Performance of a model-based periodic gain controller for wind turbines is presented using Disturbance Accommodating Control (DAC) techniques to estimate fluctuating wind disturbances. The control objective is to regulate rotor speed at above-rated wind speeds while mitigating cyclic blade root loads. Actuation is via individual blade pitch, and sensors are limited to rotor angle and speed. The modeled turbine is a two-bladed, downwind machine with simple blade and tower flexibility having four degrees of freedom. Comparisons are made to a time-invariant DAC controller and to a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) design. Simulations are performed using a fluctuating wind input and a nonlinear turbine model. Results indicate that the state-space control designs are effective in reducing blade loads without a sacrifice in speed regulation. The periodic controller shows the most potential because it uses a time-varying turbine model to estimate unmeasured states. The use of additional sensors to help reconstruct the blade flap rate can significantly improve the level of load attenuation, as witnessed in full-state feedback results.

1.
Johnson, C. D., 1976, “Theory of Disturbance Accommodating Controllers,” Advances in Control and Dynamic Systems, 12, ed. C. T. Leondes.
2.
Kendall
,
L.
,
Balas
,
M.
,
Lee
,
Y. J.
, and
Fingersh
,
L. J.
,
1997
, “
Application of Proportional-Integral and Disturbance Accommodating Control of Variable Speed Variable Pitch Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines
,”
Wind Eng.
,
21
, pp.
21
38
.
3.
Stol, K., Rigney, B., and Balas, M., 2000, “Disturbance Accommodating Control of a Variable-Speed Turbine Using a Symbolic Dynamics Structural Model,” Proc. 19th ASME Wind Energy Symp., Reno, NV, pp. 84–90.
4.
Wright, A. D., and Balas, M. J., 2003, “Design of Modern Controls for the Controlled Advanced Research Turbine (CART),” Proc. 22nd ASME Wind Energy Symp., Reno, NV, pp. 304–316.
5.
McKillip, R., 1984, “Periodic Control of the Individual-Blade-Control Helicopter Rotor,” Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
6.
Jensen, K. E., Fahroo, F., and Ross, I. M., 1998, “Application of Optimal Periodic Control Theory to the Orbit Reboost Problem,” Proc. AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Univelt, Inc., San Diego, CA, pp. 935–945.
7.
Liebst
,
B. S.
,
1983
, “
Pitch Control for Large-Scale Wind Turbines
,”
J. Energy
,
7
, pp.
182
192
.
8.
Ekelund
,
T.
,
2000
, “
Yaw Control for Reduction of Structural Dynamic Loads in Wind Turbines
,”
J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
,
85
, pp.
241
262
, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., Amsterdam, Netherlands.
9.
Stol
,
K.
, and
Balas
,
M.
,
2001
, “
Full-State Feedback Control of a Variable-Speed Wind Turbine: A Comparison of Periodic and Constant Gains
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
123
(
4
), pp.
319
326
.
10.
Stol, K., and Bir, G., 2003, “User’s Guide for SymDyn, version 1.1,” http://wind.nrel.gov/designcodes/symdyn/symdyn.pdf, accessed February 24.
11.
Stol, K., 2001, “Dynamics Modeling and Periodic Control of Horizontal-Axis Wind Turbines,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO.
12.
Hansen, A. C., 1996, Users Guide to the Wind Turbine Dynamics Computer Programs YawDyn and AeroDyn for ADAMS, Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
13.
Bittanti, S., Laub, A. J., and Willems, J. C. (eds.), 1991, The Riccati Equation, Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 127–162.
14.
Kwakernaak, H., and Sivan, R., 1972, Linear Optimal Control Systems, Wiley Interscience, New York.
15.
Stol, K., and Balas, M., 2002, “Periodic Disturbance Accommodating Control for Speed Regulation of Wind Turbines,” Proc. 21st AIAA/ASME Wind Energy Symp., Reno, NV, pp. 310–320.
You do not currently have access to this content.