Go-karts are a common amusement park feature enjoyed by people of all ages. While intended for racing, contact between go-karts does occur. To investigate and quantify the accelerations and forces which result from contact, 44 low-speed impacts were conducted between a stationary (target) and a moving (bullet) go-kart. The occupant of the bullet go-kart was one of two human volunteers. The occupant of the target go-kart was a Hybrid III 50th percentile male anthropomorphic test device (ATD). Impact configurations consisted of rear-end impacts, frontal impacts, side impacts, and oblique impacts. Results demonstrated high repeatability for the vehicle performance and occupant response. Go-kart accelerations and speed changes increased with increased impact speed. Impact duration and restitution generally decreased with increased impact speed. All ATD acceleration, force, and moment values increased with increased impact speed. Common injury metrics such as the head injury criterion (HIC), Nij, and Nkm were calculated and were found to be below injury thresholds. Occupant response was also compared to published activities of daily living data.

References

References
1.
U.S. Consumer Products Safety Commission, 2017, “
National Electronic Injury Surveillance Sampling System
,” Directorate for Epidemiology and Health Sciences, Hazard Analysis Division, Bethesda, MD,
Report
.
2.
Vijayakumar
,
V.
,
Scher
,
I.
,
Gloeckner
,
D.
,
Pierce
,
J.
,
Bove
,
R.
,
Young
,
D.
, and
Cargill
,
R.
,
2006
, “
Head Kinematics and Upper Neck Loading During Simulated Low-Speed Rear-End Collisions: A Comparison With Vigorous Activities of Daily Living
,”
SAE
Paper No. 2006-01-0247.
3.
Balasubramanian
,
S.
,
Seacrist
,
T.
,
Maltese
,
M.
,
Arbogast
,
K.
,
Hopely
,
T.
,
Constans
,
E.
,
Sterner
,
R.
,
Tanji
,
H.
, and
Higuchi
,
K.
,
2009
, “
Head and Spinal Trajectories in Children and Adults Exposed to Low Speed Frontal Acceleration
,”
21st International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles
, Stuttgart, Germany, June 15–18, Paper No.
09-0263
.
4.
Mkandawire
,
C.
,
Mazzucco
,
D.
,
Vijayakumar
,
V.
,
Scher
,
I.
,
Heller
,
M.
, and
Morrison
,
H.
,
2006
, “
Head Kinematics and Upper Neck Loading During Simulated Low-Speed Lateral Impact Collisions
,”
FISITA 2006 World Automotive Congress
, Yokohama, Japan, Oct. 22–27.
5.
Davidsson
,
J.
,
Lövsund
,
P.
,
Ono
,
K.
,
Svensson
,
M. Y.
, and
Inami
,
S.
,
1999
, “
A Comparison Between Volunteer, BioRID P3 and Hybrid III Performance in Rear Impacts
,”
International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury Conference
, Bron, France, pp.
165
178
.
6.
Kim
,
A.
,
Sutterfield
,
A.
,
Rao
,
A.
,
Anderson
,
K. F.
,
Berliner
,
J.
,
Hassan
,
J.
,
Irwin
,
A.
,
Jensen
,
J.
,
Kleinert
,
J.
,
Mertz
,
H. J.
,
Pietsch
,
H.
,
Rouhana
,
S.
, and
Scherer
,
R.
,
2005
, “
A Comparison of the BioRID II, Hybrid III, and RID2 in Low Severity Rear Impacts
,” 19th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV), Washington, DC, June 6–9, Paper No.
05–0225
.
7.
Stolinski
,
R.
,
Grzebieta
,
R.
,
Fildes
,
B.
,
Judd
,
R.
,
Wawrzynczak
,
J.
,
Gray
,
I.
,
McGrath
,
P.
, and
Case
,
M.
,
1999
, “
Response of Far-Side Occupants in Car-to-Car Impacts With Standard and Modified Restraint Systems Using Hybrid III and US-SID
,”
SAE
Paper No. 1999-01-1321.
8.
SAE
,
2014
, “
Instrumentation for Impact Test—Part 1: Electronic Instrumentation
,” Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, Standard No.
SAE J211-1:2014
.
9.
U.S. DOT, 2011 “
Occupant Crash Protection, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations
,” U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, U.S. DOT Regulation 49CFR571.208.
10.
Schmitt
,
K.
,
Muser
,
M.
,
Walz
,
F.
, and
Niederer
,
P.
,
2002
, “
N Km—A Proposal for a Neck Protection Criterion for Low-Speed Rear-End Impacts
,”
Traffic Inj. Prev.
,
3
(
2
), pp.
117
126
.
11.
Kleinberger
,
M.
,
Sun
,
E.
,
Eppinger
,
R.
,
Kuppa
,
S.
, and
Saul
,
R.
,
1998
,
Development of Improved Injury Criteria for the Assessment of Advanced Automotive Restraint Systems
,
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
,
Washington, DC
.
12.
Mertz
,
H. J.
,
Irwin
,
A. L.
, and
Prasad
,
P.
,
2003
, “
Biomechanical and Scaling Bases for Frontal and Side Impact Injury Assessment Reference Values
,”
SAE
Paper No. 2003-22-0009.
13.
Rodowicz
,
K. A.
,
Dupont
,
K.
,
Smedley
,
J.
,
Raasch
,
C.
,
Mkandawire
,
C.
,
Fittanto
,
D.
,
Bare
,
C.
, and
Smith
,
J.
,
2011
, “
Passenger Vehicle Occupant Response to Low-Speed Impacts with a Tractor-Semitrailer
,”
SAE
Paper No. 2011-01-1125.
14.
Schnebel
,
B.
,
Gwin
,
J. T.
,
Anderson
,
S.
, and
Gatlin
,
R.
,
2007
, “
In Vivo Study of Head Impacts in Football: A Comparison of National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Versus High School Impacts
,”
Neurosurg.
,
60
(
3
), pp.
490
496
.
15.
Rowson
,
S.
,
Brolinson
,
G.
,
Goforth
,
M.
,
Dietter
,
D.
, and
Duma
,
S.
,
2009
, “
Linear and Angular Head Acceleration Measurements in Collegiate Football
,”
ASME J. Biomech. Eng.
,
131
(
6
), p.
061016
.
16.
Funk
,
J. R.
,
Cormier
,
J. M.
,
Bain
,
C. E.
,
Guzman
,
H.
, and
Bonugli
,
E.
,
2007
, “
An Evaluation of Various Neck Injury Criteria in Vigorous Activities
,”
International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury Conference
(
IRCOBI
), Maastricht, The Netherlands, Sept. 19–21, pp 233–248.
17.
Mertz
,
H. J.
, and
Patrick
,
L. M.
,
1971
, “
Strength and Response of the Human Neck
,”
SAE
Paper No. 710855.
18.
Freyder
,
D. R.
,
Peterman
,
E. K.
,
Morr
,
D. R.
,
Ratliff
,
A. R.
, and
Wiechel
,
J. F.
,
2008
, “
MADYMO Model to Assess Lumbar Spine Loading during Activities of Daily Living
,”
SAE
Paper No. 2008-01-1910.
19.
Schultz
,
A.
,
Andersson
,
G.
,
Ortengren
,
R.
,
Haderspeck
,
K.
, and
Nachemson
,
A.
,
1982
, “
Loads on the Lumbar Spine. Validation of a Biomechanical Analysis by Measurements of Intradiscal Pressures and Myoelectric Signals
,”
J. Bone Jt. Surg.
,
64
(
5
), pp.
713
720
.
You do not currently have access to this content.