Abstract

The objective of this work was to better understand pedestrians' understanding, trust, comfort, and acceptance of autonomous vehicle (AV) external human-machine interfaces (eHMIs). A link between mechanical engineering (i.e., automotive engineering) and civil engineering (i.e., multimodal transportation systems) is necessary to understand the effectiveness of varying AV-to-human communication strategies. Using a within-subject experiment design, 47 participants interacted with AVs possessing one of four eHMIs in a virtual reality (VR) environment. We administered a Likert scale survey to measure participants' perceptions of the eHMIs and used ordinal logistic regressions to analyze the results. We also accounted for participants' gender and stated interest in AVs, novel contributions to this field of research. The presence of an eHMI was found to improve participants' perceptions of AVs. Although females generally reported higher levels of understanding, trust, comfort, and acceptance, males' scores increased more significantly with the introduction of an eHMI. Text eHMIs outperformed nontextual interfaces, with participants noting the best perceptions with the text eHMI located on the AV's grille. Participants' understanding and identification of right-of-way (ROW) were most improved by the eHMIs while trust and comfort were most impacted by the participants' stated interest in AVs. Acceptance had little response to the eHMIs or stated AV interest and gender had little impact in the statistical models. This research supports the development of a standard, uniform AV-pedestrian communication strategy and strengthens the connection between humans and AVs.

References

1.
Anderson
,
J. M.
,
Kalra
,
N.
,
Stanley
,
K. D.
,
Sorensen
,
P.
,
Samaras
,
C.
, and
Oluwatola
,
T. A.
,
2014
, “Autonomous Vehicle Technology: How to Best Realize Its Social Benefits,”
RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA
, epub.https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9755.html
2.
Eugensson
,
A.
,
Brännström
,
M.
,
Frasher
,
D.
,
Rothoff
,
M.
, and
Solyom
,
S.
,
2013
, “
Environmental, Safety Legal and Societal Implications of Autonomous Driving Systems
,”
International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV)
,
Seoul, South Korea
, May 27, Vol. 334, Paper No. 13–0467.https://wwwesv.nhtsa.dot.gov/Proceedings/23/files/23ESV-000467.PDF
3.
Fagnant
,
D. J.
, and
Kockelman
,
K.
,
2015
, “
Preparing a Nation for Autonomous Vehicles: Opportunities, Barriers and Policy Recommendations
,”
Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract.
,
77
, pp.
167
181
.10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.003
4.
Adnan
,
N.
,
Md Nordin
,
S.
,
Ariff bin Bahruddin
,
M.
, and
Ali
,
M.
,
2018
, “
How Trust Can Drive Forward the User Acceptance to the Technology? In-Vehicle Technology for Autonomous Vehicle
,”
Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Practice
,
118
, pp.
819
836
.10.1016/j.tra.2018.10.019
5.
Chandrayee
,
B.
, and
Singhal
,
M.
,
2016
, “
Trust Dynamics in Human Autonomous Vehicle Interaction: A Review of Trust Models
,”
Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA
.https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/SSS/SSS16/paper/view/12746
6.
Choi
,
J. K.
, and
Ji
,
Y. G.
,
2015
, “
Investigating the Importance of Trust on Adopting an Autonomous Vehicle
,”
Int. J. Human-Comput. Interaction
,
31
(
10
), pp.
692
702
.10.1080/10447318.2015.1070549
7.
Ekman
,
F.
,
Johansson
,
M.
, and
Sochor
,
J.
,
2016
, “
Creating Appropriate Trust for Autonomous Vehicle Systems: A Framework for HMI Design
,”
IEEE Trans. Human-Mach. Syst.
, 48(1), pp.
95
101
.10.1109/THMS.2017.2776209
8.
Hulse
,
L. M.
,
Xie
,
H.
, and
Galea
,
E. R.
,
2018
, “
Perceptions of Autonomous Vehicles: Relationships With Road Users, Risk, Gender and Age
,”
Saf. Sci.
,
102
, pp.
1
13
.10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.001
9.
Becker
,
F.
, and
Axhausen
,
K. W.
,
2017
, “
Literature Review on Surveys Investigating the Acceptance of Automated Vehicles
,”
Transportation
,
44
(
6
), pp.
1293
1306
.10.1007/s11116-017-9808-9
10.
Böckle
,
M.-P.
,
Brenden
,
A. P.
,
Klingegård
,
M.
,
Habibovic
,
A.
, and
Bout
,
M.
,
2017
, “
SAV2P: Exploring the Impact of an Interface for Shared Automated Vehicles on Pedestrians' Experience
,”
Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications Adjunct
, Oldensburg, Germany, Sept. 24, pp.
136
140
.
11.
Habibovic
,
A.
