Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
NARROW
Format
Article Type
Conference Series
Subject Area
Topics
Date
Availability
1-1 of 1
Mark S. Ewing
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Proceedings Papers
Proc. ASME. NCAD2012, ASME 2012 Noise Control and Acoustics Division Conference, 441-452, August 19–22, 2012
Paper No: NCAD2012-1188
Abstract
For experimental determination of structural loss factor with mechanical excitation, the excitation location — i.e. “where to excite?” — and sensor placement — i.e. “where to measure?” — are quintessential considerations. For a highly-damped panel a significant portion is not experiencing reverberant field conditions, especially in higher frequency bands. That is, localized disturbances “die-out” before they can reflect off boundaries. As energy flows away from the excitation point, the energy the level in the direct field is higher than elsewhere, thereby resulting in higher response levels. Since the level of response is inversely proportional to damping, the loss factor predicted inside the direct field is underestimated. The size of direct field is proportional to frequency and loss factor. Therefore, for a highly damped and/or small plate, loss factor estimation based on randomly positioned accelerometers—which have a higher probability of being inside the direct field—will tend to underestimate damping.