Managing potential disruptive events at the operating phase of an engineered system therefore improving the system's failure resilience is an importance yet challenging task in engineering design. The resilience of an engineered system can be improved by enhancing the failure restoration capability of the system with appropriate system control strategies. Therefore, control-guided failure restoration is an essential step in engineering design for resilience. Considering different characteristics of disruptive events and their impacts to the performance of a system, effective control strategies for the failure restoration must be selected correspondingly. However, the challenge is to develop generally applicable guiding principles for selecting effective control strategies, thus implementing the control-guided failure restorations. In this paper, a comparison of three commonly used control strategies for dynamic system control is conducted with the focus on the effectiveness of restoring system performance after the system has undergone different major disruptive events. A case study of an electricity transmission system is used to demonstrate the dynamic system modeling and the comparison of three control strategies for disruption management.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
June 2019
Research-Article
A Comparison of Control Strategies for Disruption Management in Engineering Design for Resilience
Jiaxin Wu,
Jiaxin Wu
Department of Industrial and Enterprise Systems
Engineering,
University of Illinois,
Urbana, IL 61801-3080
e-mail: jiaxinw3@illinois.edu
Engineering,
University of Illinois,
Urbana, IL 61801-3080
e-mail: jiaxinw3@illinois.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Pingfeng Wang
Pingfeng Wang
Department of Industrial and Enterprise Systems
Engineering,
University of Illinois,
Urbana, IL 61801-3080
e-mail: pingfeng@illinois.edu
Engineering,
University of Illinois,
Urbana, IL 61801-3080
e-mail: pingfeng@illinois.edu
1Corresponding author.
Search for other works by this author on:
Jiaxin Wu
Department of Industrial and Enterprise Systems
Engineering,
University of Illinois,
Urbana, IL 61801-3080
e-mail: jiaxinw3@illinois.edu
Engineering,
University of Illinois,
Urbana, IL 61801-3080
e-mail: jiaxinw3@illinois.edu
Pingfeng Wang
Department of Industrial and Enterprise Systems
Engineering,
University of Illinois,
Urbana, IL 61801-3080
e-mail: pingfeng@illinois.edu
Engineering,
University of Illinois,
Urbana, IL 61801-3080
e-mail: pingfeng@illinois.edu
1Corresponding author.
Manuscript received July 21, 2018; final manuscript received October 26, 2018; published online April 15, 2019. Assoc. Editor: Zhen Hu.
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. Jun 2019, 5(2): 020902 (11 pages)
Published Online: April 15, 2019
Article history
Received:
July 21, 2018
Revised:
October 26, 2018
Citation
Wu, J., and Wang, P. (April 15, 2019). "A Comparison of Control Strategies for Disruption Management in Engineering Design for Resilience." ASME. ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. June 2019; 5(2): 020902. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4042829
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Retracted: What Could Have Saved Fukushima From Its Severe Accident
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B
Retracted: Remaining Useful Life Prediction Method of Aero Engine With Multilayer Uncertainty
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B
Special Section on Decommissioning and Life Extension of Complex Industrial Assets
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (December 2022)
New Regulatory Instrument for Brazilian Decommissioning of Oil and Gas Installations
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (December 2022)
Related Articles
Analysis of Multidimensional Time Delay Systems Using Lambert W Function
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (November,2017)
A Control Theoretic Approach for Solving Underdetermined Problems and Its Application to Control Allocation
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (April,2016)
A Gain-Scheduling Control Approach for Takagi–Sugeno Fuzzy Systems Based on Linear Parameter-Varying Control Theory
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (January,2016)
Lyapunov-Based Control of Mechanical Systems
Appl. Mech. Rev (September,2001)
Articles from Part A: Civil Engineering
Bi-Objective Vulnerability-Reduction Formulation for a Network under Diverse Attacks
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering (December,2017)
Practical Resilience Metrics for Planning, Design, and Decision Making
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering (September,2015)
Climate and Related Uncertainties Influencing Research and Development Priorities
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering (June,2015)
Multicriteria Decision Analysis Approach for Stochastic Ranking with Application to Network Resilience
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering (March,2016)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Norms of Feedback Systems
Robust Control: Youla Parameterization Approach
Speedup Resilience: A Practical Metric to Explore the Performance Boundary of Multicore Architectures
International Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Technology (ICMET-London 2011)
The Human Factor in Network System Survivability (PSAM-0090)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)