,
Lundgren
,
V. M.
,
Andersson
,
J.
,
Klingegård
,
M.
,
Lagström
,
T.
,
Sirkka
,
A.
,
Fagerlönn
,
J.
,
Edgren
,
C.
,
Fredriksson
,
R.
,
Krupenia
,
S.
,
Saluäär
,
D.
, and
Larsson
,
P.
,.
2018
, “
Communicating Intent of Automated Vehicles to Pedestrians
,”
Front. Psychol.
,
9
, p.
1336
.10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01336
12.
Habibovic
,
A.
,
Andersson
,
J.
,
Lundgren
,
V. M.
,
Klingegård
,
M.
,
Englund
,
C.
, and
Larsson
,
S.
,
2019
, “
External Vehicle Interfaces for Communication With Other Road Users
?,”
Road Vehicle Automation
,
5
,
Springer
,
Cham
, pp.
91
102
.
13.
Irshad
,
L.
,
Onan Demirel
,
H.
,
Tumer
,
I. Y.
, and
Brat
,
G.
,
2020
, “
Using Rio-Paris Flight 447 Crash to Assess Human Error and Failure Propagation Analysis Early in Design
,”
ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncert. Eng. Sys. Part B Mech. Eng.
,
6
(
1
), p. 011008. 10.1115/1.4044790
14.
Morais
,
C.
,
Moura
,
R.
,
Beer
,
M.
, and
Patelli
,
E.
,
2020
, “
Analysis and Estimation of Human Errors From Major Accident Investigation Reports
,”
ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncert. Eng. Sys. Part B Mech. Eng.
,
6
(
1
), p. 011014.10.1115/1.4044796
15.
Soria Zurita
,
N. F.
,
Stone
,
R. B.
,
Onan Demirel
,
H.
, and
Tumer
,
I. Y.
,
2020
, “
Identification of Human–System Interaction Errors During Early Design Stages Using a Functional Basis Framework
,”
ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncert. Eng. Sys. Part B Mech. Eng.
,
6
(
1
), p. 011005.10.1115/1.4044787
16.
Dresner
,
K. M.
, and
Stone
,
P.
,
2007
, “
Sharing the Road: Autonomous Vehicles Meet Human Drivers
,”
IJCAI
,
7
, pp.
1263
1268
.
17.
Levin
,
M. W.
, and
Boyles
,
S. D.
,
2015
, “
Effects of Autonomous Vehicle Ownership on Trip, Mode, and Route Choice
,”
Transp. Res. Rec.
,
2493
(
1
), pp.
29
38
.10.3141/2493-04
18.
Haboucha
,
C. J.
,
Ishaq
,
R.
, and
Shiftan
,
Y.
,
2017
, “
User Preferences Regarding Autonomous Vehicles
,”
Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol.
,
78
, pp.
37
49
.10.1016/j.trc.2017.01.010
19.
Bansal
,
P.
,
Kockelman
,
K. M.
, and
Singh
,
A.
,
2016
, “
Assessing Public Opinions of and Interest in New Vehicle Technologies: An Austin Perspective
,”
Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol.
,
67
, pp.
1
14
.10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.019
20.
Zmud
,
J.
,
Sener
,
I. N.
, and
Wagner
,
J.
,
2016
, “
Consumer Acceptance and Travel Behavior: Impacts of Automated Vehicles
,”
Texas A&M Transportation Institute
, College Station, TX, Report No. PRC 15-49 F.
21.
De Clercq
,
K.
,
Dietrich
,
A.
,
Núñez Velasco
,
J. P.
,
de Winter
,
J.
, and
Happee
,
R.
,
2019
, “
External Human-Machine Interfaces on Automated Vehicles: Effects on Pedestrian Crossing Decisions
,”
Human Factors
,
61
(
8
), pp.
1353
1370
.10.1177/0018720819836343
22.
Weber
,
F.
,
Chadowitz
,
R.
,
Schmidt
,
K.
,
Messerschmidt
,
J.
, and
Fuest
,
T.
,
2019
, “
Crossing the Street Across the Globe: A Study on the Effects of eHMI on Pedestrians in the US, Germany and China
,”
International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
,
Springer
,
Cham
, pp.
515
530
.
23.
Ford Media Center,
2017
, “Ford, Virginia Tech Go Undercover to Develop Signals That Enable Autonomous Vehicles to Communicate With People,”
Washington, DC
, Sept. 13, epub.https://media.ford.com/content/fordmedia/fna/us/en/news/2017/09/13/ford-virginia-techautonomous-vehicle-human-testing.html
24.
Grimm
,
D. K.
,
Kiefer
,
R. J.
,
Angell
,
L. S.
,
Deering
,
R. K.
, and
Green
,
C. A.
,
2012
, “
Vehicle to Entity Communication
.” “U.S. Patent,” 8,253,589, issued Aug. 28.
