A composite linear state-space controller was developed for a multi-objective problem in the variable-speed operation of wind turbines. Disturbance Tracking Control theory was applied to the design of a torque controller to optimize energy capture under the influence of persistent wind disturbances. A limitation in the theory for common multi-state models is described; this led to the design of a complementary pitch controller. The goal of the independent blade pitch design was to minimize blade root fatigue loads. A SymDyn model of a two-bladed, 600-kW machine was used for the simulation studies. Results indicate a 24% reduction in blade fatigue damage using the proposed controllers, compared to a conventional torque-only design. However, energy capture was not improved as much as expected, partly due to nonlinearity effects degrading the performance of the state-space estimator design. Tower base fatigue damage was shown to decrease significantly using active pitch.

1.
Muljadi, E., Butterfield, C. P., and Migliore, P., 1996, “Variable-Speed Operation of Generators with Rotor-Speed Feedback in Wind Power Applications,” Proc. 15th ASME Wind Energy Symposium, Houston, TX.
2.
Ekelund
,
T.
,
2000
, “
Yaw control for reduction of structural dynamic loads in wind turbines
,”
J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
, Elseiver Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands,
85
, pp.
241
262
.
3.
Bossanyi
,
E. A.
,
2000
, “
The Design of Closed Loop Controllers for Wind Turbines
,”
J. Wind Energy
, Wiley and Sons
3
, pp.
149
163
.
4.
Liebst
,
B. S.
,
1983
, “
Pitch Control for Large-Scale Wind Turbines
,”
J. Energy
,
7
, pp.
182
192
.
5.
Balas, M. J., Lee, Y. J., and Kendall, L., 1998, “Disturbance Tracking Control Theory with Application to Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines,” Proc. 17th ASME Wind Energy Symposium, Reno, NV, pp. 95–99.
6.
Allen, S., Balas, M. J., and Counts, L, 1999, “A Multi-Controller Approach to Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines,” Proc. 18th ASME Wind Energy Symposium, Reno, NV, pp. 77–86.
7.
Stol, K. and Bir, G., 2003, “User’s Guide for SymDyn, version 1.1,” http://wind.nrel.gov/designcodes/symdyn/symdyn.pdf, accessed February 24, 2003.
8.
Stol, K., 2001, “Dynamics Modeling and Periodic Control of Horizontal-Axis Wind Turbines,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO.
9.
Laino, D. J. and Hansen, A. C., 2002, “User’s Guide to the Wind Turbine Aerodynamics Computer Software AeroDyn,” Version 12.50, http://wind.nrel.gov/designcodes/aerodyn/aerodyn.pdf, accessed February 24, 2003.
10.
Wiberg, D. M., 1971, State Space and Linear Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
11.
Kwakernaak, H. and Sivan, R., 1972, Linear Optimal Control Systems, Wiley Interscience, NY.
12.
Buhl Jr, M. L., 2001, “SNwind User’s Guide,” http://wind.nrel.gov/designcodes/snwind/snwind.pdf, accessed August 15, 2002.
13.
Downing
,
S. D.
, and
Socie
,
D. F.
,
1982
, “
Simple Rainflow Counting Algorithms
,”
Int. J. Fatigue
,
4-1
, pp.
31
34
.
14.
Miner
,
A. A.
,
1945
, “
Cumulative Damage in Fatigue
,”
Trans. ASME
,
67
, p.
A159
A159
.
15.
Fingersh, L. J. and Carlin, P. W., 1998, “Results from the NREL Variable-Speed Test Bed,” Proc. 17th ASME Wind Energy Symposium, Reno, NV, pp. 233–237.
You do not currently have access to this content.