Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
NARROW
Format
Journal
Article Type
Conference Series
Subject Area
Topics
Date
Availability
1-3 of 3
David R. Dowling
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Journal Articles
Freeman Scholar Review: Passive and Active Skin-Friction Drag Reduction in Turbulent Boundary Layers
Journal:
Journal of Fluids Engineering
Article Type: Research-Article
J. Fluids Eng. September 2016, 138(9): 091104.
Paper No: FE-15-1228
Published Online: June 2, 2016
Abstract
A variety of skin-friction drag reduction (FDR) methods for turbulent boundary layer (TBL) flows are reviewed. Both passive and active methods of drag reduction are discussed, along with a review of the fundamental processes responsible for friction drag and FDR. Particular emphasis is given to methods that are applicable to external hydrodynamic flows where additives are diluted by boundary layer entrainment. The methods reviewed include those based on engineered surfaces (riblets, large eddy breakup devices (LEBUs), and superhydrophobic surfaces (SHS)), those based on additives (polymer injection and gas injection), and those based on morphological alterations in the boundary layer flow (air layers and partial cavity formation). A common theme for all methods is their disruption of one or more of the underlying physical processes responsible for the production of skin-friction drag in a TBL. Opportunities and challenges for practical implementation of FDR techniques are also discussed.
Proceedings Papers
Proc. ASME. NCAD2008, ASME 2008 Noise Control and Acoustics Division Conference, 53-57, July 28–30, 2008
Paper No: NCAD2008-73021
Abstract
An acoustic localization method is applied in a reverberant environment to locate the sources of discrete sounds having unknown timing and waveform. In particular, the localization method is applied to study low event rate cavitation in a vortical flow in a water-tunnel test-section with characteristic cross section dimension of 0.3 m. The primary frequency and bandwidth of the acoustic pulses from the small isolated cavitation bubbles are 10 kHz and 200 kHz respectively, and the measured pulse duration is ∼15–20 micro-seconds. The localization method involves using an array of receiving hydrophones to record the cavitation sound pulses. These hydrophone recordings, which include direct-path signal, reflected path signal, and noise, are time windowed and cross-correlated to obtain direct-path arrival-time differences. These arrival time differences are used in conjunction with a simple ray-based acoustic model to estimate the source location in three dimensions via a robust Monte-Carlo routine. The ratio of the primary-frequency wavelength to the water-tunnel cross-section dimension is ∼1/2. Consequently the time-windowing is tight; only 1 to 1.5 center-frequency cycles at the beginning of a signal pulse are readily useful for localization purposes. The remainder of the signal is contaminated by reflections and is not used in the present effort. To check and validate the results of the acoustic method, two-camera high-speed video data was taken synchronously with the acoustic data for 53 cavitation events. The acoustic localization scheme provided an unambiguous location estimate for all 53 cavitation bubbles. The average distance between the optical and acoustic measurement of the bubble location was 18.4 mm, or ∼1/8 of the wavelength of the primary signal frequency.
Proceedings Papers
Proc. ASME. FEDSM2003, Volume 1: Fora, Parts A, B, C, and D, 683-695, July 6–10, 2003
Paper No: FEDSM2003-45649
Abstract
This paper presents the preliminary results from a friction drag reduction experiment conducted at high Reynolds numbers. The experiments were conducted in two phases at the U. S. Navy’s William B. Morgan Large Cavitation Channel (LCC) in Memphis, TN on a flat, hydraulically smooth plate (12.9 meters long by 3.0 meters wide by 0.18 meters thick) at flow speeds ranging from 0.5 to 20 m/s. The employed drag reduction technique involved the injection of microbubbles into the boundary from a line source over a range of injection flow rates from 100 to 800 scfm. These results include mean velocity data and spatially averaged shear stress data acquired in the single-phase flow, as well as spatially averaged shear stress data, bubble images, and void fraction measurements made in the bubble-injected flow.