This paper describes some of the requirements for bearing dampers to be used in an aircraft engine and briefly discusses the pros and cons of various types of dampers that were considered as candidates for active control in aircraft engines. A disk type of electrorheological (ER) damper was chosen for further study and testing. The paper explains how and why the choice was made. For evaluating potential applications to aircraft engines, an experimental development engine (XTE-45) was used as an example for this study. Like most real aircraft engines, the XTE-45 ran through more than one critical speed in its operating speed range. There are some speeds where damping is desirable and other speeds where it is not. Thus, the concept of a damper with controllable forces appears attractive. The desired equivalent viscous damping at the critical speeds along with the available size envelope were two of the major criteria used for comparing the dampers. Most previous investigators have considered the ER damper to produce a purely Coulomb type of damping force and this was the assumption used by the present authors in this study. It is shown in a companion paper (Vance and San Andres, 1999), however, that a purely Coulomb type of friction cannot restrain the peak vibration amplitudes at rotordynamic critical speeds and that the equivalent viscous damping for rotordynamics is different from the value derived by previous investigators for planar vibration. Control laws for Coulomb damping are derived in Vance and San Andres, (1999) to achieve minimum rotor vibration amplitudes in a test rig while avoiding large bearing forces over a speed range that includes a critical speed. The type of control scheme required and its effectiveness was another criterion used for comparing the dampers in this paper.

Selection criteria and design evaluations of several types of bearing dampers with active control for application to aircraft engines were described in a companion paper (Vance, Ying, and Nikolajsen, 1999). A disk type electrorheological (ER) damper was chosen for further study and testing. The results of the tests and the final conclusions of the study are described in this paper. Experimental results including stiffness and damping coefficients are presented for the ER bearing damper with two types of ER fluid, 350 CS and 10 CS (centistokes) viscosity. The vibration attenuation performance of the ER damper was measured on a rotordynamic test rig in the form of free vibration decay, rotor orbits, and runup unbalance responses. The results show that the ER fluid with lower viscosity has the better characteristics for rotordynamic applications. It was found that ER fluids produce both Coulomb and viscous damping. If only the damping is considered, the Coulomb type is less desirable, but with active control it can also achieve control of rotor stiffness as analyzed in Vance and San Andres (1999). A feedback control system was developed and applied to the ER damper with the objective of improving the overall rotordynamic performance of the rotor bearing system, considering both vibration amplitudes and dynamic bearing forces. A “bang-bang” (on and off) simple control logic was found to work better in practice than more sophisticated schemes. The measured runup responses of the rotor-bearing system with this control approximated the desired vibration response curves fairly well. The tests highlighted some of the practical considerations that would be important for aircraft engine applications, such as the ER fluid limitations, the electrical power supply requirements, the electrical insulation requirements, the nonlinear relationship between the voltage and the damping, and the relative benefits of active control. It is concluded that active control of bearing damping is probably not a practical improvement over the passive squeeze film dampers currently used in most aircraft gas turbine engines.