Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Conference Volume
- Paper No
NARROW
Format
Subjects
eBook Series
Article Type
Conference Series
Subject Area
Topics
Date
Availability
1-13 of 13
D. Keith Morton
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
eBook Chapter
Series: eBooks
Publisher: ASME Press
Published: 2020
Abstract
: This chapter reflects the 2015 Edition of Section III, Division 3 of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel (BPV) Code. Division 3 covers all “construction” aspects of the containment of nuclear transportation packagings, including administrative requirements, material selection, material qualification, design, fabrication, examination, inspection, testing, quality assurance, and documentation. The current scope for Division 3 includes the containments for both transportation and storage and the internal support structures for both containments. The chapter first traces the history of the ASME Subgroup NUPACK, and outlines the scope and requirements of Division 3. It then discusses the system of loading classification and the design rules based on these loadings. Division 3 loadings include Design Loadings (Design Pressure, Design Temperature, and Design Mechanical Loadings), Operating Loadings (normal, off-normal, and accident), and Test Loadings (from pressure and leak tests). The chapter also provides a brief review of the ASME stress evaluations and the associated stress acceptance criteria. Code text organization of Division 3 is then considered. The ASME BPV Code Section III, Division 3 is currently divided into three subsections: WA, General Requirements; WB, Class TC Containments; and WC, Class SC Storage Containments. Discussions also include the incorporation of strain-based acceptance criteria, and the current activities in Division 3 such as the development of new subsection WD addressing internal support structures. The chapter concludes with a summary of suggested enhancements for the future in the scope for Division 3.
eBook Chapter
Series: eBooks
Publisher: ASME Press
Published: 2020
Abstract
: This chapter provides commentary on a new division under Section III of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel (BPV) Code. This Division 5 was first published as part of the 2011 Addenda to the 2010 Edition of the BPV Code. The chapter provides information on the scope and need for Division 5, the structure of Division 5, where the rules originated, the basis for the elevated temperature rules specified in Division 5, the various changes made in finalizing Division 5, and the future near-term and long-term expectations for Division 5 development. It reflects the 2015 Edition of Division 5. Division 5 identifies rules for high temperature reactors (HTRs) based on only two classifications, Class A for safety-related components and Class B for non-safety related but with special treatment components. It contains general requirements for both metals and graphite in Subsection HA, Subpart A and Subpart B, respectively. Rules for Class A metallic pressure boundary components, Class B metallic pressure boundary components, and Class A core support structures at both low temperature conditions (under Subpart A) and elevated temperature conditions (under Subpart B) are contained in Subsections HB, HC, and HG, respectively. Rules for Class A and B metallic supports are contained in Subsection NF, Subpart A. Finally, new rules for nonmetallic core support structures (graphite) are contained in Subsection HH, Subpart A. Consistent with current Code practice, the primary concern of Division 5 is the integrity of the components under design, operating conditions (including normal, upset, emergency, and faulted), and test conditions. Division 5 covers all construction aspects of these components, including administrative requirements, material selection and qualification, design, fabrication, examination, inspection, testing, quality assurance, and documentation.
eBook Chapter
eBook Chapter
Publisher: ASME Press
Published: 2018
ISBN: 9780791861301
eBook Chapter
Publisher: ASME Press
Published: 2012
ISBN: 9780791859865
Abstract
In 1997, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) issued the initial version of Division 3 of Section III of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel (BPV) Code. Prior to the publication of Division 3, Section III had only two divisions: Division 1 for metal construction and Division 2 for concrete construction. Division 3 was added to address the containments of nuclear transportation packagings. Hence, the ASME Subgroup responsible for Division 3 has been commonly referred to as “Subgroup NUPACK” even though its official name is the Subgroup on Containment Systems for Spent Fuel and High-Level Waste Transport Packagings. Consistent with current ASME BPV Code practice, the concern of this Division is primarily the integrity of the containment under design, operating, and test conditions. In particular, the structural and leak integrity of the containment is the focus of the Division 3 rules. Subgroup NUPACK is also concerned with aspects of containment closure functionality because the potential for leakage is a key consideration in the containment function of a transport cask or storage containment. Division 3 covers all “construction” aspects of the containment, which is ASME BPV Code terminology that includes administrative requirements, material selection, material qualification, design, fabrication, examination, inspection, testing, quality assurance, and documentation.
