A physical and thermodynamic model of space solar dynamic heat receivers employing solid-liquid phase change storage is developed. Generalized first and second law efficiencies are defined for cyclic operation. The solar heat receiver of NASA Glenn Research Center’s Solar Dynamic Ground Test Demonstration System is used to generate numerical results from startup through balanced-orbit (asymptotic) conditions. In addition, a parametric study is performed to assess changes in receiver first and second law efficiencies due to changes in various system measurable parameters. Results show that parametric changes in system parameters result in maximum deviations of the asymptotic first law efficiency of less than 5 percentage points. The maximum departures of the asymptotic second law efficiency are less than 4 percentage points. Although the NASA receiver configuration is not optimized for cyclic thermodynamic performance, the cycle-integrated first and second law efficiencies compare favorably with steady-state numerical and experimental first and second law efficiencies.

1.
Bejan, A., 1982, Entropy Generation Through Heat and Fluid Flow, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
2.
Bellecci
C.
, and
Conti
M.
,
1994
, “
Phase Change Thermal Storage: Entropy Production, Irreversibility, and Second Law Efficiency
,”
Solar Energy
, Vol.
53
, No.
2
, pp.
163
170
.
3.
Conti
M.
,
Bellecci
C.
, and
Charach
Ch.
,
1996
, “
Thermodynamic Design of a Phase Change Thermal Storage Module
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING
, Vol.
118
, pp.
89
96
.
4.
Ensworth, C., McKissock, D., and Mason, L., 1996, “Comparison of CCEP with GTD Test Data,” NASA Lewis Research Center, Internal Memorandum, Update #3, August.
5.
Hall, C. A., III, Glakpe, E. K., Cannon, J. N., and Kerslake, T. W., 1997, “Parametric Analysis of Cyclic Phase Change and Energy Storage in Solar Heat Receivers,” Proceedings, 32nd Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference (IECEC), American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, NY, Vol. 1, pp. 446–453.
6.
Hall
C. A.
,
Glakpe
E. K.
,
Cannon
J. N.
, and
Kerslake
T. W.
,
1998
, “
Modeling Cyclic Phase Change and Energy Storage in Solar Heat Receivers
,”
AIAA Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer
, Vol.
12
, No.
3
, pp.
406
413
.
7.
Hall, C. A., III, 1998, “Thermal State-of-Charge of Solar Heat Receivers for Space Solar Dynamic Power,” Ph.D. thesis, Howard University, Washington, DC.
8.
Howell, J. R., 1982, A Catalog of Radiation Configuration Factors, McGraw-Hill, New York.
9.
Jeffries, K. S. (ed.), 1993, “Solar Dynamic Power System Development for Space Station Freedom,” NASA Reference Publication 1310, July.
10.
Kays, W. M., and Crawford, M. E., 1993, Convective Heat and Mass Transfer, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
11.
Kerslake, T. W., and Ibrahim, M. B., 1990, “Two-Dimensional Model of a Space Station Freedom Thermal Energy Storage Canister,” NASA TM 103124 and Proceedings of the 25th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference (IECEC), Reno, NV.
12.
Mason, L., 1996, “Solar Dynamic Power System Test Results,” M.S. thesis, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio.
13.
Moynihan
P. I.
,
1986
, “
Example of Second-Law Efficiency of Solar-Thermal Cavity Receivers
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING
, Vol.
108
, pp.
67
74
.
14.
Shaltens
R. K.
, and
Mason
L. S.
,
1996
, “
Early Results from Solar Dynamic Space Power System Testing
,”
AIAA Journal of Propulsion and Power
, Vol.
12
, No.
5
, pp.
852
858
.
15.
Wilson, D. G., and Flanery, R. E., 1988, “Modeling Cyclic Melting and Freezing in a Hollow Metal Canister,” ORNL TM—6497.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.