% and 40% thick DU airfoils, DU 00-W-350 and DU 00-W-401, respectively, is remarkable. As a result of the strong reduction of roughness sensitivity, the design for inboard airfoils can primarily focus on high lift and structural demands.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
rotors, wind turbines, rough surfaces, aerodynamics, sensitivity, drag, physics computing
Topics:
Airfoils, Surface roughness, Blades, Design
1.
Corten, G. P., and Veldkamp, H. F., 2001, “Insects Cause Double Stall,” 2001 European Wind Energy Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 470–474.
2.
Drela, M., 1985, “Two-Dimensional Transonic Aerodynamic Design and Analysis Using Euler Equations,” Doctor Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA, USA.
3.
Rooij, R. P. J. O. M. van, 1996, “Modification of the Boundary Layer Calculation in RFOIL for Improved Airfoil Stall Prediction,” Report IW-96087R, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands. http://www.windenergy.citg.tudelft.nl/.
4.
Snel, H., Houwink, R., and Bosschers, J., 1993, “Sectional Prediction of Lift Coefficients on Rotating Wind Turbine Blades in Stall,” Report ECN-93-052, Energy Research Center of the Netherlands, Petten, the Netherlands.
5.
Snel, H., Houwink, R., Bosschers, J., Piers, W. J., van Bussel, G. J. W., and Bruining, A., 1993, “Sectional Prediction of 3-D Effects for Stalled Flow on Rotating Blades and Comparison With Measurements,” Proceedings European Community Wind Energy Conference, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, pp. 395–399.
6.
Berg, B. van den, 1976, “Investigations of Three-Dimensional Incompressible Turbulent Boundary Layers,” Doctor thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands, also in Report NLR TR 76001 U, National Aerospace Laboratory NLR, the Netherlands.
7.
Bosschers, J., Montgomery, B., Brand, A., and van Rooij, R., 1996, “Influence of Blade Rotation on the Sectional Aerodynamics of Rotational Blades,” 22nd European Rotorcraft Forum 1996, Bristol, England.
8.
Brand, A. J., van Garrel, A., Snel, H., Rozendal, Houwink, D. R., van Rooij, R. P. J. O. M., and Timmer, W. A., 2000, “Voorstudie Radiale Stroming in Overtrek” (Preparatory study on the effects of radial flow in stall), Report ECN-C-00-002 (in Dutch), Energy Research Center of the Netherlands, Petten, the Netherlands.
9.
Rooij, R. P. J. O. M. van, 2001, “Experiments on Wind Turbine Airfoils and Wind Turbine Rotors,” International Wind Tunnel Symposium—Memorial Ceremony of Mie University Satellite Venture Business Laboratory, Tsu, Japan.
10.
Ro¨nsten
,
R.
,
1992
, “
Static Pressure Measurements on a Rotating and a Nonrotating 2.375 m Wind Turbine Blade. Comparison With 2-D Calculations
,”
J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
,
39
, pp.
105
–
118
, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
11.
Timmer, W. A., van Rooij, R. P. J. O. M., and Bruining, A., 1999, “Measured Section Performance of Rotating Blades as Input to the Design of Inboard Airfoils,” Proceedings European Wind Energy Conference, Nice, France, pp. 679–682.
12.
Althaus, D., 1997, “Airfoils and Experimental Results From the Laminar Wind Tunnel of the Institut fu¨r Aerodynamik und Gasdynamik der Universita¨t Stuttgart,” ISBN 3-528-03820-9, Stuttgart, Germany.
13.
Fuglsang, P., Antoniou, I., Dahl, K., and Madsen, H., 1998, “Wind Tunnel Tests of the FFA-W3-241, FFA-W3-301 and NACA 63-430 Airfoils,” Risø-R-1041(EN), Roskilde, Denmark.
14.
Bjo¨rck, A., 1993, “2-D Airfoil Wind Tunnel Test at Stall,” Presented at the IEA 7th Symposium on Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines, TU-Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
15.
Braslow, A. L., and Knox, E. C., 1958, “Simplified Method for Determination of Critical Height of Distributed Roughness Particles for Boundary-Layer Transition at Mach Numbers From 0 to 5,” NACA technical note 4363, USA.
16.
Timmer, W. A., and van Rooij, R. P. J. O. M., 1993, “Wind Tunnel Results for a 25% Thick Wind Turbine Blade Airfoil,” Proceedings European Community Wind Energy Conference, Lu¨beck-Travemu¨nde, Germany, pp. 416–419.
17.
Somers, D. M., and Tangler, J. L., 1995, “Wind-Tunnel Test of the S814 Thick Root Airfoil,” Proceedings of ASME 1995, and SED-Vol. 16, Wind Energy—1995, Reno, NV, USA.
18.
Timmer, W. A., 1990, “WECS Blade Airfoils—The NACA 63-4XX Series,” Proceedings European Community Wind Energy Conference, Madrid, Spain, pp. 243–246.
19.
Timmer, W. A., 1993, “The Design and Testing of Airfoil DU 91-W2-250,”Proceedings of the 6th IEA Symposium on the Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines, ETSU-N-125, Future Energy Solutions, Oxfordshire, England.
20.
Fuglsang, P., and Bak, C., 1999, “Wind Tunnel Tests of the Risø-A1-18, Risø-A1-21 and Risø-A1-24 Airfoils,” Report Risø-R-1112(EN), Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark.
21.
Timmer, W. A., and van Rooij, R. P. J. O. M., 1998, “Ontwerp en Windtunneltest van Profiel DU 97-W-300” (Design and Wind Tunnel Measurements of the DU 97-W-300 Airfoil), Report IW-98003R (In Dutch), Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
22.
Timmer, W. A., and van Rooij, R. P. J. O. M., 2003, “Summary of the Delft University Wind Turbine Dedicated Airfoils,” 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Paper no. AIAA-2003-0352, Reno, NV, USA, pp. 22–31.
Copyright © 2003
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.