eBook Chapter
Publisher: ASME Press
Published: 2012
ISBN: 9780791859865
Abstract
This chapter provides commentary on a new division under Section III of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel (BPV) Code. This new Division 5 has an issuance date of November 1, 2011 and is part of the 2010 Edition of the BPV Code. This chapter provides information on the scope and need for Division 5, the structure of Division 5, where the rules originated, the various changes made in finalizing Division 5, and the future near-term and long-term expectations for Division 5 development.
eBook Chapter
Publisher: ASME Press
Published: 2011
ISBN: 9780791859551
Abstract
In 1999, an international collaborative initiative for the development of advanced (Generation IV) reactors was started. The idea behind this effort was to bring nuclear energy closer to the needs of sustainability, to increase proliferation resistance, and to support concepts able to produce energy (both electricity and process heat) at competitive costs. Six reactor concepts were chosen for further development: the sodium fast reactor (SFR), the very-high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (VHTR), the lead or lead-bismuth cooled liquid metal reactor, the helium gas-cooled fast reactor, the molten salt reactor (MSR), and the super critical water reactor. In view of sustainability, the Generation IV reactors should not only have superior fuel cycles to minimize nuclear waste, but they should also be able to produce process heat or steam for hydrogen production, synthetic fuels, refinery processes, and other commercial uses. These reactor types were described in the 2002 Generation IV roadmap. Different projects around the world have been started since that time. The most advanced efforts are with reactors where production experience already existed. These reactors include the SFR and the VHTR. The other reactor types are still more in a design concept phase. This chapter briefly describes the six Generation IV concepts and then provides additional details, focusing on the two near-term viable Generation IV concepts. The current status of the applicable international projects is then summarized. These new technologies have also created remarkable demands on materials compared with light water reactors (LWRs). Higher temperatures, higher neutron doses, environments very different from water, and design lives of 60 years present a real engineering challenge. These new demands have led to many exciting research activities and to new Codes and Standards developments, which are summarized in the final sections of this chapter.
Proceedings Papers
Proc. ASME. PVP2008, Volume 1: Codes and Standards, 261-265, July 27–31, 2008
Paper No: PVP2008-61576
Abstract
Current activities of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Section III Subgroup on Containment Systems for Spent Fuel and High-Level Waste Transport Packagings (also known as Subgroup NUPACK) are reviewed with emphasis on the recent revision of Subsection WB (transportation containments). Also, brief insights on new proposals for the development of rules for internal support structures (e.g., spent fuel baskets) and for a strain-based acceptance criteria are provided.
eBook Chapter
Publisher: ASME Press
Published: 2009
ISBN: 9780791802694
Abstract
In Chapter 15, authored by D. Keith Morton and D. Wayne Lewis, a commentary is provided regarding the containments used for the transportation and storage packaging of spent fuel and high-level radioactive material and waste. John D. Stevenson was the author of this chapter for the earlier two editions of this publication. However, this is a complete rewrite of the Chapter, including a slightly different Chapter title. In 1997, ASME issued the initial version of Division 3 of Section III. Before the publication of Division 3, Section III, the Section applicable to the construction of nuclear pressure-retaining components and supports had only two divisions: Division 1, for metal construction, and Division 2, for concrete construction. Division 3 was added to cover the containments of packaging for nuclear materials. Currently, the scope for Division 3 is limited to transportation and storage containments for only the most hazardous radioactive materials—namely, spent fuel and other highly radioactive materials, such as high-level waste. Division 3 contains three published subsections: Subsection WA providing general requirements, Subsection WB addressing rules for transportation containments, and Subsection WC addressing storage containment rules. Under active development is Subsection WD, which will provide the construction rules applicable to internal support structures (baskets) for the transportation and storage containments covered by Subsections WB and WC. Consistent with current Code practice, the primary concern of Division 3 is the integrity of these containments under design, operating conditions (including normal, off-normal, and accident), and test conditions. In particular, the structural and leak-integrity of these containments is the focus of the ASME B&PV Code rules. Division 3 is also concerned with certain aspects of containment-closure functionality because of the potential for leakage, which is a key consideration in the containment function. Division 3 covers all construction aspects of the containment, including administrative requirements, material selection, material qualification, design, fabrication, examination, inspection, testing, quality assurance, and documentation.
