A new integrated device (called the BF3) has been developed, which enables the simultaneous measurement of horizontal global and diffuse irradiance as well as sunshine presence at any time. The sensor needs no specific polar alignment or routine adjustment, and works at any latitude. To evaluate the performance of this new device, a BF3 sensor was installed on the roof of a six-story building in the Merchiston Campus of Napier University, Edinburgh from February 22–July 3, 2001. Horizontal global and diffuse irradiance data were collected from the BF3. To enable a cross check, two Kipp and Zonen CM11 sensors, one with a shade ring, have also been installed beside the BF3 sensor on the same roof. These were used to give a reference measure of the horizontal global and diffuse irradiance. To evaluate the BF3 sunshine duration performance, the direct beam normal irradiance was calculated from the CM11 global and diffuse readings, and compared with a threshold of $120W.m−2$ to give sunshine presence according to the WMO definition. This was compared against the BF3 output, and also with data from two Campbell-Stokes sunshine recorders on the same site. The results show a stable performance on the part of the BF3 sensor for the measurement of horizontal global and diffuse irradiance. The global irradiance measured by the BF3 showed values 4.7% high, with a standard error of $16.5W.m−2$ compared to the Kipp and Zonen sensors. Diffuse values were 1.4% high with a standard error of $13.4W.m−2.$ The BF3 sunshine duration was within 2% of that calculated from the WMO definition over the study period, with a typical daily error of less than 20 min. This is well within the WMO requirements for a sunshine recorder. In comparison, the Campbell-Stokes recorders gave readings up to 7% different from the WMO values, with a typical daily error of almost an hour.

1.
Muneer
,
T.
,
1997
, “
Solar Radiation and Daylight Models for the Energy Efficient Design of Buildings
,”
Architectural Press
,
pp.
XXI–XXV
XXI–XXV
.
2.
Marion, B., 1998, “Multi-Pyranometer Array Design and Performance Summary,” Proc. of 1998 American Solar Energy Annual Conf., Albuquerque, NM, June 14–17, 1998, pp. 523–528.
3.
Delta-T Devices Ltd., 2002, User Manual for Sunshine Sensor Type BF3, Appendix A.
4.
Drummond
,
A. J.
,
1956
, “
On the Measurement of Sky Radiation
,”
Arch. Meteorol., Geophys. Bioklimatol., Ser. B
,
7
, pp.
413
436
.
5.
World Meteorological Organization, 1996, Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation, Sixth Edition, Section 8.2. [PUBLISHER?]
6.
Steven
,
M. D.
, and
Unsworth
,
M. H.
,
1980
, “
Shade-Ring Corrections for Pyranometer Measurements of Diffuse Solar Radiation From Cloudless Skies
,”
Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc.
,
106
, pp.
865
872
.
7.
Steven
,
M. D.
,
1983
, “
,”
Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc.
,
110
, pp.
261
270
.
8.
Vartiainen
,
E.
,
1998
, “
An Anisotropic Shadow Ring Correction Method for the Horizontal Diffuse Irradiance Measurements
,”
Renewable Energy
,
17
, pp.
311
317
.
9.
Ineichen
,
P.
,
Gremaud
,
J. M.
,
Guisan
,
O.
, and
Mermoud
,
A.
,
1984
, “
Study of the Corrective Factor Involved When Measuring the Diffuse Solar Radiationby Using the Ring Method
,”
Sol. Energy
,
32
, pp.
585
585
.
10.
Kasten, F., Dehne, K., and Brettschneider, W., 1983, “Improvement of Measurement of Diffuse Solar Radiation,” Solar Radiation Data Series F.2, pp. 221.
11.
Siren
,
K. E.
,
1987
, “
,”
Sol. Energy
,
39
, pp.
433
433
.
12.
LeBaron
,
B. A.
,
Michalsky
,
J. J.
, and
Perez
,
R.
,
1990
, “
A Simple Procedure for Correcting Shadowband Data for All Sky Conditions
,”
Sol. Energy
,
44
(
5
), pp.
249
256
.
13.
Muneer
,
T.
, and
Zhang
,
X.
,
2002
, “
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
124
(
1
), pp.
34
43
.
14.
Painter
,
H. E.
,
1981
, “
The Performance of a Campbell-Stokes Sunshine Recorder Compared With a Simultaneous Record of the Normal Incidence Irradiance
,”
Meteorological Magazine
,
110
, pp.
102
109
.