Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
NARROW
Format
Article Type
Conference Series
Subject Area
Topics
Date
Availability
1-2 of 2
Samit J. Pethe
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Proceedings Papers
Proc. ASME. NAWTEC20, 20th Annual North American Waste-to-Energy Conference, 185-197, April 23–25, 2012
Paper No: NAWTEC20-7003
Abstract
Wheelabrator Technologies Inc. (WTI) operates a waste-to-energy facility in Portsmouth, Virginia. At full capacity, a total of 2,000 tons/day of refuse derived fuel (RDF) can be fired in four identical boilers to generate a total of 600,000 lb/hr of steam and 60 MW of electricity. The boilers were originally designed to co-fire RDF and coal; however, coal burning capability was removed a few years after commissioning. The plant provides all of the process/heating steam and the majority of the electrical power to the nearby Norfolk Naval Shipyard. Historically, the boilers had not been able to reliably achieve carbon monoxide (CO) emissions compliance. CO emissions experienced during normal boiler operation would be more than twice the mandated emission limit. WTI’s goal was to improve the boilers’ CO emissions performance while achieving sustained boiler operation at higher steam generation and RDF firing rates. WTI contracted Jansen Combustion and Boiler Technologies, Inc. (JANSEN) to evaluate the operation of the boilers, to assess the overall feasibility of meeting WTI’s goals, and to develop design concepts to overcome boiler limitations. The project was initiated by an engineering site visit where boiler operating data was collected and evaluated to develop a baseline of boiler operation. Current and new combustion system arrangements were evaluated with Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) modeling. The results confirmed that the root cause of the poor CO emissions performance was the inadequate penetration and mixing of the original overfire air (OFA) system (comprised of multiple rows of small ports on the front and rear furnace walls). CFD modeling also showed increased CO emissions to result from non-uniform RDF delivery profiles generated by the original fuel distributors that were installed at a high elevation over the grate. Modeling of the furnace with larger and fewer OFA nozzles placed on the side walls in an interlaced pattern, and the installation of “new-style” RDF distributors at a lower elevation where the boiler’s original coal distributors formerly were located was shown to significantly improve CO burnout. From December 2010 to May 2011, the new combustion systems were installed on all four boilers. Subsequent testing has shown that CO levels have been lowered by more than 70% and boiler availability has been significantly improved. Nitrogen oxides (NO x ) emissions, although slightly higher following the upgrade, are still within the NO x compliance limit. This paper describes the process that led to a successful project, including: data collection and analyses, CFD modeling, equipment design and supply, operator training, and start-up assistance.
Proceedings Papers
Proc. ASME. NAWTEC17, 17th Annual North American Waste-to-Energy Conference, 89-100, May 18–20, 2009
Paper No: NAWTEC17-2373
Abstract
Great River Energy operates a waste-to-energy plant in Elk River, Minnesota. The plant burns 850 tons per day of refuse derived fuel (RDF) in three boilers, and its three steam turbines can produce 32 MW of electricity. In the largest of the three units, the No. 3 Boiler, steam generation was restricted by carbon monoxide (CO) and nitrogen oxides (NO x ) emission limits. The plant had an interest in improving the combustion performance of the unit, thereby allowing higher average RDF firing rates while staying within emissions compliance. The project was initiated by an engineering site visit and evaluation. The boiler had a history of unstable burning on the stoker grate, which required periodic natural gas co-firing to reduce CO levels. As an outcome to the evaluation, it was decided to install a new overfire air (OFA) system to improve burnout of combustible gases above the grate. Current and new OFA arrangements were evaluated via Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) modeling. The results illustrated the limitations of the original OFA system (comprised of multiple rows of small OFA ports on the front and rear furnace walls), which generated inadequate mixing of air and combustible gases in the middle of the boiler. The modeling illustrated the advantages of large and fewer OFA nozzles placed on the side walls in an interlaced pattern, a configuration that has given excellent performance on over 45 biomass-fired boilers of similar design upgraded by Jansen Combustion and Boiler Technologies, Inc. (JANSEN). Installation of the new OFA system was completed in April of 2008. Subsequent testing of the No. 3 Boiler showed that it could reliably meet the state emission levels for CO and NO x (200 ppm and 250 ppm, respectively, corrected to 7% dry flue gas oxygen) while generating 24% more steam than a representative five month period prior to the upgrade. This paper describes the elements that led to a successful project, including: data collection, engineering analyses, CFD modeling, system design, equipment supply, installation, operator training, and startup assistance.