25.
Hillis
,
W. D.
,
Williams
,
K. I.
,
Tombrello
,
T. A.
,
Sarrett
,
J. W.
,
Khanlian
,
L. W.
,
Kaehler
,
A. L.
, and
Howe
,
R.
,
2016
, “
Communication Between Autonomous Vehicle and External Observers
.” “U.S. Patent,” 9,475,422. issued Oct. 25.
26.
Sweeney
,
M.
,
Pilarski
,
T.
,
Ross
,
W. P.
, and
Liu
,
C.
, “
Light Output System for a Self-Driving Vehicle
.” “U.S. Patent,” 10,160,378. issued Dec. 25,
2018
.
27.
Urmson
,
C. P.
,
Mahon
,
I. J.
,
Dolgov
,
D. A.
, and
Zhu
,
J.
,
2015
, “
Pedestrian Notifications
.” “U.S. Patent,” 9,196,164. issued Nov. 24.
28.
Bazilinskyy
,
P.
,
Dodou
,
D.
, and
De Winter
,
J.
,
2019
, “
Survey on eHMI Concepts: The Effect of Text, Color, and Perspective
,”
Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav.
,
67
, pp.
175
194
.10.1016/j.trf.2019.10.013
29.
Ackermann
,
C.
,
Beggiato
,
M.
,
Schubert
,
S.
, and
Krems
,
J. F.
,
2019
, “
An Experimental Study to Investigate Design and Assessment Criteria: What is Important for Communication Between Pedestrians and Automated Vehicles?
,”
Appl. Ergon.
,
75
, pp.
272
282
.10.1016/j.apergo.2018.11.002
30.
Merat
,
N.
,
Louw
,
T.
,
Madigan
,
R.
,
Wilbrink
,
M.
, and
Schieben
,
A.
,
2018
, “
What Externally Presented Information Do VRUs Require When Interacting With Fully Automated Road Transport Systems in Shared Space
,”
Accident Anal. Prev.
,
118
, pp.
244
252
.10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.018
31.
Zhang
,
J.
,
Vinkhuyzen
,
E.
, and
Cefkin
,
M.
,
2017
, “
Evaluation of an Autonomous Vehicle External Communication System Concept: A Survey Study
,”
International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics
,
Springer
,
Cham
, pp.
650
661
.
32.
Clamann
,
M.
,
Aubert
,
M.
, and
Cummings
,
M. L.
,
2017
, “
Evaluation of Vehicle-to-Pedestrian Communication Displays for Autonomous Vehicles
,” Transportation Research Board 96th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, Jan. 8, Report No. 17-02119.
33.
Troel-Madec
,
M.
,
Boissieux
,
L.
,
Borkoswki
,
S.
,
Vaufreydaz
,
D.
,
Alaimo
,
J.
,
Chatagnon
,
S.
, and
Spalanzani
,
A.
,
2019
, “
eHMI Positioning for Autonomous Vehicle/Pedestrians Interaction
,”
Proceedings of the 31st Conference on L'Interaction Homme-Machine: Adjunct
, pp.
1
8
.
34.
Balakrishnan
,
S.
,
Moridpour
,
S.
, and
Tay
,
R.
,
2019
, “
Sociodemographic Influences on Injury Severity in Truck-Vulnerable Road User Crashes
,”
ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst., Part A: Civ. Eng.
,
5
(
4
), p.
04019015
.10.1061/AJRUA6.0001023
35.
Ahmed
,
S.
, and
Onan Demirel
,
H.
,
2020
, “
A Framework to Assess Human Performance in Normal and Emergency Situations
,”
ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncert. Eng. Sys. Part B Mech. Eng.
,
6
(
1
), p. 011009.10.1115/1.4044791
36.
Deb
,
S.
,
Strawderman
,
L. J.
, and
Carruth
,
D. W.
,
2018
, “
Investigating Pedestrian Suggestions for External Features on Fully Autonomous Vehicles: A Virtual Reality Experiment
,”
Transp. Research Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav.
,
59
, pp.
135
149
.10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.016
37.
Kettwich
,
C. J.
,
Dodiya
,
M.
,
Wilbrink
,
M.
, and
Schieben
,
A. M.
,
2019
, “
Light-Based Communication of Automated Vehicles With Other Traffic Participants-a Usability Study in a Virtual Reality Environment
,”
International Symposium on Automotive Lighting
, utzverlag GmbH, pp.
567
576
, vol.
18
.
38.
Stadler
,
S.
,
Cornet
,
H.
,
Theoto
,
T. N.
, and
Frenkler
,
F.
