The effects of rotor scale and control system lag were examined for a variable-speed wind turbine. The scale study was performed on a teetered rotor with radii ranging between 22.5m and 33.75m. A 50% increase in radius more than doubled the rated power and annual energy capture. Using blade pitch to actively control fluctuating flatwise moments allowed for significant reductions in blade mass for a fixed fatigue life. A blade operated in closed-loop mode with a 33.75m radius weighed less than an open-loop blade with a 22.5m radius while maintaining the same fatigue life of $5×109$ rotations. Actuator lag reduced the effectiveness of the control system. However, 50% reductions in blade mass were possible even when implementing a relatively slow actuator with a 1 sec. time constant. Other practical limits on blade mass may include fatigue from start/stop cycles, non-uniform turbulence, tower wake effects, and wind shear. The more aggressive control systems were found to have high control accelerations near $60 deg/s2,$ which may be excessive for realistic actuators. Two time lags were introduced into the control system when mean wind speed was estimated in a rapidly changing wind environment. The first lag was the length of time needed to determine mean wind speed, and therefore the mean control settings. The second was the frequency at which these mean control settings were changed. Preliminary results indicate that quickly changing the mean settings (every 10 seconds) and using a moderate length mean averaging time (60 seconds) resulted in the longest fatigue life. It was discovered that large power fluctuations occurred during open-loop operation which could cause sizeable damage to a realistic turbine generator. These fluctuations are reduced by one half or more when aerodynamic loads are actively controlled.

1.
Eggers, A. J., Ashley, H., Rock, S. M., Chaney, K., and Digumarthi, R., 1995, “Aerodynamic Control of Fluctuating Loads on Teetered HAWT Rotors,” Proc. of 16th ASME Wind Energy Symp., Reno, NV, pp. 31–34.
2.
Eggers
,
A. J.
,
Ashley
,
H.
,
Rock
,
S. M.
, and
Chaney
,
K.
,
1996
, “
Effects of Blade Bending on Aerodynamic Control of Fluctuating Loads on Teetered HAWT Rotors
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
118
, No.
4
, pp.
239
245
.
3.
Eggers, A. J., Holley, W. E., Chaney, K., and Jennings, C., 1999, “Some Effects of Actuator Lag, Error Sensing, and Non-Uniform Turbulence on Blade Pitch Control of Fluctuating Aerodynamic Loads on HAWTs,” A Collection of the 1999 ASME Wind Energy Symp. Technical Papers Presented at the 37th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, pp. 104–109.
4.
Rock, S. M., Eggers, A. J., Moriarty, P. J., and Chaney, K., 2000, “Tradeoffs in Active Control of Aerodynamic Power and Loads on a HAWT Rotor,” A Collection of the 2000 ASME Wind Energy Symposium Technical Papers presented at the 38th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV.
5.
Hansen, A. C., 1997, Users Guide to the Wind Turbine Dynamics Computer Programs YawDyn and AeroDyn for ADAMS, Version 10.0, Mech. Eng. Dept., Univ. of Utah, June 23, Salt Lake City, UT.
6.
Mandell, J. F., 1993, “Fatigue of Composite Structures,” Session A—Applied Research, Fatigue/Materials, 1993 DOE/NREL Wind Energy Program Review Meeting, Golden, CO.
7.
Downing
,
S. D.
, and
Socie
,
D. F.
,
1982
, “
Simple Rainflow Counting Algorithms
,”
Int. J. Fatigue
,
4
, No.
1
, pp.
31
34
.
8.
Schluter, L. L., and Sutherland, H. J., 1991, User’s Guide for LIFE2’s Rainflow Counting Algorithm, Sandia Report SAND90-2259, Sandia National Laboratory, Albuquerque, NM.