Proceedings Papers
Proc. ASME. PVP2002, Transportation, Storage, and Disposal of Radioactive Materials, 49-54, August 5–9, 2002
Paper No: PVP2002-1613
Abstract
The Department of Energy (DOE) has developed a set of containers for the handling, interim storage, transportation, and disposal in the national repository of DOE spent nuclear fuel (SNF). This container design, referred to as the standardized DOE SNF canister or standardized canister, was developed by the Department’s National Spent Nuclear Fuel Program (NSNFP) working in conjunction with the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) and the DOE spent fuel sites. This canister had to have a standardized design yet be capable of accepting virtually all of the DOE SNF, be placed in a variety of storage and transportation systems, and still be acceptable to the repository. Since specific design details regarding the storage, transportation, and repository disposal of DOE SNF were not finalized, the NSNFP recognized the necessity to specify a complete DOE SNF canister design. This allowed other evaluations of canister performance and design to proceed as well as providing standardized canister users adequate information to proceed with their work. This paper is an update of a paper [1] presented to the 1999 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Pressure Vessels and Piping (PVP) Conference. It discusses recent progress achieved in various areas to enhance acceptance of this canister not only by the DOE complex but also fabricators and regulatory agencies.
Proceedings Papers
Proc. ASME. PVP2004, Transportation, Storage, and Disposal of Radioactive Materials, 197-201, July 25–29, 2004
Paper No: PVP2004-2802
Abstract
The Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) developed an apparatus capable of supporting a wide variety of material studies and distinct component testing under impact loads. Material studies include material (metals, plastics, concrete, etc.) response due to bending, tension, shear, and compression loadings at elevated strain rates. Similar testing can also be performed on any distinct component fitting within the apparatus impact loading volume. This apparatus is referred to as the Impact Test Machine (ITM). The ITM is initially being used by the Department of Energy (DOE) to test 304L and 316L stainless steel tensile test specimens at various strain rates for comparison to static properties. The goal is to ultimately develop true stress-strain curves at various strain rates and temperatures for these steels. These curves can then be used in analytical simulations to more accurately predict the deformation and resulting material straining in spent nuclear fuel (SNF) containers, canisters, and casks under accidental drop events (Ref: Snow 1999, 2000). Test results can also help determine a basis for establishing allowable strain limits for these large deformation, inelastic events. This material investigation is currently in an early stage of development. This paper will discuss the results of tensile tests performed on test specimens employed in the formulation of the test process and initial checkout of the ITM.
Proceedings Papers
Proc. ASME. PVP2005, Volume 7: Operations, Applications, and Components, 473-481, July 17–21, 2005
Paper No: PVP2005-71134
Abstract
The National Spent Nuclear Fuel Program (NSNFP) at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) prepared four representative Department of Energy (DOE) spent nuclear fuel (SNF) canisters for the purpose of drop testing. The first two canisters represented a modified 24-inch diameter standardized DOE SNF canister and the second two canisters represented the Hanford Multi-Canister Overpack (MCO). The modified canisters and internals were constructed and assembled at the INEEL. The MCO internal weights were fabricated at the INEEL and assembled into two MCOs at Hanford and later shipped to the INEEL for drop test preparation. Drop testing of these four canisters was completed in August 2004 at Sandia National Laboratories. The modified canisters were dropped from 30 feet onto a flat, essentially unyielding surface, with the canisters oriented at 45 degrees and 70 degrees off-vertical at impact. One representative MCO was dropped from 23 feet onto the same flat surface, oriented vertically at impact. The second representative MCO was dropped onto the flat surface from 2 feet oriented at 60 degrees off-vertical. These drop heights and orientations were chosen to meet or exceed the Yucca Mountain repository drop criteria. This paper discusses the comparison of deformations between the actual dropped canisters and those predicted by pre-drop and limited post-drop finite element evaluations performed using ABAQUS/Explicit. Post-drop containment of all four canisters, demonstrated by way of helium leak testing, is also discussed.
Proceedings Papers
Proc. ASME. PVP2006-ICPVT-11, Volume 7: Operations, Applications, and Components, 509-515, July 23–27, 2006
Paper No: PVP2006-ICPVT-11-93161
Abstract
Stainless steels are used for the construction of numerous spent nuclear fuel or radioactive material containers that may be subjected to high strains and moderate strain rates during accidental drop events. Mechanical characteristics of these materials under dynamic (impact) loads in the strain rate range of concern are not well documented. However, two previous papers [1, 2] reported on impact tensile testing and analysis results performed at the Idaho National Laboratory using 304L and 316L stainless steel specimens that began the investigation of these characteristics. The goal of the work presented herein is to: (1) add the results of additional tensile impact testing for 304L stainless steel specimens, and (2) show that the application of the strain rate-dependent material curves (determined through that tensile impact testing) to specimens designed to respond in bending during impact loading would yield accurate deformation and strain predictions.