,
2019
, “
A Tool, Not a Toy: Using Virtual Reality to Evaluate the Communication Between Autonomous Vehicles and Pedestrians
,”
Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality
,
Springer
,
Cham
, pp.
203
216
.
39.
Velasco
,
J. P. N.
,
Farah
,
H.
,
van Arem
,
B.
, and
Hagenzieker
,
M. P.
,
2019
, “
Studying Pedestrians' Crossing Behavior When Interacting With Automated Vehicles Using Virtual Reality
,”
Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav.
,
66
, pp.
1
14
.10.1016/j.trf.2019.08.015
40.
Donmez
,
B.
,
Boyle
,
L. N.
, and
Lee
,
J. D.
,
2006
, “
The Impact of Distraction Mitigation Strategies on Driving Performance
,”
Human Factors
,
48
(
4
), pp.
785
804
.10.1518/001872006779166415
41.
Itoh
,
M.
,
Horikome
,
T.
, and
Inagaki
,
T.
,
2013
, “
Effectiveness and Driver Acceptance of a Semi-Autonomous Forward Obstacle Collision Avoidance System
,”
Appl. Ergon.
,
44
(
5
), pp.
756
763
.10.1016/j.apergo.2013.01.006
42.
Zito
,
G. A.
,
Cazzoli
,
D.
,
Scheffler
,
L.
,
Jäger
,
M.
,
Müri
,
R. M.
,
Mosimann
,
U. P.
,
Nyffeler
,
T.
,
Mast
,
F. W.
, and
Nef
,
T.
,
2015
, “
Street Crossing Behavior in Younger and Older Pedestrians: An Eye-and Head-Tracking Study
,”
BMC Geriatr.
,
15
(
1
), pp.
1
10
.10.1186/s12877-015-0175-0
43.
Bartneck
,
C.
,
Kulić
,
D.
,
Croft
,
E.
, and
Zoghbi
,
S.
,
2009
, “
Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots
,”
Int. Journal Social Robotics
,
1
(
1
), pp.
71
81
.10.1007/s12369-008-0001-3
44.
Jian
,
J.-Y.
,
Bisantz
,
A. M.
, and
Drury
,
C. G.
,
2000
, “
Foundations for an Empirically Determined Scale of Trust in Automated Systems
,”
Int. J. Cognit. Ergon.
,
4
(
1
), pp.
53
71
.10.1207/S15327566IJCE0401_04
45.
Paddeu
,
D.
,
Parkhurst
,
G.
, and
Shergold
,
I.
,
2020
, “
Passenger Comfort and Trust on First-Time Use of a Shared Autonomous Shuttle Vehicle
,”
Transp. Res. Part C: Emerging Technol.
,
115
, p.
102604
.10.1016/j.trc.2020.02.026
46.
Kulviwat
,
S.
,
Bruner
,
G. C.
, II
,
Kumar
,
A.
,
Nasco
,
S. A.
, and
Clark
,
T.
,
2007
, “
Toward a Unified Theory of Consumer Acceptance Technology
,”
Psychol. Mark.
,
24
(
12
), pp.
1059
1084
.10.1002/mar.20196
47.
Lee
,
M.-B.
,
Suh
,
K.-S.
, and
Whang
,
J.
,
2003
, “
The Impact of Situation Awareness Information on Consumer Attitudes in the Internet Shopping Mall
,”
Electron. Commer. Res. Appl.
,
2
(
3
), pp.
254
265
.10.1016/S1567-4223(03)00028-0
48.
Verma
,
S.
,
Sekhar Bhattacharyya
,
S.
, and
Kumar
,
S.
,
2018
, “
An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model in the Big Data Analytics System Implementation Environment
,”
Inf. Process. Manage.
,
54
(
5
), pp.
791
806
.10.1016/j.ipm.2018.01.004
49.
Hu
,
P. J.
,
Chau
,
P. Y.
,
Sheng
,
O. R. L.
, and
Tam
,
K. Y.
,
1999
, “
Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology
,”
J. Manage. Inf. Syst.
,
16
(
2
), pp.
91
112
.10.1080/07421222.1999.11518247
50.
Liao
,
C.
,
Palvia
,
P.
, and
Chen
,
J.-L.
,
2009
, “
Information Technology Adoption Behavior Life Cycle: Toward a Technology Continuance Theory (TCT)
,”
Int. J. Inf. Manage.
,
29
(
4
), pp.
309
320
.10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.03.004
51.
Hartwich
,
F.
,
Beggiato
,
M.
, and
Krems
,
J. F.
,
2018
, “
Driving Comfort, Enjoyment and Acceptance of Automated Driving–Effects of Drivers' Age and Driving Style Familiarity
,”
Ergonomics
,
61
(
8
), pp.
1017
1032
.10.1080/00140139.2018.1441448
You do not currently have access to this content.