A finite element vegetation model is presented for predicting the dynamic interaction of ground vehicles with vegetation. The purpose of the model is to predict ground vehicle mobility over vegetation covered terrains. The types of vegetation can range from small diameter highly compliant stems to large stiff trees. Those include various types of vegetation such as grass, crops, shrubs/bushes, small trees, and large trees. Mobility measures which can be predicted include maximum safe vehicle speed along a specified path, tire slip, and fuel consumption. The ground vehicles are modeled using high-fidelity multibody dynamics models. The vegetation stems are modeled using an arrangement of thin and/or thick beam finite elements. The thin beam model uses the torsional spring beam formulation for small flexible vegetation and only includes the axial and bending beam responses. The thick beam model includes axial, bending, torsional, and shear beam responses and uses a lumped parameter beam element which connects two rigid body type nodes. The vegetation model includes the effects of normal contact and friction with the vehicle and between stems, stem breaking, and stem aerodynamic forces.

The objective of this study is to validate a high-fidelity finite element tire model on hard pavement. In this model, the tire rubber matrix is modeled using locking-free brick elements with embedded thin beam elements along the tire’s circumference, meridian, and diagonals for modeling the tire’s reinforcements (belt, ply and bead). The internal air pressure is applied as a distributed force on the inner surface of the brick elements. Frictional contact between the outer surface of the brick elements and the pavement is modeled using the penalty method along with an asperity based Coulomb friction model. In order to validate the tire model, a medium duty truck tire is modeled and the following response quantities are compared to experimental results: (1) normal load versus deflection at different tire pressures; (2) rolling resistance versus speed; (3) longitudinal force versus slip; (4) lateral force versus slip angle for different normal loads; and (5) self-aligning torque versus slip angle for different normal loads.