1-9 of 9
M. J. Rosenfeld
Close
Save search
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Proceedings Papers

Power Spectral Density Analysis of Pipeline Pressures for Probabilistic Assessment

M. J. Rosenfeld, Benjamin Zand, Adam Steiner
Proc. ASME. IPC2020, Volume 1: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity, V001T03A076, September 28–30, 2020
Paper No: IPC2020-9587
https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2020-9587
View Paper titled, Power Spectral Density Analysis of Pipeline Pressures for Probabilistic Assessment
Open the PDF for Power Spectral Density Analysis of Pipeline Pressures for Probabilistic Assessment in another window
Topics: Pipelines, Spectral energy distribution, Pressure, Damage, Signals, Cycles, Errors, Computation, Fatigue analysis, Fatigue cracks
Proceedings Papers

Integrity Implications of Unintentionally Expanded Line Pipe

M. J. Rosenfeld
Proc. ASME. IPC2014, Volume 2: Pipeline Integrity Management, V002T06A002, September 29–October 3, 2014
Paper No: IPC2014-33177
https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2014-33177
View Paper titled, Integrity Implications of Unintentionally Expanded Line Pipe
Open the PDF for Integrity Implications of Unintentionally Expanded Line Pipe in another window
Topics: Pipes, Fracture (Materials), Fracture (Process), Hydrostatic testing, Manufacturing, Pipeline construction, Pipeline integrity, Pressure, Pressure testing, Stress
Proceedings Papers

Analysis of Pipe Expansion Associated With Field Hydrostatic Testing

Stephen C. Rapp, Dimitris Dimopoulos, Vassilis Gotsis, William Lamberth, M. J. Rosenfeld
Proc. ASME. IPC2010, 2010 8th International Pipeline Conference, Volume 2, 179-185, September 27–October 1, 2010
Paper No: IPC2010-31666
https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2010-31666
View Paper titled, Analysis of Pipe Expansion Associated With Field Hydrostatic Testing
Open the PDF for Analysis of Pipe Expansion Associated With Field Hydrostatic Testing in another window
Topics: Hydrostatic testing, Pipes, Yield strength, Stress, Inspection, Pipeline construction, Pipelines, Statistical analysis
Proceedings Papers

A Synthesized Approach to Pressure Reduction for Investigating Mechanical Damage

M. J. Rosenfeld
Proc. ASME. IPC2010, 2010 8th International Pipeline Conference, Volume 3, 359-367, September 27–October 1, 2010
Paper No: IPC2010-31245
https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2010-31245
View Paper titled, A Synthesized Approach to Pressure Reduction for Investigating Mechanical Damage
Open the PDF for A Synthesized Approach to Pressure Reduction for Investigating Mechanical Damage in another window
Topics: Damage, Pressure, Pipelines, Inspection, Rocks
Proceedings Papers

Is the 80% Leak Criterion Always Appropriate?

Harvey Haines, Rick McNealy, M. J. Rosenfeld
Proc. ASME. IPC2010, 2010 8th International Pipeline Conference, Volume 1, 711-717, September 27–October 1, 2010
Paper No: IPC2010-31483
https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2010-31483
View Paper titled, Is the 80% Leak Criterion Always Appropriate?
Open the PDF for Is the 80% Leak Criterion Always Appropriate? in another window
Topics: Corrosion, Ditches, Errors, Leakage, Metals, Natural gas distribution, Pipelines, Pipes, Pressure, Wall thickness
Proceedings Papers

Basis of the New Criteria in ASME B31.8 for Prioritization and Repair of Mechanical Damage

M. J. Rosenfeld, John W. Pepper, Keith Leewis
Proc. ASME. IPC2002, 4th International Pipeline Conference, Parts A and B, 647-658, September 29–October 3, 2002
Paper No: IPC2002-27122
https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2002-27122
View Paper titled, Basis of the New Criteria in ASME B31.8 for Prioritization and Repair of Mechanical Damage
Open the PDF for Basis of the New Criteria in ASME B31.8 for Prioritization and Repair of Mechanical Damage in another window
Topics: Damage, Maintenance, Corrosion, Deformation, Natural gas distribution, Pipelines, Pipes, Safety
Proceedings Papers

Development of Acceptance Criteria for Mild Ripples in Pipeline Field Bends

M. J. Rosenfeld, James D. Hart, Nasir Zulfiqar, Richard W. Gailing
Proc. ASME. IPC2002, 4th International Pipeline Conference, Parts A and B, 659-672, September 29–October 3, 2002
Paper No: IPC2002-27124
https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2002-27124
View Paper titled, Development of Acceptance Criteria for Mild Ripples in Pipeline Field Bends
Open the PDF for Development of Acceptance Criteria for Mild Ripples in Pipeline Field Bends in another window
Topics: Acceptance criteria, Pipelines, Construction, Engineering standards, Fatigue damage, Finite element analysis, Pipes, Pressure, Regulations, Service life (Equipment)
Proceedings Papers

Evaluation of End Fillet Details for Hot Tap Fittings

M. J. Rosenfeld, Rick Baldwin
Proc. ASME. IPC2002, 4th International Pipeline Conference, Parts A and B, 341-348, September 29–October 3, 2002
Paper No: IPC2002-27123
https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2002-27123
View Paper titled, Evaluation of End Fillet Details for Hot Tap Fittings
Open the PDF for Evaluation of End Fillet Details for Hot Tap Fittings in another window
Topics: Fittings, ASME Standards, Failure, Dimensions, Pipes, Stress
Proceedings Papers

Deterministic Assessment of Minor Mechanical Damage on Pipelines

M. J. Rosenfeld, Alan Beckett, Bhaskar Neogi, U. J. Baskurt, Elden Johnson
Proc. ASME. IPC2006, Volume 2: Integrity Management; Poster Session; Student Paper Competition, 779-789, September 25–29, 2006
Paper No: IPC2006-10513
https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2006-10513
View Paper titled, Deterministic Assessment of Minor Mechanical Damage on Pipelines
Open the PDF for Deterministic Assessment of Minor Mechanical Damage on Pipelines in another window
Topics: Damage, Pipelines, Dimensions, Fracture (Materials), Service life (Equipment), Cycles, Deformation, Fatigue, Inspection, Materials properties